4.0 Economic Value of Pike
Angling
4.1 NUMBERS OF VISITING
ANGLERS
According to the latest available issue of Bord Failte's
'Angling Profile Bulletin' compiled and issued by their Market
Planning Section - dated 12 June 2001, 170,000 out-of-state anglers
visited Ireland during calendar year 1996 to participate in angling
holidays. Of this figure, 94,000 were categorised as specialist
overseas tourist anglers. The May 1998 issue of the 'Angling
Profile Bulletin' sets out Bord Failte's figures for 1994 (the first
year for which a detailed breakdown for all the angler categories is
available) and records specialist pike angler numbers reaching
31,000 for that year. However, equally eye-catching figures are
those set out for visiting game anglers, with a breakdown in numbers
detailing brown trout anglers at 8,000, sea trout anglers came in at
7,000 and salmon anglers at 13,000 for the 1994 angling season.
The combined total for all three categories of visiting game
angler amounted to 28,000 against 31,000 specialist pike anglers and
a combined total of 61,000 for both specialist pike and specialist
coarse anglers.
Bord Failte's profile of visiting angler by type for the years
1996 to 1999 indicate visiting game angler numbers remained static
during this four year period. The bulletin sets out the following
information.
Year: |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
Total no. specialist game anglers: |
30,000 |
28,000 |
27,000 |
29,000 |
By contrast, the same period recorded a very significant
decline in the number of specialist pike and coarse anglers visiting
Ireland.
Year: |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
Total no. specialist Pike & Coarse
anglers: |
57,000 |
51,000 |
44,000 |
40,000 |
This breakdown in visiting specialist angler numbers by type
for the period 1996 - "99 again was compiled and published by Bord
Failte's 'Market Planning Section'. The figures clearly support the
notion that those state bodies engaged in the promotion and
marketing of Ireland's angling resources have failed dismally
despite the largest single investment in our inland fisheries
amounting to Euro24m (IR£19m) under the Operational Programme for
Tourism - Tourism Angling Measure 1994 -"99. The collapse is all the
more difficult to comprehend at a time of unprecedented wealth
generation across most European economies during this period. By
1999, the total number of specialist /dedicated anglers visiting our
shores had plummeted to 92,000, with further slippage recorded in
2000 with only 89,000 anglers coming here according to Bord
Failte.
4.1
4.2 TOURIST PIKE ANGLER
SPEND
The first hand sales value of angling tourism to the Irish
Economy for the 1996 season has been calculated at Euro 84.7m
(IR£66.71m) (excluding access transport) based on an average spend
for all categories of specialist angler in the amount of Euro901.50
(IR£710.00) per angler (ref T.D.I.Report,Oct
"96).
Additionally, Bord Failte has identified from a total
of 170,000 visitors who participated in angling in 1996, that 94,000
were classified as specialist anglers. From this number representing
all categories of specialist angler, 22,000 were visiting for the
sole purpose of participating in specialist pike angling holidays.
The first hand value to the Irish Economy for this category of
angler amounts to Euro29.15m (IR£22.95m), based on the average spend
(excluding access transport) of Euro1325.00 (IR£1043.50) per
overseas pike angler (ref.T.D.I. Report, Oct. "96).
4.2
4.3 DOMESTIC PIKE ANGLER SPEND
In 1995/6 the Marine Institute commissioned a report entitled
"National Survey of Water-based Leisure Activities". This research
was carried out by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)
and some of the reports key findings are set out below:
1. Over 190,000 Irish people were involved in angling at the time
of this survey 2. Expenditure by all domestic anglers amounted to
Euro34.30m (IR£27.01m) in 1995/96 3. Expenditure by domestic
coarse/pike anglers was calculated at Euro9.57m (IR£7.54m) 4.
Expenditure by domestic game anglers was calculated at Euro13.13m
(IR£10.34m) 5. Expenditure by domestic shore sea anglers amounted
to Euro7.34m (IR£5.78m) 6. Expenditure by domestic boat sea
anglers was Euro4.25m (IR£3.35m)
4.3
4.4 VALUE OF LOST PIKE
ANGLING REVENUE TO THE ECONOMY
Section 4.4.2 & 4.4.3 are an IPS
submission
As no definitive figures have been made available covering the
2001 and 2002 angling tourism seasons, one can postulate with a
degree of accuracy the magnitude of the drop in angling tourism
numbers as a consequence of the "Foot & Mouth" outbreak,
followed by the unprecedented events of September 11, 2001. These
two events coming as they did at a time when both the US and
European economies were and continue to slide toward an economic
slump, have led to our present position which can best be described
as a collapse in the number of visiting anglers. Given the
significant percentage falls recorded across other sectors of
Ireland's tourism industry, angling tourism analysts and industry
commentators are obliged to take a conservative position when
calculating the number of specialist anglers visiting Ireland during
the 2002 season. If we accept a notional figure of 10,000 as being a
realistic one for the 2002 season, we can calculate the loss of
gross revenue to the Irish economy as follows:
In 1994, specialist pike angler tourist figures peaked at 31,000
anglers. We know from the "1996 TDI Report" that the per capita
spend by overseas pike anglers was calculated at Euro1,325.00
(excluding access costs). Therefore the peak loss of 21,000 on the
historic high of 31,000 specialist pike anglers for the intervening
8 years to Y/E 2002, represents a peak loss of Euro27.83m for 2002,
with an additional loss (reducing in size) experienced in each of
the previous years, commensurate with the differential recorded each
year.
