|
| |
- Top 'small ball' aficionados stick the boot in by Colm
Keys - Irish Independent 2nd March 2005
- Fixtures flop not helped by GAA's staggering myopia
by Martin Breheny - Irish Independent 2nd March 2005
- Hurling - like Boxing - has manliness at its very core
by Vincent Hogan - Irish Independent 22nd February 2005
- Players persecuted and prosecuted with little reward
by Vincent Hogan - Irish Independent 9th November 2004
- Puckout Strategy by Michael Moynihan - 8th September
2004 Irish Examiner
|
HERE'S the deal. You were handed 20 prior to the start of
the Allianz Leagues and asked to engage the bookmakers with a view to making a profit over
the first two series of games.
So you headed into battle, armed with 10 each for hurling and football. Shrewd judge
that you are, things went well. You picked out 12 fancies in Division One football over
the first two weekends, rolled them into a 10 accumulator and as result clicked your
way, the profits spiralled. Your final take from the 12 winners came to the grand total of
7,214. Nice business.
Your other 10 went on the 12 counties who turned out to be winners over two series
of NHL games. And then you got a shock. Instead of emerging from the bookmaker with
another bulging wallet, you collected 307. That's right - 1/24th of the football
take. No, the bookmaker hasn't fiddled you. It's just that with such a level of certainty
in hurling, the odds are so tight it's a miracle they don't strangle themselves. They're
not exactly generous in football either but at least there's sufficient doubt about enough
games to make them interesting.
Sadly, that's not the case in hurling where, as the return from a 10 accumulator
shows, favourites are dominating to an alarming degree. Not surprisingly, it's being
reflected in the attendances. Admittedly, last Sunday's low turnout was influenced by the
Ireland v England rugby international which, in a staggering exhibition of myopia, the
GAA's fixture-makers ignored. Ireland v England is always a massive event and all the more
so this season with Irish eyes on a Grand Slam. Two years ago, the GAA switched their
entire League programme to a Saturday to avoid a clash with the Ireland v England Grand
Slam game the following day and, guess what, the sun still rose the next day. Avoiding a
direct clash with such a major international event was a sensible, intelligent, confident
response. Yes, of course there were some complaints from a tiny minority as they peeped
out from under their inferiority complex but it was ignored in the broader interest.
Not this time. The GAA challenged the rugby international for the attentions of its own
members last Sunday and were given an unequivocal response. The large, empty tracts on
stands and terraces proved that followers can never be taken for granted. Why not have
scheduled the NHL programme for Saturday? Clare have played both of their games on a
Saturday so why couldn't the other counties have switched days, even for one round?
Failing that, why not have started the games at 1.15 on Sunday in order to allow GAA
followers to watch the rugby at 3.0?
Right now, hurling needs encouragement and it didn't get it last Sunday. All 12 games
played so far in Division One of the NHL have been won by the favourites, some of whom
have been as tight at 1/50. The fact that not one team has upset the odds points to a game
where counties are being strung out more than ever along the track. However much people
love hurling, they won't turn out in big numbers for predictable games on cold February
days and certainly not when there is a direct clash with a big international event.
Remember those exciting spring Sundays in the second half of the '90s when crowds of over
20,000 attended League games involving Clare, Limerick and Tipperary and where cars were
parked for miles outside Athenry when Clare took on Galway?
Then, there was the Thursday evening in April 2001 when around 11,000 people caused
traffic chaos around the Limerick Gaelic Grounds as they inched their way towards a
Limerick v Clare clash. Limerick and Tipperary drew 1,500 last Sunday while there were
less than 800 in Pearse Stadium for the throw-in of the Galway-Dublin game a week earlier.
Laois put up an encouraging performance against Clare last Saturday week but still drew
less than 500 to O'Moore Park for last Sunday's tie with Waterford which they proceeded to
lose by eight points, a result which won't require the turnstiles to be oiled for the next
home game.
The underlying issue here is that there is a growing feeling in the hurling world that
most of the big prizes over the next five years at least will be won by either Kilkenny or
Cork. Of course, there will be some upsets along the way, similar to Wexford's stunning
win over Kilkenny last year, but with the back door inviting all losers back into
contention the super-powers will continue to gain most.
What hurling needs most of all right now is the arrival of a new force.
