Analysis:
1 ... For 'ancient definition' read: archaic relativization, from the
Veda right up to
Shankara and still held to be true (i.e. certain) by most devout
Hindus
1.1 ... Like his archaic predecessors, Shankara did not attempt to
explain (i.e. verify or prove) precisely (i.e. in discrete detail) how
sat
(and sattva, i.e. beingness) happens. In other words, he
offered no clear technical analysis of the phenomenon. He accepted
sat as a given, i.e. as 'proven' by scriptural revelation
1
1.1.1 ... According to Shankara, agama and sruti, i.e. ancient verbal
and scriptural transmission were sufficient proof of validity (or
truth; Sanskrit: satya). That was a serious blunder.
1,2 But then, Shankara's goal was not the
upgrading of (secondary, i.e. chit) understanding in contemporary terms
but
the reestablishment of Vedic (and Upanishadic) rule, and of course, the
rule
of the Brahmin caste.
3
His reaction (i.e. as throw-back) against what he believed was the
decay
(into populist religiosity (i.e. of the Puranas) of pre-historic Indian
spiritual purity, though a superb intellectual achievement, heralded
the
cultural downfall of India
1.1.1.1 ... i.e. because he excluded the 'proof' of experimentation and
of actual human experience (i.e. revelation or realization)
1.1.1.2 ... A further serious error was that he never bothered to
define (or explain in discretest detail) his basic terms of reference,
i.e.
his premises. His premises were elastic (i.e. vague, ambiguous). That
made
them very useful as means of deconstruction his opponents views
(i.e.
darshanas) but useless for establishing absolutely certain (i.e. logic)
positions
1.1.1.3 ... Likewise the much adored
Ramana Maharshi of Arunachal.
1
This exceptionally skilled bhakti (masquerading as a jnana) yogi was
much revered by the Indian establishment (i.e. because he reconfirmed
the
past and so served to legitimize the established order) and by hordes
of
functionally illiterate Western spiritual tourists because he did not
rock the boat but sought to confirm ancient Indian scriptural
tradition. Sadly, an avatar he was not since he lacked the fiery
originality which is the hallmark of those who emerge directly from the
womb of the Great
Goddess
1.1.1.3.1 ... Likewise the highly intelligent and knowledgeable
Sri Aurobindo who sought to ingratiate himself with the neo-hindu
establishment rather than do what an avatar does, namely sink the past
and open the gate to a new future. His extremely complex 'Life Divine'
and 'Integral
Yoga' notions turned out to be de'light'ful fictions
2 ... For 'being' read: continuing
1
realness
2,3
2.1 ... For 'continuing' read: (the observer self-affect of) a series
(or sequence)
2.2 ... For 'realness' read: the collision affect (or moment)
of two (virtual) quanta
1,2
(i.e. as inertial states)
2.2.1 ... For 'quantum' read: Sanskrit:
tat (meaning: that or
such) or
tattva (i.e. that'ness)
2.2.2 ... (Random) Quantum collision happens @ the capacity of c
1 (because in a vacuum
2). That being so, the whole collision
moment that makes absolutely real
3
(i.e. as hardware affect) can be symbolized as
c
2, i.e. read as c squared, i.e. when c is
multiplied by itself. In other words, the c
2
(or real) moment happens when two virtual c's collide
2.2.2.1 ... For 'c' read: certain; or 'as a constant'
2.2.2.2 ... (True (i.e. certain)) Collision happens in a vacuum because
all relativity (i.e. common order) has been compressed out. Collision
happens @ the rate of absolute certainty, locally called @ maximum
speed (usually taken to mean the speed (or instruction rate) of light)
2.2.2.3 ... For 'absolutely real' read: (absolutely) certain, perfect,
true (Sanskrit: sat'ya), good, pure; same identical and so on
2.3 ... For 'continuing realness' read: is'ness
1
2.3.1 ... The 'I am' affect
1
(Sanskrit:
asmita) emerges (secondarily) as self-reference of a
first limitation (resulting from a cut or slice of the series, hence
quantization, therefore localization) of 'continuous realness' (i.e.
is'ness)
2
2.3.1.1 ... For 'affect' read: aspect; Sanskrit:
guna
2.3.1.2 ... A third affect, namely the 'other' (whom 'I make hard' (or
real) and 'who makes me hard' (or real) via contact) experience emerges
as collateral, i.e. together with the 'I ma' affect. It completes the
trio of affects that provide initial conscious (hence daytime, hence
relative) self-definition. All three (self-) affects, starting with the
'is'ness' affect, can be observed each morning (i.e. preferably at
about 4.00 am) just after awakening. They are, of course, most clearly
and cleanly experienced as undeniably real (and hence
self-referentially true) during a 'Great Awakening' experience.
