SAOIRSE - Irish Freedom
Issue number 120

April, 1997


Apprentice Boys not to march on lower Ormeau Road

The Apprentice Boys announced on March 19 that they will march as far as the Ormeau Bridge in Belfast on Easter Monday in the first loyalist march of the season, but they will not march through the nationalist lower Ormeau Road. After marching to Ormeau Bridge they will travel by coach to join the main parade in Killyleagh, County Down, the Apprentice Boys said.
Contents

Arms find in Fermanagh

British Crown forces announced that they had seized nearly 2lbs of Semtex, 200 rounds of ammunition, a coffee-jar bomb and a tripod for a heavy machine-gun following searches in Corragunt, Roslea, County Fermanagh on March 21. British forces defused two Mark 16 mortar-bombs in Derrylin, County Fermanagh on March 19. They began a search of the area on March 18 following a coded phone warning from the Provisionals that the devices had been abandoned there.
Contents

Trimble says unionists have achieved almost ‘all of our agenda’

David Trimble admitted on February 27 that the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) had achieved almost “all of our agenda” with the British government’s announcement of the extension of the powers of the British House of Commons ‘Northern Ireland Grand Committee’.

The lame-duck Tory government has also allowed the ‘Grand Committee’ to sit in Belfast and question British ministers in the colonial administration there. The move is a further cementing of British rule extracted from John Major as a result of his absolute reliance on the nine UUP MPs for the survival of his government in the Westminster parliament until the British general election on May 1.

That position was weakened further on February 28 when the Conservative Party suffered a humiliating defeat with the election of a Labour Party candidate in Wirral South.

The loss of the former Tory stronghold on a 17% swing put the Tories in a one-vote Commons minority.

However Ulster Unionist Party leader David Trimble is not worried by the impending doom of his Tory allies in Britain. Labour party leader Tony Blair has successfully turned his front bench into clones of the Conservatives who are only too happy to ape Tory policies in Britain and Occupied Ireland.
Contents

Léirmheas. Popular revolt and the Workers’ Republic

Revolution in Ireland – popular militancy 1917 to 1923, by Conor Kostick, Pluto Press £12.99.

Kostick's book, Revolution in Ireland, is an in-depth study of the militancy of working people throughout urban and rural Ireland during the period 1917 to 1923. Throughout this turbulent time, Kostick argues that it was the actions of the working classes which provided the main blows against British rule in Ireland rather than the sole activities of the IRA and Sinn Féin.

The Russian Revolution of 1917 inspired many people to believe that a socialist society was a viable prospect. According to Kostick: “The struggle for Irish independence emerged in this context of a Europe-wide revolt against discredited and spent authorities.”

By 1917, the situation for workers all over Europe was deteriorating. In Ireland, for instance, working class poverty combined with a sense of national injustice led to growing discontent with capitalism and imperialism.

In addition, this discontent did not merely apply to Catholic workers. The ‘Great War’ began to alienate the Protestant working class. “There was growing resentment at talk of sacrifice and restraint, particularly as the employers were making fortunes from the war,” says Kostick. “The mood amongst workers, including Protestants, was a changing one, where it was becoming increasingly clear that the continuation of the ‘Great War’ was the cause of their declining living standards.”

With the end of the ‘Great War’ a mood of militancy developed amongst the Protestant workers, particularly in Belfast. After making so many sacrifices they now wanted something in return for their loyalty. However, in 1919, the demand for a shorter working week was refused thereupon a general strike was initiated by workers in Belfast.

Although the strike was eventually compromised by the reformist nature of the leadership, it illustrated that unionism was not a smooth monolith of common interests between Protestant worker and Protestant employer.

GENERAL STRIKE
Meanwhile, the discontent in the 26 Counties was also manifesting itself. In April 1919, following the revolutionary example set by Russia, workers in Limerick called a general strike in response to military repression. Workers took control of the city’s factories and established a soviet. According to Kostick: “The whole strategy of the British ruling class for rule in Ireland was under threat.”

This radicalism, according to Kostick, was a vigorous part of a European-wide upsurge in working class militancy. Unfortunately, in the same way that the Belfast workers were compromised by the leadership, so too did the labour leadership fail the strikers in Limerick. Due to the absence of a revolutionary socialist party to replace the Labour leadership, the struggle for a Workers’ Republic in Ireland never emerged.

LIBERATION STRUGGLE
Subsequently, most of the actions of the working class were channelled into the liberation struggle for an Irish Republic. Unfortunately the policy of uniting all classes in the struggle against British rule created tensions within the Republican Movement. The middle class was too compromising, whilst the force that really rocked the British was the working class. It was through their efforts, Kostick argues, that British rule in Ireland suffered its most serious defeats. In April 1921, for example, Ireland’s workers implemented a general strike for the release of political prisoners detained without trial. The outcome was a victory which undermined British rule in Ireland.

Kostick argues that because the workers’ struggle in the 26 Counties was limited to a nationalist agenda, Protestant workers became alienated thus allowing sectarianism to grow in the Six Counties. Adding that the two-stage approach of independence first, followed by socialism subsequently made partition inevitable. Nevertheless, Kostick’s analysis is too dismissive of the role that militant Republicans played in the independence struggle whilst over emphasising the role of militant workers in the struggle. The rank and file of the IRA were overwhelmingly working class and it was such people who were at the vanguard of the struggle.

In addition, Kostick criticises the Republican strategy of conducting the national struggle before the class struggle because it creates a barrier between Protestant and Catholic workers. This argument has also been espoused by the Workers’ Party which eventually led them to the path of reactionary politics.

Whilst Ireland remains under British rule the Catholic and Protestant working class will remain divided. It is not the Republican strategy of national liberation that divides the working class but the strategy of British imperial rule in Ireland.

BANKRUPT STRATEGY
Nevertheless, despite Kostick’s patronising attitude towards the Republican struggle, he makes some interesting and valid points particularly about the Provisionals’ current strategy which is seen as increasingly bankrupt. For example, he says: “The dilemma for Sinn Féin is that their alternative to the armed struggle is constitutional politics of a sort that cannot satisfy the aspirations of their supporters.”

Kostick’s premise of uniting Protestant and Catholic workers before tackling the national struggle in order to achieve a Workers’ Republic has to be questioned. Within the context of a sectarian state under imperialist rule, such as that which operates in the Six Counties, a privileged section of the working class are not going to voluntarily relinquish their triumphalist position.
— Eugene Egan
Contents

Starry Plough


Web layout by SAOIRSE -- Irish Freedom


Send links, events notifications, articles, comments etc, to the editor at: saoirse@iol.ie marked "attention web-editor".