SENATE SPEECHES
horizontal rule

Suicide Incidence: Statements.
18th November, 1999

Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Dr. Moffatt): I welcome this opportunity to make a statement on suicide in our society. As we are all aware, suicide has become a serious social problem. However, it is not confined to Ireland, but is a growing global problem. The number of deaths in Ireland attributed to suicide was 504 in 1998.

Suicide is now the most common cause of death among 15 to 24 year olds in Ireland, exceeding deaths due to cancer and road traffic accidents. Apart from the increase in the overall rate of suicide, a disturbing feature is the significant rise in the male suicide rate. Males accounted for 421 suicides out of a total of 504 in 1998. Young men and men aged 65 years and over are particularly at risk.

Why do people commit suicide? This is a complex issue. Suicidal behaviour demonstrates that something is fundamentally wrong either with the individual or with the situation in which the individual exists or with both the situation and the individual. Through information from relatives, it has become clear that most people who committed suicide had long lasting emotional problems, such as depression, anxiety, unhappy relationships, alcohol and drug-related problems, unemployment, feelings of loneliness and guilt, problems with relatives, etc. All this affirms that the factors which lead a person to take his or her life are of a long lasting nature.
In order to understand why people commit suicide we must take into consideration the individual's character traits, coping abilities, social support and life events. We also need to understand the social origins of individual emotional problems. In the early childhood of people who committed suicide, we often find broken homes, separation and divorce, loss of one or both parents, rape and sexual abuse, incest, domestic violence, alcohol abuse by parents, examination and peer pressure and other adverse life events. In later life, events such as sexual abuse and violence in the home may also be contributing factors in a person taking his or her life. There is evidence that suicide victims have experienced more of these traumatic events than others. Another social factor which needs to be considered is the availability of means to commit suicide. It is clear that stability in social relations and healthy cultural attitudes towards emotional problems are needed in the fight against suicide.

In the past there was an understandable reluctance to discuss the issue of suicide and this made the compilation of accurate data more difficult. This is now changing. The need for reliable and concrete information was one of the key factors in the establishment of the National Task Force on Suicide in 1995. The task force comprised 15 individuals from a range of backgrounds, including the coroner services, the Garda Síochána, nursing, psychiatry, psychology, public health and voluntary organisations. The terms of reference of the task force were to define numerically and qualitatively the nature of the suicide problem in Ireland, to define and quantify the problems of attempted suicide in Ireland, to make recommendations on how service providers can most cost effectively address the problems of attempted suicide and parasuicide, to identify the various authorities with jurisdiction in suicide prevention strategies and their respective responsibilities and to formulate, following consultation with all interested parties, a national suicide prevention/reduction strategy.

The task force carried out a detailed examination of the incidence of suicide and attempted suicide in Ireland. The task force report, published in January 1998, outlined a comprehensive strategy to reduce the incidence of suicide and attempted suicide. The key components of the overall strategy recommended by the task force are the implementation of measures aimed at high risk groups, provision of information and training on suicide prevention to relevant professionals and organisations and the importance of research and suicide prevention programmes. Following the publication of the task force report, the Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Cowen, contacted his ministerial colleagues in the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, the Department of Education and Science and the Department of the Environment and Local Government requesting that the necessary measures be put in place to ensure implementation of the recommendations which relate to their respective areas.

I will outline to the House the progress which has been made in implementing the recommendations of the task force that relate to the health services. Arising from the high incidence of suicide among young males and males over 65 years of age, priority has been given to the further development of mental health services for older people and child and adolescent psychiatric services. Resources totalling approximately £2.5 million were made available by my Department this year to enable improvements to be carried in each of these services. It is intended to allocate additional resources to enable these services to be further developed over the next few years. It is also intended to increase the level of capital funding available for the development of mental health facilities in the community to make services more accessible to people.

The Department also provided funding this year for the appointment of an additional consultant forensic psychiatrist in the Eastern Health Board. The person appointed to this post will liaise with the director of prison medical services and the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. The sessional commitments for the post will be five sessions at the Central Mental Hospital, three sessions in the prison service, Mountjoy Prison initially, and two sessions for risk assessment evaluations in the general psychiatric services. The post was advertised in July and the results of the selection process should be known by the end of this month. It is the intention of my Department to facilitate the Eastern Health Board in the further enhancement of its consultant forensic psychiatric services as resources permit.

A suicide research/review group has been established by the chief executive officers of the health boards. The establishment of this is central to the strategy to prevent and reduce suicide and attempted suicide and was a core recommendation of the task force report. Membership of the group includes experts in the areas of mental health, public health and research. The main responsibilities of the suicide research group are to review ongoing trends in suicide and parasuicide, to co-ordinate research into suicide and to make appropriate recommendations to the chief executive officers of health boards. To date, the group's research/review has covered a range of data, including current Central Statistics Office figures, the latest research material available, the new Garda report forms, Form 104, to the Central Statistics Office and the work of the newly established suicide committees and co-ordinators resource persons appointed in each health board area.

At an early stage in its deliberations the group recognised the need for research-resource support to assist it in carrying out the tasks covered by the report of the national task force on suicide. A sum of £5,000 has been provided by my Department this year for this purpose.

The research-resource officer will be involved in the collation of all existing research material, both national and international, and in making it available to the committee. He will also examine the effectiveness of intervention programmes and will liaise with local co-ordinators in each of the health boards on action plans based on experience both here and abroad.

The majority of health boards have established working groups to examine the implementation of the recommendations. The working groups are multisectoral and multidisciplinary and engage in the promotion of positive mental health and the destigmatisation of suicide, provide information in relation to suicide and parasuicide, liaise with the media and provide training requirements for staff in relation to all aspects of suicide and parasuicide. Resource officers with responsibility for implementing recommendations of the task force have been appointed in all health boards.

