Issues
relating to making first-cut grass silage
Padraig
O'Kiely
Teagasc,
Grange Research Centre
[Article
for Irish Farmers Journal, April 2003]
This
article will cover the following topics:
·
Silage quality matters - a reminder after last season
·
Balancing grass digestibility with yield
·
Ten tips for making quality first-cut silage
Silage
quality matters - a reminder after last season
The
wet and cold weather last May and June meant that when many farmers eventually
managed to salvage their meadows for silage, they produced quantities of
feedstuffs that supported very disappointing animal performance. On some farms
silage quality barely supported the maintenance of livestock during the
winter. Clearly, the delayed harvest together with the associated wet crops,
soft ground conditions, etc., combined to lower a number of aspects of silage
quality.
Silage
quality, or feed value, determines the amount of forage cattle will eat when
they are given ad libitum access to
it, the efficiency with which they will convert it into meat and/or milk, the
quantity and often the quality of the meat/milk produced, and sometimes the
general health of the animals. The two vital components of silage quality are:
(1)
Feed value of the crop at harvest. This depends on:
-
crop maturity at harvest - e.g. stemmier, more mature crops have
a lower feed value
-
sward type - e.g. many old pasture swards dominated by poor
grasses have lower feed value than swards of perennial ryegrass
-
sward conditions - e.g. lodged, wet crops can rapidly lose
quality and therefore have a disappointing feed value at harvest. Similarly,
swards that were not grazed sufficiently short in late autumn or in spring can
have a stemmy, decaying butt that can reduce feed value at harvest.
(2)
Efficiency with which the crop is ensiled, preserved and fed.
This depends on:
-
only attempting to wilt the crop if it can genuinely dry rapidly
-
ensiling it free of contamination from soil, animal manure, etc.
-
even and adequate application of appropriate additive, if
required
-
fast filling followed by immediate perfect sealing, to ensure
the ensiled forage is stored in an air-free environment. Protection of this
seal throughout storage.
-
management at feedout that minimises the duration of exposure of
silage to air
The
feed value of the crop at harvest reflects its concentration of available
energy, protein, minerals and vitamins, as well as how much an animal will
voluntarily eat. The dry matter digestibility (DMD) is the most frequently
used objective index of this feed value. Thus, well preserved silage with
digestibilities of 60 (very stemmy), 65, 70 and 75 (very leafy)% DMD can
support liveweight gains of 0.31, 0.49, 0.66 and 0.83 kg/day, respectively,
when offered ad libitum and
unsupplemented to finishing steers. Clearly, it is not appropriate to produce
top digestibility silage for all animals. For example, for a spring-calving
suckler beef cow herd where the progeny are being brought through to slaughter
at 18 (heifers) to 23 (steers) months of age, and where the farm is in REPS,
it can work well to take an early first-cut (22 May) from some fields to
produce 75%DMD silage for the progeny, and on the remaining silage fields
harvest the first-cut in the second week of June to produce lower cost but
nutritionally appropriate silage for dry beef cows (i.e.65-67%DMD).
The
efficiency of ensiling reflects how much of the feed value of the harvested
crop is still present in the silage. It is reflected in the general standard
of preservation (measured by silage pH, ammonia-N concentration, lactic acid
content, etc.) and the extent of rotted or mouldy material present. Clearly,
whereas farmers require different silage digestibilities for cattle with
different performance targets, top quality is always required for every silage
in terms of good preservation and the absence of mould. Thus, quality matters
for all silages.
Balancing
grass digestibility with yield
Throughout
the majority of
(a)
the level and type of animal production required
(b)
the duration for which silage will be offered and its proportion
in the diet
(c)
intake and conversion efficiency characteristics required of the
forage
(d)
the value of the animal produce
(e)
the cost and supply of silage
(f)
the cost, quality and availability of alternatives
(g)
the costs of land, buildings and labour.
The
optimal digestibility for silage therefore varies with changing economic
circumstances and the optimal balance between grass digestibility and yield
differs with the requirements of each farm.
