Victory Points |
Armour | Start | Start | End | End | ||
Front | Side | Rear | Month | Year | Month | Year | |
5 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 43 | 5 | 45 |
SU-85 Assault Gun | ||||||||||||||||||||
RANGE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
HARD | 24 | 22 | 20 | 17 | 14 | 10 | 6 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
SOFT | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Specification |
Whereas the SU-122 had been designed as a multi-purpose assault gun the SU-85 was intended to be a dedicated tank destroyer.Design work commenced in August 1943 and was considerably assisted by the experience gained during the development of the SU-122.The armored superstructure of the SU-85 was virtually identical to that of the SU-122.However the SU-85's 85 mm (3.35 in) gun based on an anti aircraft gun was mounted in an armored ball mantlet also employed by late production SU-122s. By August 1944 the first 100 SU-85s were ready to enter service with the Red Army's newly-formed tank destroyer battalions.Like the German Panzerjager the SU-85 was handicapped by the limited traverse of its main armament.If a target moved outside it's field of fire the SU-85 often had to manoeuvre to engage it.Once involved in a mobile battle a tank with a fully traversable turret had the advantage.More difficult to explain the SU-85 lacked a machine gun making it vulnerable to enemy infantry with anti-tank weapons , a danger countered by SU-85s standing well back from their targets and engaging them at long ranges.The introduction of the T-34/85 medium tank with the same armament made the SU-85 obsolete.By early 1945 they had been withdrawn by the Red Army and replaced by the SU-100.Surviving SU-85s were handed ot to the armies of the Soviet satellite states in eastern Europe. |