Waterford have come tantalisingly close but can't get over the All-Ireland line but at
least they are keeping the 'big two' in their sights. Tipperary appear to be losing ground
while Wexford lack consistency.
Elsewhere, Limerick are trapped in a desert; Clare aren't anywhere near the force they
were in the '90s; Galway continue to promise but are unable to sign the delivery note;
Offaly are quite some way off All-Ireland pace while Dublin and Laois are no longer
capable of pulling off a summer surprise and even their spring shocks are less frequent
than they used to be.
Colm Keys reports below on an initiative designed to streamline hurling coaching from
Croke Park and while it's to be welcomed, it remains to be seen if it will have any major
impact since history shows that unless counties help themselves, nothing changes.
The average winning margin in the 12 Division One games so far this season has been eight
points. One hopes for hurling's sake that it's an early season blip rather than a sign of
things to come. Wouldn't bet on it though.
Martin Breheny
What do you think ?
Air your views in the Forum |
THE English are sometimes mystified at the level of Irish enmity built up towards
them, particularly in matters of sport. No Irish crowd ever fails to greet news of a
defeat for an Anglo rugby, soccer or even cricket defeat with a hearty cheer. It's an
enmity that is rarely reciprocated.
Such hostility isn't just confined to Anglo Irish affairs or even the shared use of a
sports stadium within this country as anyone who wandered into the Heritage Hotel in
Portlaoise on Monday night last to listen to the 'Great Hurling Debate' would have
discovered.
Gaelic football and hurling are purported to be sister sports, run by the same
organisation through the same structures, played by the same numbers on the same pitch
dimensions with rules that differ only through the nature of the games themselves. The
fundamentals are much the same.
But hurling has a problem with football that isn't reciprocated to the same degree. And
when 'hurling men' get together on the one platform their distaste for the big ball game
is accentuated in no veiled terms.
The 'Great Debate' attracted some great men. Ger Loughnane, Cyril Farrell and Brian Cody,
all managers of All-Ireland winning teams, Michael Duignan and the celebrated Brian
Whelahan from neighbouring Offaly, Laois county team manager Paudie Butler, Humphrey
Kelleher from Dublin and Cork's All-Ireland winning captain in 1990, Tomás Mulcahy.
Micheál Ó Muircheartaigh compered.
Over 400 attended but anyone from a football background could have been sinking in the
chairs from an early stage as the bullets flew. It was the central theme of an enjoyable
night.
Loughnane spoke of 'interference' from football being a drawback for hurling as he pushed
the idea for a separate department for hurling in Croke Park.
In almost Paisleyesque style, he demonised football to the delight of the aficionados
present. He had help from the top table. Ó Muircheartaigh recalled how former Waterford
great Ned Power claimed that there were 129 skills in hurling, Kelleher chipped in that
football had just two - catch and kick!
Kelleher spoke of how only 'special people' hurled because hurling was such a special
game.
The blows kept coming and the big hitters were waiting. "It doesn't interfere with us
in Kilkenny and that's the way it should be," said Cody.
"They are two totally different games. Hurling is strong in Kilkenny and it just
can't sustain both games. We get all sorts of flak about it from Croke Park. We're told
now that we have to enter teams in the Tommy Murphy Cup this year.
"I'm speaking for myself but we're not interested in playing football at any major
level in Kilkenny. We compete at underage level play our schools competitions and it's
grand. Fellas enjoy it. But we're a hurling county and we intend staying that way."
It got worse. Mulcahy recalled how a similar forum in the Cork football heartland of
Clonakilty heard a former Rebel great proclaim that if he had his way he'd 'puncture every
football'.
Mulcahy himself was more tolerant. He did after all make an appearance in a Munster
football final.
But he remained true to his belief that 'football was a game for bad hurlers', a
tongue-in-cheek comment that drew delirious approval from the floor and a mild rebuke
later from current Wexford football manager and Laois native Pat Roe.
Michael Duignan courted football and hurling but managed to enjoy a half decent football
career at inter-county level despite very little underage coaching or activity.
Hence football was an easier game to master than hurling. "You catch it and kick and
that's it," he noted dismissively.
After a debate about hurling's best players and candidates for this year's All-Ireland the
panel agreed that only three teams could win the Liam McCarthy Cup in 2005 and this point
introduced another strand.
