June Dail Questions
 
 

Next Month


Benchmarking for Education and Contingency Plans
Accesibility to Key Decision Makers in Education Department
Imbalance in Structural spending between Primary and Secondary Schools
 

Order No. 

 

Ref No.     

 

Date:

 

Education and Science:

Written Question           

Question:
To ask the Minister for Education and Science the contingency plans which have been put in place to deal with the risk of strike action in the autumn should the terms offered to teachers as a result of the benchmarking process prove unsatisfactory.

Reply:
The Public Service Benchmarking Body is a totally independent body and is chaired by a High Court judge. Its composition and terms of reference were agreed by the Government and public service unions. It has been asked to produce its report by 30 June. Although employers and unions must negotiate how it is implemented they will not renegotiate the recommendations. An agreement reached between the Government and the trade unions in December 2000 provides for payment of 25% of any increase with effect from 1 December 2001. This will be paid immediately on receipt of the report of the benchmarking body. I do not propose to anticipate its recommendations. I am confident recommendations made in respect of teachers will reflect the increasingly complex role of the teacher and the contribution teachers have made and continue to make to the development of education in Ireland


Order No. 

 

Ref No.     

 

Date:

 

Education and Science:

Written Question           

Question:
To ask the Minister for Education and Science if there are plans to make communications with key decision makers in his Department more accessible from an information and geographical point of view.

Reply:
The planning of a network of regional offices of my Department is at an advanced stage. When implemented these will enhance communication with the wider community and facilitate a greater engagement by my Department with those involved in the planning and delivery of educational services at local level.


Order No. 

 

Ref No.     

 

Date:

 

Education and Science:

Oral Question               

Question:
To ask the Minister for Education and Science if an attempt is being made to redress the imbalance in maintenance and infrastructural spending between primary and second level schools.

Reply:
Since 1997 the funding allocated to primary and second level schools has been increased substantially in accordance with the Government's commitment to giving education a clear priority in the allocation of resources. At primary level schools' running costs have been traditionally met by my Department's scheme of capitation grants. These grants are intended to contribute towards the general operating costs of primary schools. The capitation grant has been increased substantially since 1997. It has been increased from €57.14 per pupil in 1997 to €101.58 per pupil in this school year. In addition a further increase of €10 per pupil will apply from September in respect of the 2002-03 school year. Special enhanced capitation rates are paid in respect of children with special needs who attend special schools or special classes dedicated to children with particular special needs. These special rates can range from €359.34 to €579 per pupil depending on the level of need involved. These rates will increase by €10 per pupil with effect from September. Under the devolved scheme of minor works each primary school receives an annual grant of €3,809 together with €12.70 per pupil. At post-primary level the main per capita grant amounts to €256.49 per pupil. The grant was increased from €224.74 to €233.63 in 1999. It was further increased by €10.16 to €243.79 in September 2000, and to €256.49 in September 2001. A further increase of €10 is due from September next in respect of the 2002-03 school year which will bring the rate per pupil to €266.49. For a school with 500 pupils this amounts to an extra €20,875 per annum and a total capitation grant of €133,245 towards general expenses. An additional per capita grant of €38.09 per pupil is paid to disadvantaged schools bringing the total grant in the case of such a school with 500 pupils to €152,290. The available data does not enable valid comparisons to be made between the levels of grants paid and the actual costs of running schools at primary and post-primary levels. It is accepted that the maintenance costs for second level schools are much greater on a unit cost basis than those in primary schools. In general second level schools are larger than primary schools and this leads to higher unit costs for heat, light, power, maintenance and cleaning. In addition, the second level capitation is required to cover a different range of expenditures. Second level schools provide a broader curriculum, including technical subjects where the costs of materials may be greater than at primary level. Specialist equipment and rooms are required for some subjects leading to higher maintenance-replacement costs. The Deputy will also be aware that the Government is committed, under its agreed programme, to continue to improve funding for all schools.

 

Next Month