Please note, as detailed figures for Y/E 2000, 2001 and 2002 are
not available at the time of writing, conservative estimates have
been used for the purposes of this exercise - denoted by
"e".
Year |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Actual |
31,000 |
26,000 |
22,000 |
15,000 |
14,000 |
12,000 |
11,000e |
10,000e |
10,000e |
Revenue |
E41.07m |
E34.45m |
E29.15m |
E19.87m |
E18.55m |
E15.90m |
E14.57m |
E13.25m |
E13.25m |
Lost
revenue |
|
(E6.62m) |
(E11.92m) |
(E21.20m)
|
(E22.52m)
|
(E25.17m)
|
(E26.50m) |
(E27.82m) |
(E27.82m) |
Therefore total revenue loss can be
calculated as amounting to Euro169.57m
Although this figure represents a very significant loss of income
to the Irish economy as a whole, it is in small vulnerable rural
communities, dependant on 'ripple effect' wealth creation that
emanates from a vibrant pike angling tourism industry where the
losses are felt most. A successful angling tourism sector in rural
Ireland is one of the classic examples of the multiplier effect
working at its best.
How can this be so given the levels of unprecedented growth
experienced by many European economies for close on five years?
Ireland was well positioned to take full advantage of this
pan-European boom of unequalled prosperity. Throughout this boom,
conservative estimates by tourism industry commentators forecast
rates of 5% - 7% year-on-year growth in the number of visiting
anglers coming to Ireland. Patently this has not occurred.
We must ask the question - why has Ireland failed so
spectacularly to maintain tourist angler numbers at an historic
level of 150,000 - 160,000 visitors per annum, let alone record
modest growth in numbers since 1996 to the present as was forecast?
The reasons for the abysmal failure are many and varied. The
primary and all-important reason for the 'across the board' collapse
is the perception held by many overseas anglers that Ireland's once
unassailable reputation as a sport fishing mecca has all but
disappeared due to the ravages of pollution, over-fishing and
destruction of fish habitat. Whether or not this perception bears
any relationship to reality makes no difference as it is the story
and/or image that has been conveyed from our riverbanks and
lakeshores to our target market - our fellow anglers, overseas.
4.4.1
Much of the
responsibility for this appalling situation rests fairly and
squarely with the actions or indeed inaction of both the Central and
Regional Fishery Boards during the period 1995 to the present.
Countless years of bankrupt and flawed fishery management
policies have left an indelible mark on the minds of visiting
anglers that Ireland's fishing was being systematically destroyed by
the very same organisations that are charged with the conservation,
protection and development of Ireland's inland fisheries. The
overtly duplicitous actions by certain fishery boards down the years
have led to a deep cynicism and resentment developing in not only
the domestic pike / coarse angler but more importantly, in the
repeat visiting angler.
All sport fishing and especially overseas sport fishing thrives
on positive press and feel-good images as evidenced by the numerous
articles and accounts of successful and bountiful fishing trips that
appear in the angling press. But equally, the angling tourism
industry is very sensitive to the cold winds of negative criticism
that emanate from dissatisfied angling/outdoor writers. One example
is that of well known pike angler and author Neville Fickling who
wrote in the Pike & Predator magazine in December 1999 "Mask
is the only water I have ever fished where it was possible on any
given day to say there is probably a 40lb plus pike somewhere down
there. That 40 is probably in a hole in the ground courtesy of the
WRFB."
This constant stream of negative commentary, culminating in
leader articles accompanied by graphic images of butchered specimen
pike and brown trout appearing in most of the important European
angling magazines, has certainly made an impact. Such emotive and
provocative articles showing images of drowning and indeed drowned
ducks, otters, swans and other wildlife is the death knell for any
angling tourism industry - regardless of whether this negative press
is focused on a regional or national issue. Bad press is bad press
and harsh negative commentary inflicts serious damage to a media
dependent, tourist sport fishing industry.
Reports of incidents of a serious nature involving fishery board
field staff or senior fishery management will almost always result
in negative reportage with the attendant collateral damage to
vulnerable angling tourism enterprises struggling to survive in a
competitive, international sport fishing market. A total disregard
for the needs of domestic pike anglers and a lack of understanding
of the standard of sport expected and demanded by the discerning
international tourist angler market by many fisheries personnel,
only serves to highlight the gulf that now exists between Ireland
and competing angling tourism destinations.