Are the game's rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer? Yes was the unanimous
verdict though Loughnane qualified his comments by claiming that the standard of the top
teams is better than ever though the top tier was shared by too few now.
Butler recalled a recent exercise he did when he traced the county origins of the players
on the eight Fitzgibbon Cup teams that started four quarter-finals earlier this year.
Out of 105 players most were from Galway, Cork, Clare, Kilkenny, Tipperary and Wexford.
Limerick and Offaly were down to a trickle, Mayo had a sprinkling and Kerry had one.
Galway's possible presence in the Leinster championship drew a mixed response.
"If I was Galway player I would want to play there because it would mean more
matches," said Cody whose own personal preference was for an open draw and the
abandonment of the provincial championships.
"Galway should have been compelled to play in Leinster," argued Farrell but
Loughnane explained that there was no rule to compel them to do so.
"Galway gave the HDC three reasons why they wouldn't go to Leinster when they were
asked," he explained. "There was no financial incentive for them, Leinster meant
nothing to them and they had a bad experience in Munster before."
On the possibility of a video referee being introduced for Gaelic games, the recent
Leinster club final controversy between James Stephens and UCD was touched upon. The
Kilkenny champions scored a 'point' that wasn't, UCD manager Babs Keating complained and
didn't go down well with Cody, himself a James Stephens man who described Babs' complaints
as 'tragic.'
On the dual player issue, Loughnane has changed his tune. The man who once stopped Ollie
Baker and Frank Lohan from playing in a Munster U21 final in the same week as an
All-Ireland senior semi-final, now feels that those counties outside the very top tier
(i.e everyone except Cork and Kilkenny) should play their best players no matter what
their interests are.
Naturally Kelleher agreed given the situation with Conal Keaney and Shane Ryan but the
panel was unanimous that football had no place in hurling preparation.
Back to the theme of the night again!
What do you think ?
Air your views in the Forum |
STICK with us a while and we'll dip into this debate about manliness and hurling,
but - first - be patient. It's hard to write on blood-stained paper. The contents of
someone's nasal cavity is all over TimeOut's notes. It could belong to Francie Barrett. Or
Robbie Murray. Then again, it could belong to that English bloke who took a bit of a
pounding from Jim Rock. Maybe that's something for the National Stadium to ponder. How
about packing oilskins under ringside seats in future? Or goggles? Forgive us the
digression, but - in this neck of the woods - we've always figured that any debate on
manliness in competition should start with the three steps up to a boxing ring. It's
logical. Those three steps amount to the longest journey in sport. Period.
On Saturday night, 12 fighters took that journey in the sweaty, old hall on Dublin's South
Circular and virtually all got busted up in some way. Even Bernard Dunne, the star-turn of
the evening, shipped a bad gash above his left eye. Mostly, folk don't notice these things
in boxing. They don't notice when the two referees go change their shirts mid-show,
because referees don't look good in spattered crimson.
They don't notice the stark, little moments of solitude for the fighters. Like Barrett
blessing himself before the first bell or Rock slipping to one knee and murmuring a
prayer. Mostly, they are just consumed by the efficacy of hard men strutting like edgy
peacocks. Many, many years ago, this column got its first close-up of a prize-fight,
when assisting the old Daily Mirror scribe, Frank McGhee, from ringside at Wembley
Convention Centre. McGhee scribbled his wisdom long-hand and this cub dictated it down a
phone-line. At the time, John 'The Beast' Mugabi was just coming to the fore as a clubbing
terrorist and, soon enough that night, he began wreaking terrible destruction on a young
fighter directly above McGhee's head. When one punch landed flush on the bridge of the
victim's nose, the contents of said nose descended with a plenary splat onto one of the
hand-written scrolls. McGhee scarcely blinked at the trespass. Cub's legs turned soft as
cooked linguini. You cannot simulate the effect of a heavy punch igniting in someone's
face. Nor can you get used to it. The sound is always disturbing. A man's (or woman's)
brain cannot, feasibly, be knocked about like a pin-ball without running serious threat of
calamitous harm.
So you can understand the revulsion some people feel for boxing. Pro boxing especially.
It's just too brutal to be comfortable. But what you cannot deny is the physical courage
of the fighter. The manliness.