The National Suicide Research Foundation was founded in January 1995 by the late Dr. Michael J. Kelleher. Initially funded by the Department of Health and Children, the Southern Health Board and the Mid-Western Health Board, it became a unit of the Health Research Board in 1997. The foundation comprises a research team drawn from a broad range of disciplines. Personnel includes a project co-ordinator, research psychiatrist, statistician, research psychologist, research sociologist and data administrator. The primary aims of the NSRF are to define the true extent of the problem of suicidal behaviour in Ireland, to identify and measure the factors which induce and protect against suicidal behaviour and to develop strategies for the prevention of suicidal behaviour. The bulk of the foundation's work involves the monitoring of parasuicide as one of 26 centres across Europe that form part of the WHO-EURO multicentre study of parasuicide.

Parasuicide consists of any non-fatal act initiated deliberately by an individual in the knowledge that it may cause harm or death and includes both failed suicide attempts as well as acts where the individual has no intention to die. International studies have found parasuicide to be one of the most significant risk factors associated with suicide. Those who engage in parasuicide are 20 times more likely eventually to kill themselves. Studies have shown that at least one third of all suicides have a history of parasuicide.

The foundation has monitored every hospital-treated episode of parasuicide in the Southern Health Board and Mid-Western Health Board since 1995. Indepth interviews of individuals who have engaged in parasuicide have been carried out and these interviews are also being conducted in the community. This assists the foundation to identify risk and resilience factors relating to parasuicide. The NSRF has recently put forward a proposal for the national monitoring of suicide. Having national information on one of the groups at highest risk of suicide would contribute hugely to Ireland's suicide prevention strategy. It certainly appears appropriate that such research should be conducted and the proposal from the NSRF is currently under consideration by the suicide research group established by the CEOs of the health boards.

I assure Senators that the Government shares the public concern about the increase in suicides in this country. It is a worrying trend and we are fully committed to implementing the suicide prevention strategy recommended by the national task force and to developing other measures to help people who are at risk.

Mrs. Jackman: I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Moffatt, to the House. It is sad, as we approach Christmas, that it was necessary, as a result of recent deaths in Dublin prisons, to seek a debate on the question of young people committing suicide. I wonder if the young people who have just left the Public Gallery will remember their visit to the Seanad as the day when they heard a debate on a topic which should be very far from their young minds.

During my previous period in this House my colleague, Senator Dan Neville, did trojan work in bringing the issue of suicide before the public. He persisted and it is as a result of his work that we are debating this matter today. As president of the Irish Association of Suicidology, he constantly monitors and evaluates what is being done. This morning we held a very optimistic debate on the national development plan, but everything in our society is not right. We must place greater emphasis on people and on the need to support them.

As a teacher, I followed the careers of the young girls I had taught and wondered if intervention in the education system might have reached out to them and prevented future difficulties. Young boys are at a greater risk of suicide than girls. The Minister of State referred to the need for interventions within education. This is not a subject one would like to have to discuss with a class of bright young teenagers, but the issue must be touched on. The statistics quoted by the Minister - 421 males and 83 females, which is a 14% increase on the previous year, are shocking. In the past we thought that socio-economic pressures drove people to suicide, but this is not necessarily so. We never lived in such economically buoyant times as we do now and still the figures are going up. We must provide the resources necessary to ensure that health boards, the Department and the task force can detect people at risk of suicide and make the necessary intervention.

I do not forget prisons. I listened to a radio discussion the other day in which Dr. Charles Smith of the Central Mental Hospital appeared to differ with Dr. Ronan Ryder with regard to counselling of prisoners. Charles Smith seemed to think one would know the people who were suffering from mental illness and could deal with them appropriately. Research is needed for those not in that category.

The figure for youth suicide -120 per annum - is shocking. These suicides are predominantly male and suicide is now the greatest killer of young men. Some say that young men are not as ready as young women to accept the changes in society. Others feel that problems arise from the changing role of young males in society. When Finola Bruton referred to the fact that young men were a group at risk in our society she was attacked because of her concentration on that issue.

She was absolutely right in terms of equality. Sometimes we look at equality from the female perspective only but there must also be equality from the male perspective. She spoke about this because she knew that cohort was at risk. I am sure there are some in that socio-economic grouping who, while not suicidal, feel alienated and not in charge of their lives.

The statistics for the Limerick area are very sad. We have all, as politicians, attended funerals of suicide victims, which are most harrowing. What can one say to the parents, siblings and friends? The young people all go to those funerals and are shattered and shocked. They might have been out the night before with the individual and had hands-on contact with them. The individual boy - it is mostly boys - would not have been a recluse but would have been someone with whom they had been in contact the day before. They are shocked and horrified by these incidents. I was at a number of funerals in the Limerick area where I saw at first hand the devastation of family life. However, life goes on and the community looks after the young people and the parents, which is a good aspect of Irish life, and helps them to come to grips with such enormous tragedy, not just for the period of the funeral and the following weeks. There should, of course, be other interventions outside the normal neighbourly kindness and support, which is very helpful.

According to a Dáil reply to a question on the up-to-date statistics for Limerick, 12 males and five females, a total of 17, committed suicide in 1997. Those figures increased to 19 males and three females, a total of 22. It is quite frightening to see that 39 children in the ten to 19 age group - an age when the world is their oyster - committed suicide in 1996 and 53 did so in 1998, which is a huge increase. In 1998 there were 100 suicides in the 30 to 39 year old age group. There is also an increased incidence of suicide among older people due to loneliness or whatever. In the 50 to 64 year old age group - a time when people should be enjoying the hard earned fruits of their work - the figure increased from 58 to 73 in 1998. Between 1996 and 1998 the figure increased from 409 to 504 suicides, an increase of almost 100. That is absolutely shocking. According to the Central Statistics Office, the incidence has increased in the Mid-Western Health Board region from 13.1 to 14 per 100,000 of the population.

Young people are exposed to social and psychological pressures, one aspect of which is the instability of family life. I am sure that is a reason for suicide in every country. Questions must be asked as to why so many young people are suffering from depression and feel so utterly despairing. That area must be researched.

Suicide has an effect not only on the parents but on the entire family unit. Health boards need to have a multidisciplinary team available, as requested, to assist both the family and the community which has been bereaved by a member who felt in such despair that he or she decided to take his or her life.