Knowledge
of the patterns of change in grass yield and digestibility are clearly
important for identifying the best balance for individual farms. Table 1
summarises a Grange experiment that studied the average pattern of change of
three different permanent grassland swards during a period of 6 years. Each
crop was closed after a tight grazing the previous November, received 115 kg
N/ha in March and had replicated plots harvested from the primary growth at
weekly intervals between early May and early July.
Table
1. Grass yield and digestibility
Harvest
date |
1
May |
8
May |
15
May |
22
May |
29
May |
5
June |
12
June |
19
June |
26
June |
3
July |
Yield
(t
DM/ha) |
2.92 |
3.99 |
4.98 |
5.96 |
6.79 |
7.82 |
8.48 |
8.93 |
9.50 |
9.83 |
DMD% |
79.9 |
77.9 |
77.5 |
76.6 |
74.6 |
69.2 |
67.9 |
64.3 |
63.5 |
58.2 |
Source:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre
Within
these average values, considerable differences occurred between years in grass
DM yield on a particular date, and to a lesser extent yearly differences also
occurred in digestibility. In general, lighter yields on the swards at the
start of May were reflected in lighter yields in late May/early June.
Averaged
over the six years, grass growth rates were excellent, although they slowed
progressively as the season advanced. During the first 35 days, the average
growth rate was 140 kg DM/ha/day, while during the final 28 days the average
was 72 kg DM/ha/day. Grass digestibilities were very good during much of May,
and fell more rapidly during June than May. Thus, grass DMD fell by 0.31
percentage units per day during the first 35 days and by 0.39 percentage units
per day during the final 28 day duration. These values indicate that for the
sward types, location and management systems prevailing, excellent
digestibility with a reasonable yield would have been achieved by harvesting
at the start of the final week in May. Such silage might suit lactating dairy
cows or finishing beef cattle. In contrast, excellent yields of moderate
digestibility would have been achieved at the end of the first week in June,
and the resultant silage would have suited dry beef suckler cows.
Ten
tips for making quality first-cut silage
1.
Put pen to paper and write out a complete plan of how you will
successfully make appropriate quality silage for your farm. Some points in the
plan will have long-term effects for several years, while others will relate
specifically to the upcoming harvest. Flexibility will be vital for the plan
to succeed, because of the need to adapt to our variable weather. In years
like 2002, this may be easier said than done.
It
will be important to base decisions on quantified information whenever
possible. The decisions also need
to be allied to the timely and correct execution of each component of silage
making, storing and feeding.
2.
Preparing silage fields:
-
graze silage swards short in late autumn, or graze them in early
spring, to avoid the accumulation of an aged low quality butt on the crop
-
roll the fields when the grass is still quite short but when
growth rates are taking off. Soil conditions need to be firm but pliable –
they should be firm enough to avoid wheel damage to the field and soft enough
to allow levelling by the roller and have any moderate sized stones pushed
down. Don’t roll the grass after it starts to elongate as this can crush the
stems and impair growth.
-
consider controlling weeds such as docks in early May, or
prepare to spray them in the regrowth following the first-cut
-
remove any larger stones, pieces of timber and other such
obstacles from the silage fields.
-
tidy-up gateways and trim hedges adjacent to them
3.
Apply total nitrogen (N) at from 115 to 140 (reseed) kg/ha from
the combined input of inorganic fertiliser (e.g. CAN, urea, etc.) and slurry.
-
apply fertiliser and/or slurry evenly and as early as feasible
-
allow approximately 10 kg N per 4500 litres (1000 gallons)
undiluted cattle slurry applied in Feb./March
-
slurry should only be spread on bare stubble or very short grass
-
there is little real advantage to the silage sward from
splitting the application of N fertiliser.
4.
Prepare silage and effluent storage facilities:
-
clean out the silos, effluent channels and storage tanks etc.
and prepare them in plenty of time for the upcoming harvest. Carry out any
repairs in sufficient time to allow adequate curing of concrete, etc.
-
stack tyres beside the silo to facilitate quickly placing them
on the polythene cover once the silo is filled
-
purchase polythene sheets that conform to the standard IS 246
1989
-
carefully agitate slurry in tanks so it can be spread onto the
bare stubble quickly after harvest. Take the necessary precautions to avoid
exposure to slurry gases. Ensure slurry tanker is in working order for
spreading slurry immediately after the first-cut is harvested.