Take Robbie Murray. The guy's so pale and inoffensive-looking, one wag in the bleachers
shouted 'C'mon Casper' while he was fighting a Welshman, Ceri Hall. It was a good line,
but Murray wouldn't have much appreciated it when he hit the deck in round two, a geyser
of blood rushing from his face. Yet, somehow, he fought back, dropping Hall in round six
and edging the fight on points, his white shorts now cerise in colour.
Barrett had an equally troubled passage, taking a procession of venomous jabs from
Lithuania's Oscar Milkitas that reduced his face to what Americans like to call 'a bust
tomato can'. Through the fifth round, Francie actually looked in trouble. But his legs
held and he got a pretty ropey hometown verdict in the end.
Anyway, too much blood for you with the morning muesli? Fine, we're finished. It's just
this column believes that fighters are extraordinary people. That the questions they
routinely ask of themselves are questions that most of us would run from.
Ask yourself this: What is it that you love in sport? What leaves you in thrall of its
heroes? Skill? Indisputably. Mental strength? Absolutely. Bravery? Write it down.
Hurling's not perfect, but it's not exactly in need of invasive surgery either. The
experimental rule changes are, clearly, well-intentioned. But they're also meddlesome.
They seek to impose a cold, didactic chain on a game that takes its identity from heat and
spontaneous expression.
The people who fear for hurling just now, those who roll their eyes at its ills -
body-checking, shirt-tugging, verbal intimidation - wouldn't have seen much beauty in the
game of the mid to late nineties either, when Clare seemed to have patented a style drawn
more from running up hills than tip-tapping in a ball alley.
And what happened just as it was being surmised that the game would forever more be
enslaved to brawn? Jimmy Barry-Murphy won the '99 All-Ireland for Cork with an attack that
could have been drawn from a jockeys' weigh-room, that's what. So, you can see why Brian
Cody is so animated. The 'sins' perpetrated by James Ryall and JJ Delaney in Walsh Park on
Sunday weren't exactly the kind that dishonour hurling. They were just petty matters,
unthreatening tugs that can be quickly discouraged by a competent free-taker.
Sending the players off smacked of taking pick-pockets to the scaffold. This isn't an
apologia for lawlessness. Hurling isn't lawless. And it isn't football either, so why
should it experiment so dutifully in football's slipstream? Someone identify a crisis? If
so, where? All hurling needs in its adjudication is a sprig of common sense and empathy
(which, admittedly, is often missing). Not a glossary of fresh rules. It needs the
referee's job to be simplified, not complicated. Some sports have manliness at their core.
That's the place to keep it. .
What do you think ?
Air your views in the Forum |
THIS column is friendly with a chap who, as a teenager, became a
household name in hurling and spent the next eleven years vaguely tyrannised by what life
as a household name in hurling entailed. Once, when his county edged home in a
contest that is now scorched into the book of epics, he confided to us that the experience
had been "horrible". It was an honesty he dared not express aloud. In
latter years, he was accused of "thinking too much" about his game. Of
surrendering to that much jargoned condition of "paralysis by analysis".
Injury-prone, he lost the cavalier edge that won him two All-Irelands in his first three
years as a county man. He eventually retired, dispirited, and drained of much of his
affection for the game.
Then he got over it. Today, he's a success in business, with a six-figure salary. His body
is tattooed with the scars of excessive surgery, but the only trauma he exposes it to now
is a supine Monday night game of seven-a-side in which some of the participants scarcely
retain biological function. To the withered county man, those Monday games are
bliss. No anger, no blood, no vomit-inducing tension. Hindsight fills him with
incredulity now. Why did he do it for so long? What drove him to compromise every other
aspect of his life (social, work, family) in the habitual pursuit of little trinkets that
now sit in a drawer at home? How could he have been so tunnelled in obedience to what
sounded like interminably goading voices?