The Samaritans have given marvellous service. They are very caring and unselfish. However, we should not expect voluntary associations, such as the Samaritans, to be always there to help, as happened in the past. We need support from general practitioners, the clergy, the Garda and individual bereavement counsellors and health boards. Such people need further training because we are learning more about the reasons for the higher incidence of suicide. We must ensure there is training for the people involved, such as GPs, clergymen, gardaí and teachers, so that they have the necessary skills to understand and respond to the deep crisis suffered by the bereaved in the aftermath of the death of a loved one.

I could spend a lot of time talking about the supports necessary for the bereaved. That should be taken on board. Life goes on but the needs of the family must be addressed. It should not be the case that nothing is done after a prison suicide or otherwise hits the headlines. I was glad, in a sense, to hear women being interviewed about their sons the other day. However, why is it always women who have to come to the fore? This also hurts fathers. Perhaps it would be good if the fathers could talk about these issues, especially when the incidence of suicide is so high among the male population. The Minister referred to the report of the national task force on suicide which was published in 1998. I referred to the community multidisciplinary psychiatric services and training. Input is also needed for teachers.

When I refer to teachers, I am also talking about teachers at third level. Many students at third level institutions are removed from the support structures of home and may feel further alienated. The chaplain in the University of Limerick is a wonderful young priest who has brought this into the open. Every year he celebrates special masses and provides special supports. He gets such a large congregation of young people at mass on Sunday night that one cannot get into the church. That shows what can happen when someone addresses this issue in a third level institution, where people can feel alienated, and provides a support structure. Students can turn to the church, which is often lambasted. This particular clergyman is invaluable to the University of Limerick in terms of the support he provides.

There is controversy about initiating programmes aimed at teaching children about positive health issues, including coping strategies and basic information about positive mental health. We had those programmes in our school in Limerick. It was very important to have that discussion.

There is also controversy about how the press reports individual suicides. There should be dialogue between the Department of Health and Children and the press - perhaps there already is - to ensure positive reporting. Some parents have said to me that the constant reporting of suicide in the press encourages young people to do the same. Has that area been researched?

The Department of Health and Children should also address the psychological needs of older people. That must be met headlong. I have given statistics on the increased incidence of suicide among older people. Is it the view that adults are supposed to just get on with their lives? Older people can be isolated and it is essential that they receive counselling and social intervention. The elderly were mentioned during the debate on the national development plan. I was shocked by the statistic that 200,000 people - I could be corrected on that statistic - will spend Christmas alone this year, prior to the new millennium about which everyone is talking so enthusiastically. That level of isolation is shocking. There should be community intervention in that regard and people should look in on their elderly neighbours. I can imagine how one would feel if one were alone. Most of those people were on their own the year after the death of their spouse. That is a shocking indictment of Irish life. We must look out for these things. Perhaps we are moving into a very fast society which is consumer oriented and we are forgetting we are supposed to help each other. These matters should be considered.

I look forward to a debate on this issue when we are not just reacting to the increased incidence of suicide. The Oireachtas Joint Committee on Health and Children, of which I am a member, should debate this on a regular basis rather than just responding when we hear of another death.

We must deal with this as politicians on an ongoing basis to ensure that no section of society lacks the much needed interventions to help them to cope and to avoid the harrowing choice of taking one's life which really saddens all of us.

Dr. Fitzpatrick: I welcome this debate and the Minister's presence. Listening to the contributions, I cannot help but think that irony is piling upon irony. This is probably the best and most hopeful time to be alive in Ireland's history, yet the incidence of suicide is rising exponentially with a 25% increase in two years from 1996 to 1998. There is roughly a four to one male to female ratio. A total of 504 suicides took place in 1998. It is especially prevalent in young men, who belong to the age group who have most to look forward to in life, who have everything before them, yet appear to turn their backs on life and on society.

The interesting thing I find as a doctor is that there is absolutely no means of predicting who will commit suicide. I have been shocked time and again by the patients of mine who have committed suicide, people who had no reason to do it, who were happily married, in good homes and with everything going well. They just do it. Of course great personal shock and trauma is caused to those they leave behind. When I was preparing for this debate, I read somewhere that approximately ten people are affected by every suicide. I am sure it is much more. These people are devastated. A father and mother see their child commit suicide. The parents and siblings ask if there was something they missed in the person who commited suicide. They are still unable to come up with answers.

I welcome the Minister's speech and his proposals to deal with suicide in Irish society. It is amazing that more people take their own lives than are killed on the roads. Yet another irony is that approaching Christmas an anti-drink driving and anti-dangerous driving campaign will be mounted which will last throughout the festive season, as it does every year, and then stop. It does not really appear to have much effect on the incidence of road traffic deaths year after year. Why do we not take this approach to suicide, which takes our best and, in many cases, our brightest?

I take the point made by Senator Mary Jackman that we are beginning to discuss this topic but there is or was a stigma in society attaching to suicide. I am old enough to remember a neighbour of mine being taken from the hospital to the graveyard without any church service. That was in my lifetime. It has changed a lot but we need to discuss it more openly. We need to stop hiding the problem.

The point is made that if there was more media coverage of suicide it might encourage more people to take their own lives. I do not think so. It should be exposed more and its causes examined. This is not a medical problem and we should not even dream of medicalising it. It is a societal problem and should be tackled by a broad range of interests and skills.

I am glad the NSRF is trying to define the true extent of the problem of suicidal behaviour in Ireland. They have demolished one of the prevalent myths, especially in the medical profession over the years, that people who attempt suicide never really go on to commit suicide. The Minister's speech indicated that parasuicidal people, that is people who attempt it, are 20% more at risk than people who do not. That is an interesting and frightening statistic. It should always put people like myself, nurses and anybody who deals with the care of people, on their guard against this.

Why do people commit suicide? There are probably as many answers as there are suicides. One answer is the rate of change in our society which has never been faster. The old certainties with which I was brought up, certainly those of a patriarchal and hierarchical society, are gone forever. Children leaving school now are expected to be educated adults, able to handle everything society throws at them. Not all people are like that. Even as we get older we find it difficult to handle some of the changes in society.

