UPDATES COMING... ...CHECK [HOMEPAGE]
Columbia Strike Linked To
Ariane Rocket Explosion
--'Takeoff Damage' Professor Has UK Defense
--Rosetta Project Sold 24hrs. Before Shuttle Blast--
February 2, 2003
"IT WAS TAKEOFF DAMAGE"
& WinMedia Video
Comet Research Mission
Can Europe afford space research
that keeps going up in smoke?
12 December 2002
The European Space Agency has opened an
independent inquiry into the failure of the
Ariane 5 rocket that shattered into myriad
pieces before splashing into the Atlantic.
Image shown above is of Ariane 5
similar mishap in 1996.
'space expert' wheeled
out today to bolster the media spin that damage at takeoff caused
the space shuttle Columbia to disintegrate on reentry, had only days previously
been grounded by the takeoff explosion of a European Ariane 5 satellite
And financial interests behind the Ministry of
Defense-linked project for which he works were sold
to new investors only 24hrs. before the Columbia disintegrated in
the skies over Texas.
Following the catastrophic loss of the Columbia the Anglo-American establishment
media spin has seized on damage to the heat-resistant ceramic tiles to
explain away the loss of the craft. This speed of this conclusion has
rivaled that which saw Osama bin Laden identified as the culprit for 9/11.
In the Britain today, as widely reported in the US, Professor Andre Balogh
told SkyNews that the space shuttle Columbia was "doomed" from the launch
of the mission. The damage done to the wing, said Prof. Balogh, was "just
there and waiting to destroy Columbia".
He claimed that NASA had been fully aware of the problem and had, in all
probability, known all along it was potentially fatal.
However, Professor Balogh is no disinterested observer. He works for a
consortium whose Rosetta comet research mission was indefinitely
postponed mid-January 2003, by the explosion of the latest European
Space Agency's, Ariane 5 satellite payload rocket, which shattered into
12, 2002 only 3 minutes after launch from
project is funded by the European Space Agency and is tied to UK Ministry
of Defense due to the technically advanced nature of projects associated
with it's personnel, funding and management.
On 31st of January, 2003, just 24hrs. before the Columbia disaster, BAE
Systems, the UK defense contractor, announced
a deal to sell its interest in the satellite concern, Astrium
--which is heavily involved in the Rosetta project-- to EADS, Europe's
leading aerospace group.
years in preparation, the Rosetta project on which the professor works
had scheduled an early 2003 launch to conduct advanced plasma physics
research by intercepting a comet. Now the launch window has closed on
that plan. The Ariane series has been plagued by a series of failures
which have left it with the worst track record in the satellite payload
The primary beneficiaries of the problems with the Ariane series have
been Boeing and Lockheed Martin --both of whom successfully launched rival
rockets just weeks before the latest Ariane December 2002 failure. Russian
Air Launch Corp. was also expected to benefit from Ariane's woes -with
plans to use jumbo "Ruslan" planes for cheap mid-air satellite launching.
JUST STAY AWAY FROM TV
full resources of persuasion of the spin doctors of US public opinion
have already been deployed to divert the public from any focus on the
true cause --direct
hit by an enemy. In this case by use
of a scalar weapon.
In the alternative press, the need for questioning comment will be fed
by the construction of a deflecting pseudo-controversy. That has
already been launched. The spin is that NASA knew of the tiles problem
and kept mum. Nasty old Government eh?
fact that Professor Balogh managed to get both mainstream and alternative
spins into his brief comments is testimony to the sophistication of the
Various pseudo-anti-establishment figures are already pushing the pseudo-controversy.
See who pushes it hardest and you can tell who is a real independent investigator.
Note their names for next time -then you can really get to understand
what's going on. Some of the high-profile people involved will surprise
--Jeff Rense being one rather obvious example.
All of this helps make clear why agencies bother to spend such time and
energy establishing these puppets of pretend Government opposition. Payoff
time comes when events such as this need to be smoothed over. That's classic
information warfare, and it's PsyOp 101 primary tactics, by the way. Your
best defense is NOT to watch TV -but rather to rely on the written
word and reports of TV presentation when evaluating. It's the repetition
on broadcast after broadcast that is so effective in promoting pap. If
all those people in suits are saying it time after time -it must
The news managers of the Anglo-American establishment are the very professional
indeed. One day after the event, most people have forgotten they had well
founded suspicions of the true cause. One has to admire that level of
opinion management. Next stage will be to layer on new news and
drop this like a hot potato. Beautiful.
is worth noting that before the latest hue and cry over the loss of ceramic
tiles, a more measured Time interview with their science correspondent
Jeffrey Kluger ruled out tile loss as a cause.
Interview extract follows with our emphasis in bold:
TIME.com: What are the possible scenarios
that could have caused this disastrous accident on the shuttle's reentry
into the Earth's atmosphere?
Scalar Strike On Columbia Ends WW3?
Jeffrey Kluger: There are three possible scenarios that explain this event.
The first, which I believe is the likeliest explanation, would be an
aerodynamic structural breakup of the shuttle caused by it rolling at
the wrong angle. Remember, after reentry, the shuttle is descending
without power, which means astronauts at the controls can't compensate
for a loss of attitude by using the engines, they can only do so using
the flaps. And that's extremely hard. Astronauts describe piloting the
shuttle on reentry as like trying to fly a brick with wings. It's very
difficult to operate, and even more so to correct any problems.
A second explanation might be a loss of tiles leading to a burn-through.
But I think that explanation is unlikely, because the tile-loss would
have had to have been quite substantial for that to become possible. You'll
hear a lot in the next few days about things falling off the shuttle during
liftoff. But it often happens that they lose a few tiles, and I'd be surprised
if it happened on a scale that could make an accident of this type possible.
The last option is some kind of engine failure leading to fuel ignition.
Although the main tanks are mostly empty, there should still be fuel left
in the maneuvering tanks. But probably not enough for an explosion that
could have caused this breakup.
See Also Scalar
Weapons Threaten Axis of Earth
See Also Fake
Israeli Photo Betrays Columbia Coverup