The funny thing is he has no answers. But this chap believes that inter-county hurling
will soon become just a broader expression of the Fitzgibbon Cup. That it will be
inhabited only by students, or people unburdened by either mortgage or family. Given the
intensity required, he can't see people hurling for their counties beyond their
mid-twenties. Why? Because he thinks they've already begun questioning the requisite
sacrifice. On Friday night last, the GPA Chief Executive, Dessie Farrell, returned
to this issue, repeating his call on the Government to provide tax incentives for
high-performance amateur athletes, a call he claims is supported "in principle"
by the Taoiseach. The GPA isn't everyone's cup of tea. Some high-profile players,
most recently Liam Dunne at the launch of his excellent autobiography I Crossed the Line,
have been scathing in their criticism of a body that is routinely accused of benefiting
only a tiny percentage of its members. But the GPA is, indisputably, articulating concerns
that the GAA would be foolhardy to disregard. Last year, it was estimated that GAA
activity across the country produced gate receipts in excess of E80million. This year's
inter-county championship receipts alone are expected to pass E35million. That money seeps
into many quarters.
As colleague, Eugene McGee, articulated in yesterday's paper, "Every chartered
physiotherapist, dietician, sports psychologist, statistician, masseur and so on, attached
to county teams gets paid top rates for their efforts and few could object to that in the
times we live in." No-one does. But the covert payment of managers is one
of the great hypocrisies of GAA life today. It is also, potentially, one of the most
inflammatory. When a manager, known to be getting handsome reward for training a
team, chooses to publicly question the commitment of his players, you are moving
perilously close to a Captain Bligh scenario. A sizeable percentage of managers
(both club and inter-county) are currently re-imbursed in ways that would draw gasps from
a Tribunal judge. Yet, they presume upon unquestioning commitment from their
players. And now that may just be becoming a dangerous presumption. There is another
dimension to this story too. How exactly do you imagine most GAA players responded to news
of James McCartan's acquisition of a criminal record? Triumphantly? Bear in mind that at virtually every GAA fixture played last weekend,
someone will have made a dangerous swing, just as 'When a manager, known to be getting
handsome reward for training a team, chooses to publicly question the commitment of his
players, you are moving perilously close to a Captain Bligh scenario' McCartan did to
Kenny Larkin. Worse, some will have done so with hurleys rather than fists. Mercifully,
no-one (as far as we are aware) ended up with an injury as serious as Larkin's. But some
were, quite probably, spared by a matter of inches. McCartan was never a
'hatchet-man'. Few corner-forwards are. But, in his career, he will have met and endured
his share of people who gave a fair impersonation of one. The damage he did to Kenny
Larkin can never be defended. But GAA culture doesn't exactly encourage the peaceable
route to on-field conflict. Think of last Sunday's "mass brawl" in Carlow. Those
two words "mass brawl" have become a routine punctuation mark on GAA
weekends. The truth is that many Gaelic footballers and hurlers won't quite know
what to feel about last week's court judgement against McCartan. Actually, most probably,
the words 'There but for the grace of God' will be coming to ferment in quite a few
minds. It's an odd and complex time for the GAA just now. A time of infinitely more
questions than answers.
Something's got to give.
What do you think ?
Air your views in the Forum |
| Possession from puck-outs is now a key factor in any side's tactical
plan. Michael Moynihan examines the modus operandi of Cork and Kilkenny. THE hurling
goalkeeper used to have a fairly straight-forward posting. He turned up on time, got a
different-coloured jersey, made a few breath-taking saves and tried to flake the rims off
the sliotar when pucking it out. This season that job description has changed: goalies
like Damien Fitzhenry and Donal Óg Cusack are quarter-backing their teams, providing
primary possession for forwards 80 yards away.
Then again, was it ever a matter of pucking the ball out with a big ignorant slap?
Donal Óg himself plays down the tactical element of the puck-out "People talk about
tactics, but I don't know if hurling is that kind of game" but concedes that
definition of the terms may be an issue: "Is tactics all about playing to your
strengths? If it is, then any goalkeeper in Ireland is going to play to his
strengths."
Damien Fitzhenry echoes the Cork keeper's outlook: "I suppose up to a few years
ago it was a case of hit and hope, you'd be trying to drive the ball as far as possible.
Nowadays, though, teams play to their strengths more. "Generally a goalkeeper has 25
to 30 puck-outs in the course of a game, and each of those is a chance to dictate the
play. If your team can win 60% of its own puck-outs then you're on the way to
victory."
Tipp's star keeper Brendan Cummins shares that view: "When you think about it, a
puck-out is a free shot, and in the modern game you can't waste possession. There's a lot
more work in training sessions on tactics and signals for the puck-out," he says.