I do not want to blame schools for this or put the onus on them because schools have to do a lot that they are not really equipped to do or should not be doing. Children should be educated outside the narrow confines of the leaving certificate instead of being told, "You must get six As if you want to get into medical school" or whatever. One never needed those things to be a normal member of society. Maybe we should be training them in more societal skills and boosting their self-esteem or self-confidence. We do not do that. We are becoming a society in one way that puts people down, that focuses on the personality. Take our profession - since when did the media and ourselves discuss policy without personalising that policy or the person behind the policy? This is wrong. Older people or middle aged people like myself can live with this but young people cannot. Not all of them can take these pressures and this is one of the reasons for the high suicide incidence in the 15 to 24 age group.

I said before that reducing suicide is not simply a matter for psychiatrists or general practitioners. There are wider social and cultural issues which must also be examined. We must look to other countries. We do not have the highest suicide rate as Finland does but they have mounted a multi-disciplinary approach to dealing with the causes of suicide. It is a slow process and they are finding it extremely difficult to get to grips with it but they are attempting anyway. We are beginning the attempt. They have progressed further that we have. They are examining what motivates suicidal behaviour such as lack of confidence or being unprepared for independent living. Young men rather then young women are not well prepared for independent living. They seem to need the home background in their lives longer than young women.

It will be interesting to see over the next few years whether the Celtic tiger and the resulting decrease in unemployment will lead to a reduction in suicide statistics. We will not know that for four or five years. One of the theories advanced for the increase in suicide in Ireland was the lack of work and the feeling of inadequacy people had because they were not working. Because they were signing on, they felt they were not making a contribution to their family or their society. We will know within the next four or five years whether being out of work and not making a meaningful contribution leads to an increase in suicide.

As for primary care - psychiatric and psychological services have to be made more accessible. They are not at the moment, although there is an improvement coming. Those who are dealing with suicide should be well trained, highly skilled and non-judgmental. We do not have enough of them and we need more. We have spent a fortune seeking to reduce the number of road traffic accidents but we have not spent the same amount seeking to reduce the incidence of suicide.

The incidence of depression has increased considerably and it is considered that this has led to an increase in the incidence of suicide. I am not certain about this. It appears there is an increased feeling of inadequacy among young males, in particular, in the milieu in which they live. This should be addressed. Doctors, nurses and psychiatrists have a part to play in the non-medicalisation of the problem.

There are wider issues which militate against individuals seeking help. To remove the stigma there is a need for an ongoing debate on mental health to educate the public, not just doctors, on the causes of suicide. When the matter is discussed openly those suffering from depression or who feel inadequate will realise that they are not unusual and will seek help. Greater publicity can play a part in reducing the incidence of suicide.

Many of the barriers to suicidal or parasuicidal behaviour have been removed in recent years. What this means is that some individuals are more likely to engage in such behaviour when they feel distressed. This generation is not prepared or able to withstand pressures withstood by a previous generation.

I hope we will revisit this matter, which we could debate all day, because it is a major problem in society.

Dr. Henry: In case a crowd gathers on the other side of the House I wish to share my time with Senator Norris.

An Cathaoirleach: Is that agreed? Agreed.

Dr. Henry: I sometimes think that statements from the Department of Health and Children are specifically written to increase my sense of paranoia but that cannot be said of the speech delivered by the Minister of State. I agree with virtually all of it, apart from the usual phrase, "Services will be increased as resources permit". We spent this morning describing ourselves as billionaires and working out how we will spend all the money available. The resources are available and there should no longer be any need to include that excuse.

I compliment Senators Jackman and Fitzpatrick on covering much of this topic so eloquently. I will try to avoid dealing with the same points. What they had to say was very important and relevant. This is a serious public health issue which appears to be confined to the rich, developed world. There has been an appalling increase in the incidence of suicide in the western world, particularly among young males and older persons. As well as looking at the good work being done by the national task force on suicide we should also look at the work being done internationally, in particular by the task force established by the Surgeon General in the United States of America. Under the chairmanship of Mrs. Gore, it has done considerable work not just on suicide risk but also on the protection that can be provided at community level.

It is important not to develop a collective attitude of despair to the problem. This would not be helpful. I indicated the other day that sometimes, for unknown reasons, problems which appear to be increasing regress. For example, in the early 1990s there was a dramatic increase in teenage pregnancies but between 1997 and 1998 the Eastern Health Board reported a 30% decrease which was not attributable to an increase in the number in that age group who travel to England for an abortion. It was most likely due to an improvement in the economy. All the issues involved must be looked at to ascertain the risk factors involved and the protection that can be provided at community level to prevent individuals feeling that suicide is the answer to their problems.

Senator Fitzpatrick indicated that there is a lack of access to services which may be in a position to help, such as psychological counselling and psychiatric services. This must be tackled as a matter of urgency. Voluntary organisations, such as the Samaritans, which were rightly praised by Senator Jackman are often stretched beyond their capacity. Those suffering from substance and alcohol abuse in particular find it difficult to obtain help. It is outrageous that there is perhaps a six month's waiting list for those who wish to take part in a methadone treatment programme. Substance and alcohol abuse are high risk factors when it comes to suicide.

Mental health and depression in particular were mentioned by the Minister of State and Senator Fitzpatrick. I attended a meeting in Geneva recently at which it was indicated that the World Health Organisation expects depression to be the most common illness in the western world within a short space of time. This is unbelievable. What is worse is that there is a lack of access to treatment. At primary level general practitioners should have sufficient time for consultations with patients. Senator Fitzpatrick said that he was sometimes astounded at the patients of his who committed suicide. A high proportion of those who commit suicide come in contact with their general practitioner a short time before they take their lives. It is important, therefore, that general practitioners have sufficient time to be able to realise that a patient who appears to be suffering from a somatic problem is in fact suffering from a mental illness. Senator Fitzpatrick is correct that there is still a stigma attached to mental illness to which we must adopt a better attitude to ensure those suffering from depression carefully explain their symptoms and seek help.

Another group which has not been discussed is the homeless. Are they homeless because they are suffering from a psychiatric illness or is it because of the breakdown of relationships within the homes from which they came? I have frequently mentioned that I live near Baggot Street Hospital in which a drug treatment centre is located. The number of homeless people that I trip over on my way home, in particular boys under the age of 18 for whom no hostel accommodation is available, is horrific. How important is this to those who feel, quite rightly, that they are in despair and perhaps take their own lives?