This lack of
understanding of the needs and expectations of today's sophisticated
tourist pike angling sector as revealed by many senior figures
within the Central and Regional Board also includes their paucity of
knowledge of the pike-angling product. This disclosure of ignorance
compounded by a closed mindset is singularly responsible for turning
away tens of thousands of anglers from either coming here as first
time visitors or as repeat regulars to Ireland. Repeat visitors are
the life-blood of any tourism sector.
In fact, many European
angling writers have consciously refrained from writing about or
promoting Irish pike angling due to the duplicitous policies of the
CFB and some Regional Boards - including the unacceptable use of
gill nets as a fishery management tool in these times of
biodiversity awareness and environmental enlightenment. A complete
change in pike management practices by the Regional Boards must take
effect if the downward spiral in visitor angler numbers is to be
halted and ultimately turned around.
In addition, overseas pike anglers have witnessed the slaughter
of our pike stocks by unscrupulous fishmonger types purporting to be
engaged in genuine angling. Countless attempts by visiting and local
anglers to have offending piking pirates apprehended by
disinterested fisheries officers, have instilled a deep-rooted
cynicism in these once regular visitors to our lakes and rivers.
Ireland can ill-afford to treat her valuable customers so
shabbily.
4.4.2
The much-publicised
decline in the once prolific and internationally renowned Shannon
pike fishery further supports the contention held by informed
angling writers that senior management and indeed the members of the
Shannon Board have no real interest in pike or coarse fish for that
matter. The Shannon catchment accounts for over 20% of Ireland's
entire freshwater resources and was regarded as Ireland's most
important river catchment in terms of angling tourism economic
activity. This situation has changed utterly over the past five
years with a fall in the number of British coarse anglers visiting
the mid /upper Shannon region of almost 80% on the recorded high of
the 1996 figures provided by angling tourism operators.
The revelatory remarks made by Eamonn Cusack, Chief Executive
Officer of the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board at a meeting between
pike angling interests and senior staff of the ShRFB on 13 November
2000 give little cause for optimism to angling operators struggling
to survive in what has become an increasingly competitive
international market place. The remarks afford a unique and
undoubtedly accurate insight, held widely among anglers, that the
Board Members and Management of the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board
have little or no interest in any species other than members of the
salmonid family. The remarks by the Shannon Board's CEO were made
in response to concerns raised about the very obvious lack of
interest at Board level for the well-being of the Shannon's pike and
coarse fish stocks. The Shannon Board's Chief Executive Officer
responded with the following remarks: "my twenty-two man board have
no real interest in pike, or coarse fish for that matter and that's
your problem."
According to the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board's official
website, the following are their stated objectives:
The Board aims to: o conserve and protect fish stocks, water
quality and the fishery environment. o develop and enhance fish
stocks o develop and support the angling product o assist
through angling development, the creation of jobs and bring economic
benefit to local communities.
There are many coarse and pike anglers - both domestic and
overseas, who would dispute the degree of sincerity and truthfulness
of the Shannon Board in their feigning any real interest in pike and
coarse angling tourism development within their region. More
importantly, there are a great many angling writers and magazine
editors who know the above objectives to be a sham and liable to
mislead their readership and thus will not promote the angling
potential of the Shannon region. These writers, as do other
concerned anglers, feel coarse and pike anglers have been treated
contemptuously by the ShRFB over the years. The old adage "THE
CUSTOMER IS KING" has obviously not been adopted as a basic tenet
for successful business practice by the management and staff of the
Shannon Board.
In any other area of business, senior management and board
members would have been called to account by the shareholders and
resignations demanded and received. As if to underline just how
out of touch the board and management of the ShRFB really are with
the price sensitivities and overall competitiveness of the sport
fishing market, they go and score the biggest "own goal" in Irish
sport fishing history. The imposition of a compulsory annual
Euro30.00 angling fee covering pike and coarse angling on certain
designated coarse fisheries will sound the death knell for affected
angling tourism operators. Most, if not all of the levied waters
that come under this new Euro30.00 fee are located within the BMW
Region - an area designated by the EU as being severely
disadvantaged in economic development and infrastructural investment
compared to the rest of Ireland and indeed Europe. This seems to be
an extraordinarily unjust and unwise decision. This is a fishing
licence in everything but name and could hardly come at a more
inopportune time as Ireland's angling tourism businesses reel as a
result of the collapse in visitor anglers.
The scale of mismanagement by the ShRFB as evidenced by a
catalogue of controversial incidents, together with their collective
paucity in understanding the needs of/and standards demanded by
today's pike angler, is a cause for grave concern among the pike
angling fraternity and angling operators alike. Given the
economic forecasts for all tourism sectors here in Ireland and with
the inexorable slide by many European economies toward recession,
the Board's policies are simply astounding.