-
prepare warning notices to go outside gateways onto public
roadways. Ensure children and strangers will not come too close to the
silage-making operation.
5.
Monitor the development of swards. Check out the services and
costs of available contractors, and book the contractor of choice in time. Aim
to harvest when the balance between grass yield and stage of maturity are
optimal for your system(s).
6.
It is difficult in our climate for wilting to be anything other
than opportunistic or fortuitous on intensively managed grassland farms with
large operation contractors being used. However, if wilting is a target for a
farmer, this clearly requires good drying conditions and
exposure of a significant amount of the crop to sunshine. Under such
conditions:
-
monitor the weather forecast carefully
-
mow after the dew has dried off the crop, as dew will dry faster
from a standing compared to a mown crop
-
aim that the mown crop would not spend more than one night on
the ground
-
spreading grass to give it full ground cover (i.e. tedding)
immediately after mowing results in the fastest rate of wilting, whereas
mowing and combining two wide swaths results in the slowest wilting rate.
Thus, there can be a significant benefit from the simple technique of opening
the gates wide behind the mower conditioner and leaving a wide rather than a
narrow swath. Remember that wilting grass is dried mainly by sunshine, so the
greater the extent to which mown grass is spread out in thin layers the faster
the rate of wilting (weather permitting).
-
with light crops in good drying conditions, don’t overwilt.
7.
If an additive is being used, it is important to:
-
estimate grass ensilability : take samples of grass that are
genuinely representative of the crop to be harvested. Measure grass sugar
concentration (expressed as a proportion of grass juice) and preferably also
buffering capacity. Sugars can be measured on farms using a refractometer,
while both sugars and buffering capacity can be measured on samples submitted
to laboratories.
-
monitor predicted weather conditions
-
estimate the fresh yield being harvested - this necessitates
weighing a strip or trailer-load of grass at harvest time
-
decide which additive and what application rate is required.
-
ensure the target application rate is achieved, and that the
additive is applied evenly
Remember,
that many crops do not require treatment with additives. Consult your Teagasc
advisor if in doubt.
8.
Silo filling and sealing:
-
fill the silo quickly and seal properly beneath 2 sheets of
black 0.125mm polythene
-
cover completely with a layer of car tyres, placed edge-to-edge
-
seal the edges with a layer of sandbags, silt, etc.
-
fence the silo from livestock, etc.
-
as the silage sinks somewhat in the silo during the following
week or two, check the plastic seal to ensure no ingress of air will occur
-
ensure the effluent collection system is working properly, and
spread effluent on bare silage stubble
-
if you observe any gas visibly emanating from the silage, stay
upwind of it and keep all humans and livestock away from it until it disperses
-
inspect the polythene cover periodically, and patch any damage
that has occurred
9.
Measure the amount of silage in the silo, as this should
influence subsequent grassland management during the season. A month or more
after ensiling, representatively core sample the silage and obtain an analysis
from a reputable laboratory. The analysis should tell you the DM and protein
content of the silage, its standard of preservation and its digestibility.
This information is important in planning the feeding regime for next winter.
It will also help to evaluate the success of the recent silage campaign and
indicate the strengths and weaknesses of the system you adopted. Your Teagasc
advisor can play an important role in this exercise.
10.
Long-term:
-
decide where grass silage fits into your farming system, what
fields are best suited to silage-making, and how you need to manage them each
year. How much silage will you realistically need, and how much land is
required to provide this.
-
ensure land used for silage-making is well drained and is not
compacted. Throughout silage-making, slurry and fertiliser spreading, etc.,
try to avoid causing soil compaction.
-
use perennial ryegrass swards, preferably of intermediate- to
late-season cultivars. If reseeding, invest the effort in seedbed preparation,
seed-mix selection, sowing, etc. that a 10-year (minimum) investment warrants.
-
ensure adequate soil P and K status, and pH, to permit optimal
grass growth. This should be based on regular soil analysis and full
cognisance of animal manures spread and inorganic fertiliser applied. Although
additional sulphur may be required in some situations, benefit from such
application is most likely for second cut silage from sandy soils.