I was delighted to hear from the Minister's speech that the incidence of parasuicide is being investigated, but I am inclined to doubt this because accident and emergency departments are stretched beyond belief and I wonder are all those who go in really dealt with as carefully as they should be? Are some of them referred back to a general practitioner or to a psychiatrist? I would like to think that parasuicide is followed up as carefully as the Minister says, but I am inclined to think it is not.

Another issue which has been tackled only recently - I compliment Mona O'Moore in Trinity College for addressing it over the past 20 years - is the issue of bullying in society. Jacinta Kitt has undertaken a study of bullying in the workplace and has done a considerable amount of research into its effects on people who commit suicide. Scandinavian research suggests that between 10% and 20% of people who commit suicide have been subject to bullying of a serious nature within the previous year, bullying in the workplace being quite common. This has not been addressed until very recently and I am delighted Mrs. Kitt has taken it upon herself to address trade unions and other institutions about this problem.

Senator Fitzpatrick was quite right when he said that we seem to have a national problem in terms of praising people. It is sometimes felt that it is far better to denigrate people. We never seem to go by that great old proverb "Mol an óige agus tiocfaidh sí". People feel it is better to try to put people down. I wonder how frequently this is the case with those who are bullied. Relationship bullying is a feature, for example, within a family one person may be the victim and within society a whole family can be bullied, isolated and indeed boycotted within a community. How much resources are we putting forward into developing family and community relationships? We are doing very little to help in this regard.

I have expressed great annoyance about the proposals to reduce the numbers of people working on community employment schemes. Some of these are people from within the community working as assistants in schools and so forth. Perhaps these are some of the best people to recognise where there is a breakdown within a family because they come from the community and they recognise where a family within that community has problems. This should be promoted rather than withdrawing very small amounts of money which will be of little benefit in terms of the national plan. A more co-ordinated approach is necessary, not only by the Department of Health and Children. We should look more carefully at what is happening in other Departments in dealing with this matter.

Prison suicides must be mentioned because we all have responsibility for that since it is because of society that these people are in prison. A large number of us would consider that many people in prison would be far better off if they were dealt with by the probation service. There are just over 200 probation officers who are expected to deal with all situations. Instead of building more prisons, there should be a significant increase in the number of probation officers.

Mr. Norris: Hear, hear.

Dr. Henry: If people commit suicide within prisons there is a definite responsibility on those who have encouraged the increased imprisonment of people. The last young man who committed suicide was in prison for three months for stealing a £40 coat. What is the value of a three month prison sentence? I do not know and from what I read, it appears to be very little.

Senator Jackman referred to Dr. Ronan Ryder. As he and numerous people have said for years, there is a lack of psychiatric services in prisons, which is appalling. It is not sufficient to employ one more forensic psychiatrist? The resources are there and there needs to be a considerable increase in psychiatric services. It has been suggested that 30% of the prison population have psychiatric disease and 10% have serious psychiatric disease. The number of people who are in seclusion and padded cells in Mountjoy Prison because the authorities have not been able to send them to the Central Mental Hospital is appalling.

I wonder whether in my lifetime whether the Government will provide time to debate the report of the inspector of mental hospitals. I doubt it very much, even though I have raised the matter for the past two years.

Mr. Costello: It is promised.

Dr. Henry: It is promised like the millennium. The section on the Central Mental Hospital in this report is very bad. The whole area is totally demoralised and money needs to be spent there.

School services also need to be addressed. There is a dire shortage of school psychologists and psychiatrists and it is quite appalling to hear of school children committing suicide, and frequently, as stressed in the Minister's speech, there are problems at family level.

The elderly must not be forgotten in terms of loneliness and lack of money. Thankfully, there will be a large amount of money in the budget for the elderly. We must ensure there is better counselling for the elderly who have been recently bereaved because, all too often following a death, within a short length of time the person left behind feels that life is intolerable and not worth living, and they take their lives.

My only criticism is about resources. The resources are available and we must implement the necessary recommendations.

Mr. Norris: I want to make one point as forcefully as I can. There is an extraordinary disproportion in the suicide mortality figures for young males. Within that there is a particular group that is simply not mentioned, that is ignored, that is young gay men. Something must be done about this, but nobody is doing anything. There is no question of doubt, it is coyly categorised under "sexuality" as one of the problems that arise. I have no doubt that a very high proportion of young gay males commit suicide because of confusion about their sexual identity, because of internalised feelings of shame and oppression, because of marginalisation. I commend the Minister and his advisers in regard to the excellent report produced by the Gay Men's Health Project in association with Combat Poverty Agency on marginalisation, exclusion and deprivation. All these things affect the gay community, particularly young people.

This House initiated changes in the law to decriminalise homosexual behaviour, but that takes a long time to follow through in terms of social acceptance. Frequently young people are confused about issues of sexuality, regardless of whether they are gay. If they are gay it is a hundred times worse. If we are serious about combating suicide, this aspect must be considered. I pay tribute to the counselling services that exist within the gay community and groups like the Samaritans. They have done an immense amount of good work and this is vital.

There was a remarkable woman on the radio this morning. She was of Irish extraction and she was governor of a large British prison. She spoke very movingly about a young woman who had committed suicide at the age of 42 after a predictable and ghastly career in crime. She spoke about how she had become friendly with this woman and that at the funeral service another inmate spoke about their situation. The governor said that she had discovered that almost all the inmates of the prisons she worked in and all the suicide victims were people who had been abused, marginalised, had feelings of low self-esteem and so on, and the one thing they needed and ached for was somebody to listen to them. Even in threatening situations, where there are threats to either the lives of prisoners or the lives of prison staff, it is remarkable to be able to sit down with prisoners as this woman did. She said the most regrettable thing is to be powerless. She is a small, slight woman and she very often sat down with prisoners, who were threatening themselves or her, in order to be at a lower level than them, and gave them the opportunity to talk. The caring services do much work in this regard.