"All of that's becoming more and more important. People don't realise the effort that
goes into getting the goalkeeper and his half-forward line, in particular, to work on the
same wavelength when it comes to the puck-out."
Cummins suggests that sometimes spectators may not be quite on that wavelength.
"If you're up in the stands you can maybe see a wing-forward who has 30 or 40 yards
of space in front of him, who's wide open. But there may be 16 players between that
wing-forward and his goalkeeper. With that kind of crowd, as keeper you rarely get a good
sight of the forward you're aiming at, so you're always looking for a nod from the
forward, or for him to point.
"The forward's hoping you can see his signal, you're hoping you'll be accurate
with the puck-out; there's a lot of hoping going on! That's where the hard work in
training comes in, getting players to tune into each other." Some teams, of course,
make you work that little bit harder than others. Cummins has talked in the past about the
difficulties of finding his men when playing Kilkenny: "Playing against them you're
looking at a line of big half-backs who are well able to catch the ball, so you're trying
to place waist-high ball into your wing-forwards, which is pretty difficult."
Fitzhenry concurs "Who'd disagree with Brendan?" and outlines Wexford's
strategy this year: "Apart from Tommy Walsh, who's well able to catch the ball, the
Kilkenny backs are all big strong men and well able to hurl. It's very difficult to pick
out your own men, because if you go low the Kilkenny half-forwards are tall enough to
intercept the puck-out. "We decided to open the game up and switch the puck-outs to
the wings, which worked well against Kilkenny. The only problem was that kind of tactic
can be a bit of a one-day wonder; Cork saw what we'd done against Kilkenny and were ready.
It's a tactic that doesn't necessarily work for you a second day."
Cummins acknowledges that Wexford effort against Kilkenny: "Nothing happens by
chance in a championship game and you can be sure Wexford put a lot of work into that
plan; they have relatively small forwards and their puck-outs had to find those
forwards." It's not all one-way traffic, of course. Fitzhenry and Cummins have also
admired the handiwork of their opposite number in black and amber. "Kilkenny have
players like Martin Comerford, John Hoyne and Henry Shefflin in their half-forward line,
all of them big men who are well able to win their own ball in the air," says
Fitzhenry. "James McGarry probably has the best options in that regard; after all, if
you're winning your puck-out by going long, then you'll keep going long."
Cummins goes even further: "When Kilkenny puck the ball out James McGarry doesn't
just hit it downfield. He has good options in front of him, particularly when Henry
Shefflin starts to drift to the right and John Hoyne comes into the centre. Those players
aren't stationary when they catch the ball either, they're always on the move."
Cummins and Fitzhenry have both played against Kilkenny's All-Ireland final opponents this
year and the Wexford man admires the Cork custodian's deliveries: "I think Donal Óg
Cusack is probably the most accurate keeper around from the puck-out. He'll be looking to
get the ball upfield as quickly, but as accurately, as he can."
CUMMINS goes a step further, defending his comrade in the keepers' union from the
criticism he received after the Munster Final. "Donal Óg Cusack tried short
puck-outs in the Munster final to Diarmuid O'Sullivan, who was probably only hitting it as
far as Donal Óg would have. Still, people who criticised Donal Óg should remember
firstly that there are more people than him involved in coming up with that strategy, if
it had to be changed, and two, that a team plays to a plan. People don't realise that.
Cork were probably trying to keep puck-outs away from the Waterford half-back line in that
game; dropping the ball into Ken McGrath's hand obviously wouldn't have been part of their
plan. You don't change the plan just like that, and it tells you something about the
discipline that Donal O'Grady has instilled in his team that they didn't try to change the
plan. The fact that Donal Óg didn't change it should also tell you something about the
confidence he had in that plan. It's that kind of discipline and confidence that gets you
to an All-Ireland final." Cummins notes one more crucial difference between the two
goalkeepers: "Of the two Donal Óg looks that little more alert to me, just that bit
busier. When the ball goes over the bar or wide against Cork he's always looking for
options, and the Cork defenders never turn their back on him. Even when the ball's gone
dead they're facing him they know he'll have a ball in his hand and he'll be looking
outfield. The Kilkenny backs tend to turn their backs on James McGarry, but then they're
probably expecting him to go long more or less all the time." As Cusack says, a
matter of playing to your strengths. |
|