4.4.3
4.5 THE FUTURE - WHERE TO
FROM HERE?
In order to find a solution, first we must confront the causative
problems. There has to be a collective recognition and acceptance
that pike are a highly valuable national asset. Historically,
Ireland's position as the best location for producing more pike over
35 pounds than any other country remained unassailable for more than
three hundred years.
In Fred Buller's remarkable and
authoritative tome - "The Domesday Book of Mammoth Pike" (published
1979), the author investigated and documented the accounts of the
captures of 230 mammoth pike - each weighing 35 pounds or more. Of
the 230 fish recorded on the 'Big Pike List' of this unique piece of
angling research, 149 had their provenance in Ireland! That Ireland
was indeed a regular producer of truly enormous pike there is little
doubt.
Northern pike are a predatory sport fish par excellence and enjoy
a huge following worldwide. In a survey carried out in 1996 by a
leading US sports research institute based in Alexandria, Va.,
northern pike were accorded the mantle - "the world's most sought
after sport fish" - a true circumpolar species.
From
information provided to this writer during visits to senior
personnel in the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic
Development (RWED) in the Canadian Northwest Territories, it would
appear we in Ireland can learn much from the strict fish
conservation codes of practice in force there. (ref. per. comm.
Kevin MacLellan, Manager RWED, Yellowknife; Gerd Fricke, Manager
Tourism & Parks, Deh Cho Region, Fort Simpson; Lindsay Kulak,
Manager Tourism & Parks, GNWT, Yellowknife).
The Northwest Territories of Canada comprises an area extending
to 1.7 million square miles and has a population of 41,000 people.
Yellowknife the capital, is home to 18,000 people. With most of the
territories devoid of man's presence, NWT is a pristine, unexplored
wilderness, offering some of the finest trophy pike and lake trout
fishing in the world. It is not uncommon to land 70 - 100 fish per
rod in 10-12 hours of fishing, with 10% of the catch surpassing
trophy status (weight > 20lbs+) for both pike and trout. Yet,
despite an embarrassment of riches with the five star quality of
their fishing, the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT)
through RWED have imposed strict laws governing fish conservation
and the use of barbless hooks. They also promote a strong "catch
& release" ethic among local and visiting anglers alike.
GNWT Fish and Wildlife Officers have impressed upon me the
critical need for strict fish conservation laws to deter remote
fishing camp operators from depleting the highly-valued large trophy
fish resource from these cold, sub-arctic lakes and rivers. In
essence the reason the Territories are enjoying a huge surge in
angling tourism numbers is due to the prolific trophy fishing. If
this quality fishing disappeared, so too would the visiting
anglers.
Florida sees an annual influx of over 11million out-of-state
sport fishermen. The most sought after species is the largemouth
bass and this species alone is responsible for attracting millions
of devotees from all points in North America to Florida's myriad of
lakes, canals and ponds. The numbers of recorded trophy largemouths
(fish > 10lbs) has been rising steadily over the past twenty
years and this despite a very large increase over the same period in
the numbers of anglers pursuing their favourite species of bass.
Officers with Florida's Department of Fish and Game are unanimous in
their agreement that the increase in the numbers of trophy
largemouths is directly linked to the practice of 'catch &
release' sport fishing alongwith strict fishery law enforcement
throughout the 'Sunshine State'. The same success applies to their
world famous tarpon fishing, available along Florida's Gulf Coast as
well as the more familiar tarpon resorts located along the Keys.
All those I consulted with agree that the statewide epidemic of
'catch & release' has been the single most important factor
influencing the quality of tarpon fishing throughout the State of
Florida.
4.5.1
All States in the US
including Alaska, Wisconsin and Minnesota and all Canadian provinces
including Ontario, Saskatchewan and Manitoba employ and enforce
strict fish conservation laws and bag limits to protect their highly
valuable and greatly valued sport fisheries. Sport fishing is the
most popular participation sport in the world and in North America
represents an enormous industry.
In a 1997 study carried out
by Dr. Vishwanie Maharaj of the American Sportfishing Association,
Virginia - 51 million US anglers spent US$108billion pursuing their
favourite pastime during that year. This amount represents the total
economic impact of recreational fishing on the American economy.
Furthermore, the US sportfishing industry supported 1.3 million jobs
during 1997 - a very significant contribution to the US economy!
Clearly the future success or failure of Irish angling tourism is
dependent on a major shift in mind and attitude towards pike. Either
we continue to regard pike as vermin to be purged or we accept and
respect it for what it is - the world's most sought after sport
fish.
AFB Jan. 2003.
4.5.2
Return
to Submission Front Page
Return
to Homepage
|