I am grateful to my colleague, Senator Henry, for allowing me a few minutes to make this point. If we are serious, we must not exclude from consideration the highly vulnerable group of young people who used to be mentioned, though I have not seen one mention of them over the past year in any of the statistics, reports or debates. Why have they been ignored? They need to be listened to and understood, to be talked out of the feelings of shame and low self-esteem that lead them tragically to take their own lives.

Mr. Costello: Senator Norris's point is valid. Young gay men are a vulnerable group in society who find themselves in situations which are fundamentally more difficult for them than for other males in society. They are particularly prone to depression, to difficulties with self-esteem and so on. They are, therefore, a particularly at-risk group that should be looked at.

It is amazing that the rates of suicide as between males and females are so disproportionate. Of a total of 504 suicides in 1998, 421 were of males, and the vast majority of those were in the younger age group. Suicide deaths were concentrated among those between 15 and 24 years and among the over 65s. Young and the old are at risk, and males, young and old, are at most risk. That is deserving of considerable examination.

Deputy Neville, a former Senator, was largely responsible for the crusade to decriminalise suicide, and it was this House that introduced that legislation. Nevertheless, the rate of suicide in Ireland, and among younger males in particular, is very high compared with our European counterparts. There are elements of society, therefore, that need thorough investigation to discover why this should be so.

What is interesting is that the figures have not changed substantially. In this Celtic tiger era levels of suicide are not decreasing, yet the levels of suicide in the pre-Celtic tiger era were also very high. When the economy is booming the position is much the same as when the economy was in a dire state in the 1970s and 1980s. I wonder why that is so. One would have thought that attitudes and the ethos of our society had changed, that there would have been a dramatic change in the population's perception of itself vis-à-vis self-esteem and its situational context. It is becoming obvious that there must be a two-tiered society and that for a very large number of people nothing has changed in the intervening period, that is to say, the 1990s are not significantly different from the 1980s.

It would be interesting to analyse the categories of people to see what areas of society they come from, whether a booming economy has had any relevance to their lives or has increased the difficulty and vulnerability of their positions because they are not being carried along by the boom and their loss of self-esteem is, therefore, probably all the greater. I would be interested in what the Minister might have to say in relation to those social circumstances which one would have thought had changed fundamentally and, therefore, fundamentally changed social disadvantage, low self-esteem and so on.

Individual areas have been referred to. Homelessness is growing at an inordinate rate, even though our society is getting so much richer. The numbers of homeless have more than doubled in the past three years. Many young people are homeless, particularly in cities. Anybody who is homeless is extremely vulnerable to all sorts of depredations and they must be on a roller coaster from day to day in terms of their perception of themselves. They are clearly a very vulnerable category.

Bullying in the workplace and at school seems to be increasing at an rapid rate, or perhaps it is just that we are recognising that it exists as a major problem. It is impinging greatly on many young people. In schools there is a huge problem that is being recognised only now. Young people are extremely vulnerable given their stage of development and they can be very unsure of themselves and confused in their personal lives.

Senator Henry referred to community employment schemes. The attack on community employment schemes is an attack on the most disadvantaged sector of our society, people who cannot get into the mainstream workforce. Taking away their ability to get out of the home and meet people is a very serious matter in their perception of themselves and their own mental capacity at a particular time and can have a tremendous bearing on their sense of themselves.

The issue of suicides in prison has also been referred to. As in the wider community, we are totally out of line with the rest of Europe in the context of our prisons. We have always had a disproportionate number of people inflicting injury on themselves or taking their own lives in prison compared with other European countries. The rate here is well over double the European average. There must be reasons for this. We have heard much criticism in recent times and in the past month alone three people have taken their own lives in prisons. That is a huge number, proportionately speaking. We know the individual circumstances in each case, why they were in prison and they varied in every case.

One can argue that there is a lack of psychiatric services in our prisons or that there are no proper induction procedures. When somebody arrives in prison all they have is a simple physical examination. Nobody checks their mental condition or checks to find out whether they have been undergoing treatment of any description in the community. They may meet a doctor for a couple of minutes at most during their first week in prison, but there is no thorough examination, nobody to sit down with them, to counsel them and find out what their personal problems might be. We do not have an induction system in our prisons and most of the deaths that take place occur within a short period of people going to prison.

I am amazed that the authorities have never focused on that aspect of prison suicides. People who go to prison are vulnerable. They may be drug addicts, they may be alcohol dependent and they all come from disadvantaged areas. Very few of the people we read about in connection with the tribunals end up in prison because white-collar criminals do not go to prison. It is a simple statistic. It is the most vulnerable people in society who end up in prison. That is why I believe it is the two-tier society that is causing problems in society generally. Nothing has changed in the prisons. I suspect nothing has changed in society in relation to the categories of people who end up taking their own lives or inflicting injury on themselves, because disadvantaged areas are still very neglected. Is there a reason we cannot have an induction system for people entering prison? That system would examine the circumstances in which prisoners arrive and counsel them at the outset or have somebody present who would determine their state of mind and whether they were at risk.

Would it be possible to put the prisons' medical service under the aegis of the local health board in which the prison is located? Is there any reason we should not have a parallel system to that operated by the vocational education committees throughout the country? The City of Dublin VEC takes care of Mountjoy, Arbour Hill and Wheatfield and Limerick City VEC has the same responsibility for the prison in Limerick in terms of educational and training requirements. We should have the same standard of education in prisons as that which operates outside prisons. Professionals should be in charge of this and prisoners should be dealt with through a scheme which operates in the community. Prisoners should be directed towards the schools and colleges on release. Can we not put a similar system in place in relation to the health services in the prisons?

Why are a small number of doctors in private practice dealing with prisoners? Why can we not bring this area under the aegis of the health board? There is no reason the Eastern Health Board cannot be responsible for the health of prisoners in Mountjoy. That would be the preference of Dr. Ronan Ryder who made remarks to that effect in a recent address. It is the approach we need to take when dealing with suicide, drug abuse or any other condition which is fundamentally a health issue and concerns the well-being of the person.

I am glad we had the opportunity to debate suicide. As the Minister of State said in his contribution, it is the cause of more deaths in society than road traffic accidents. We hear about those virtually on a daily basis and there is much reference in the media to the need to take action to address that problem. Despite the establishment of the task force, which reported last year, we have not put together a comprehensive approach to dealing with the problem of suicide. It should be on the agenda of the House on a regular basis so that the Minister can have an opportunity to report progress on it.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach When is it proposed to sit again?

Mr. T. Fitzgerald: Next Tuesday, 23 November, at 12.30 p.m.

Adjournment Matters.

Dublin Institute of Technology.

Mr. Costello: It is a matter of considerable concern in the education sector that we cannot report any substantial progress on the acquisition of the site at St. Brendan's psychiatric unit by the Dublin Institute of Technology. In 1992, when this issue was first mooted on a serious basis, it was decided that Collins Barracks would be considered as the site for the headquarters of the new DIT, established the previous year under legislation. The DIT was separated from the City of Dublin VEC and the intention was that it would be a stand alone institution with six faculties covering the whole gamut of education. It does not have a headquarters or a campus. It is a floating institution and it has been floating even more since the legislation was passed. It needs to be anchored somewhere in the city.

The DIT has colleges in Mountjoy Square, Cathal Brugha Street, Kevin Street, Rathmines and Bolton Street but there is no cohesion. Since it was established on a statutory basis in 1991, the DIT has been seeking a location to set up its headquarters and gradually bring in its outlying faculties. It intended to start with music, areas of architecture, a student campus and a major student hall. The site which is available has large playing fields which would be ideal for the student population as well as the local population.

We could have discussed this issue in the debate on suicide because many patients in St. Brendan's have been sent out into the community without the necessary back-up resources. Many of those people are vulnerable in society. This land is available and it is not being used by any institution. I understand approximately 75 acres have been earmarked for this development. The Eastern Health Board owns the land and it would be simply a question of agreeing a reasonable price among the various State agencies and transferring ownership to the Department of Education and Science. The Department could then begin the construction of its new premises.

Every year I am told that funding will be made available for this project. It has not happened to date and there is much concern among the principals and staff in these faculties as well as the student body which is now engaged in a campaign to have action taken. I understand the Taoiseach is very interested in the project and with £40.6 billion in the bag for the national development plan, it would take very small change to enable this major institution have a proper home. I ask the Minister of State to outline the up to date position and I hope he will give me a date for the acquisition of this site.

Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Dr. Moffatt): I thank Senator Costello for raising this issue. The Dublin Institute of Technology has a number of major sites located throughout the city of which Aungier Street, Bolton Street, Cathal Brugha Street, Kevin Street and Mountjoy Square are the most well known. The DIT currently has some 100,000m2 of accommodation with the likelihood of additional accommodation being brought on stream at Aungier Street within the next two years. The analysis undertaken for the master plan indicates that the application of reasonable norms to the current position would suggest that proper space requirements are much higher. This is an issue which impinges directly on the quality of service which the institute provides and the desire of the institute to provide student accommodation, playing fields and recreational facilities for its 21,000 students. Specific areas needing improvements are office accommodation for staff, library facilities, laboratory and workshop facilities and the social and recreational facilities for students.

The institute is nearing the end of the first phase of its reorganisation along faculty lines and already it is apparent that the future efficiency of these structures will depend in large measure on the integration of faculties on to single sites. The site at St. Brendan's psychiatric unit, Grangegorman, is no Ionger required by the Eastern Health Board and would meet the requirements of DIT for additional space. The Department is actively considering the purchase of this site for DIT in the context of the annual Estimates over the next number of years, and possibly in the context of a public private partnership.

The Senator will be aware that such a proposal will require substantial funding and thorough planning. However, the lands at Grangegorman could permit DIT to develop a north and south city campus, which is in keeping with its masterplan. The latter would centre on existing facilities in Kevin Street and Aungier Street and would house the faculties of science and business. The north city campus would focus on Bolton Street and Grangegorman, retaining in the medium term the existing facilities for tourism and food at Cathal Brugha Street. It is envisaged by the institute that the widely dispersed faculty of applied arts, currently spread over 15 centres, would be relocated at Grangegorman, and the faculty of built environment would be moved there from its current position in Bolton Street. This latter transfer would enable the faculty of engineering to be centralised on the Bolton Street site. Unfortunately I cannot give Senator Costello the exact date he requested but they are moving in the right direction. I will raise the issue again with the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Martin.

Mr. Costello: But are they moving?

Capital Acquisitions Tax.

Mr. Cosgrave: I appreciate that the Minister of State is not directly concerned with this matter but I hope he will pass my comments to the relevant Minister. I wish to raise the application of capital acquisitions tax, otherwise known as inheritance and gift tax, on dwellings and how certain classes of relatives are treated under this tax. The current tax thresholds are totally inadequate given the massive increase in house prices. During this period the thresholds have only been raised by very small amounts while house prices have doubled or trebled.

I accept that in the run up to the budget there are many conflicting and worthy demands. I am sure the Minister of State has received many such demands in the Department of Health and Children. However, I am particularly concerned about how certain classes of relatives are dealt with under this tax. My proposals repeat the suggestions outlined by the Opposition spokesperson on finance, Deputy Noonan. One proposal is for the exemption of the family home from inheritance tax in circumstances where the beneficiary lives in the family home and it is his or her principal residence on the date prior to the death of the disponer. I am also seeking the reduction of the three class thresholds to two by amalgamating the two class thresholds regarding relatives. This would also encompass an increase in the exemption limit from £192,800 to £400,000 for the new class A, and from £20,000 to £30,000 for the new class B. There is also a proposal for a more benign regime for the transfer of farms and businesses.

It is clear that the exemption thresholds for inheritance tax have not kept pace with house price inflation. Many houses in Dublin which were purchased for less than £90,000 in the late 1980s are now worth £300,000, £400,000 and even £500,000. I will give an example of a middle aged woman who gave up work to look after her aged widowed mother. When her father died seven years ago the family home was worth £98,000. This woman's mother died last August and left her the family home and a small sum of money. When the funeral expenses were paid there was less than £1,000 left. The house is now worth £350,000 and this woman faces an inheritance tax bill of over £60,000. She has no money to pay the tax and, as she is not working, she does not have an income on which to raise a mortgage to pay the bill.

This woman has been an unpaid carer. As the Minister of State knows, these people receive much lip service but little practical help. If she sells her house she will not be able to purchase a cheaper house in the same area and may have to move to a different area, living behind friends and relatives she has known for a long time.

There are a number of issues which must be examined. We must look at the issue of siblings who live together, some of whom are on pensions, and live in a house they inherited or bought many years ago for a small sum of money but which is now worth several hundred thousand pounds. The sibling relationship is not dealt with satisfactorily by CAT as the threshold is far too low. There should be exemptions from CAT on inheritance of a family home where the deceased and the beneficiary both lived in the house as their principal residence immediately before the death of the deceased. The relief would apply to inheritance, not a gift. The category of beneficiaries should be extended to include unmarried couples in long or short-term relationships, including second marriages, children, and brothers and sisters living together. This provision would be subject to certain clawbacks and relief.

The need for change in this area speaks for itself, particularly in light of the increase in property values. There have been many hardship cases. Brothers and sisters, or children and parents who lived in a house for a long time, particularly if one has been a carer, should not have to sell the home and move ten or 15 miles away to get a new house. This case stands on its merits and I ask the Minister of State to respond positively or to raise this issue with the Minister for Finance.

Dr. Moffatt: The Minister for Finance is acutely aware of the difficulties many people now face as a result of the payments they must make under capital acquisitions tax when they inherit the home in which they may have lived for many years.

During the course of the debate on the most recent Finance Act, the Minister made it clear that he would undertake a review of the workings of the capital acquisitions tax system, which includes inheritance tax, to see what could be done to alleviate the problems. Of course these problems stem essentially from the very rapid increases in house prices that has taken place in recent years. This trend in house price inflation has been particularly evident in the greater Dublin area, but many other parts of the country have also been affected by it. Happily the indexes of the various agencies that monitor house prices are now showing that the rate of increase in house price inflation is beginning to decelerate. It would appear that an increase in the supply of dwellings may be starting to make an impact on the market.

The review the Minister promised in relation to capital acquisitions tax is in progress at present, but Senators will appreciate that it would be most inappropriate at a point so close to the unveiling of the budget to lay out for this House any action that the Government may decide to take on foot of this review. However, the Minister asked me to assure Senators that he is conscious of the need for the review to be sensitive to many different types of relationships and the need for equity to the greatest degree possible in any resolution of the matter. Senators will be aware that there are a great many different relationship types in our present-day society. This issue was discussed at some length by Seanad Éireann on Committee Stage of the Finance Act earlier this year. At that time the Minister of State, Deputy O'Dea, who was representing the Minister for Finance, gave certain commitments to the House. While more contemporary relationship patterns may get much of the attention when this matter is discussed, there are other more traditional types of relationships that must also be kept in mind.

Senator Cosgrave addressed in particular the treatment of inheritances between brothers and sisters. Siblings living together in the family home is a traditional type of relationship that has been fairly common in Ireland for a great many years. All of us know of many such situations. However, much has already been to done to reform the capital acquisitions tax code in the area of sibling inheritances. Senators should be aware that amendments have been made to the code in order to provide special reliefs for siblings in defined circumstances. Beginning with the Finance Act, 1991, the special circumstances of elderly siblings living together were given statutory recognition. That Act provided for an easing in the tax burden in circumstances where a house is inherited from a co-sibling. In the 1998 budget this relief was extended for the purposes of calculating the liability to capital acquisitions tax. This was done by way of a reduction in the value of the residence by 80% or £150,000, whichever is the lesser. To qualify for the relief a number of conditions must be fulfilled. The recipient must be a brother or sister of the sibling who gave the house - the person giving the property is known as the disponer - the recipient must have reached the age of 55 years, the recipient must have lived in the house with the disponer continuously for a period of five years or more before the date of the inheritance and, finally, the recipient must not be the beneficial owner or part-owner of any other house. The effect of the legislative provisions is to reduce the level of tax that would otherwise be payable when a sibling inherits from a co-sibling. Indeed the Minister considers that in many cases the liability to capital acquisitions tax may be entirely eliminated.

In addition to supplementing elderly sibling relief in the 1998 budget, the Minister also introduced a similar relief in respect of inheritances by other close relatives. For example, this relief is designed to cover inheritances by grandchildren, nieces or nephews who have been resident with the disponer. To qualify for the relief the recipient must come under the definition which is used for the purposes of the class II threshold for capital acquisitions tax. Among the conditions that apply for the granting of this relief are that the disponer and the recipient must have been living together in the house for ten continuous years prior to the inheritance and the recipient cannot be the beneficial owner or part-owner of another house.

The reason for extending the continuous residence requirement from five years in the case of elderly sibling relief to ten years, is because this relief does not contain an age criterion. As with elderly sibling relief, those who qualify for this relief will, for the purposes of computing the inheritance tax liability, have the value of the inherited house reduced by £150,000 or 80%, whichever is the lesser.

As Senators will observe the Government, through legislative initiatives, has already demonstrated considerable understanding of the taxation problems confronted by particular categories of people when they inherit the house in which they have been living for many years. Furthermore, the Revenue Commissioners will consider proposals for the postponement of the payment of the inheritance tax where payment would cause excessive hardship.

Nevertheless, it must be said that overall capital acquisitions tax remains a very important source of revenue for the State. It is a revenue stream that helps to finance the provision of necessary services and benefits by the State, including services for people who may be living in circumstances that are relatively less affluent. The Minister considers it important that a certain balance be maintained within the overall taxation system in terms of the yield from taxes on earnings, taxes on goods and services and taxes on capital. However, as I indicated at the outset and as Senators will be aware from the debate on the Finance Act, the Minister is mindful of the need for a degree of modernisation and alteration of the capital acquisitions tax code. He has asked me to give assurances to the House that he will be endeavouring to find an acceptable yet equitable resolution to the issue. The House, like the rest of us, will have to wait until budget day to see what the Minister delivers.

The Seanad adjourned at 4.05 p.m. until 12.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 23 November 1999.

bulletSpeech Menu
bulletTop