Individuals adept, i.e. highly skilled at single intent focusing, for
instance Yogis and Buddhists skilled in absorption meditations, can
experience the three affects from moment to moment
3 ... For 'sattva' read: existence,
1
from Latin existere, meaning ex- 'out' + sistere 'take a stand'; to
wit, to stand out; the fact or state of living or having ongoing
objective
2
reality, i.e. limited is'ness
3.1 ... Early Sanskrit scholars (such as J.H. Woods) found it
impossible to translate the term 'sattva' into English simply because
the term was too elastic (i.e. vague, ambiguous). Consequently they
simply left the word '
sattva' in english texts, no doubt hoping
that readers would find a meaning that suited their need. Indians have,
to date, made no
serious attempt to provide an in depth and precise definition of the
word, probably because they don't really know what it means either.
Superficial translation renders '
sattva' as 'being' or
'existence'
1
3.1.1 ... Sattva is here defined
(with thanks to Einstein) as:
sat = ntatsc2
(defined
1,2,3)
3.1.1.1 ... For '
sat' read: ongoing
is'ness (or realness)
3.1.1.2 ... For '
ntats
' read: an indefinite number (or mass) of virtual
tat quanta
3.1.1.3 ... For '
c2
' read: colliding tat ><tat, therefore 1><1, therefore
c><c to produce a c squared moment, i.e. a real tat
(i.e. tat by tat) quantum
3.2 ... 'Objective' here means: self-referentially different. In other
words, since all perception (i.e. referential contact) happens inside a
system, an object happens as a self-differentiation resulting from
differential (i.e. alternate order, in fact a random bit of disorder)
data input
4 ... For 'current definition' read: relativization derived
from a system's actual, i.e. here and now state (i.e. as whole (active)
data base and systems programming)
1
4.1 ... In short, for 'current' read: active data processing procedure
1
4.1.1 ... The true avatar (i.e. of the Brahman as Basic Operating
System) emerges in and as the here and now, hence shows no respect for
the past (unless he's an avatar of the Lord Vishnu, the Great
Preserver, i.e. as one-down (and one-of-three) Brahman platform or
sub-function)
5 ... For 'series' read: row,
1,2,3
chain; from Latin
serere 'join, connect'
5.1 ... The minimum quantity
1
(of connections
2
or contacts or number) of a row is 3
3
5.1.1 ... The quantity (or number) of (connections of) a row, hence the
closure
(or ending) speed (or rate) of the row, self-represents locally as
time.
In other words, time happens as function of number (or quantity)
5.1.2 ... The relationship between the elements (i.e. as quanta) of a
row
(or series) is random. With (differential
1
) repetition,
2
the
relationship becomes relative, hence ordered
3
5.1.2.1 ... For 'differential' read: with at least one random element.
A
series (or row, repeated perfectly self-eliminates. In other words,
since
only random bits carry instruction, i.e. have the capacity to affect,
the
non-random (i.e. order, i.e. the function of repetition) is compressed
out
at contact
5.1.2.2 ... (Differential) repetition happens as observer (or affectee
taking
up an alternate, in fact random position or angle) function
5.1.2.3 ... Therefore order happens as function of (differential)
repetition
5.1.3 ... Contact (or connection) of 2 (random bits) produces the
realness
affect. The third contact adds relativity
5.2 ... A row (or series) repeated produces (i.e. affects as) a
sequence.
A repeating sequence affects as an (complex) order
5.3 ... The series (or row, repeated as sequence
1 affecting as order) provides continuity
5.3.1 ... For 'sequence' read: program (i.e. as in a computer program)
6 ... For 'quantum' read: a whole or unit, i.e. a steady
1 state
6.1 ... For 'steady' read: @ maximum entropy,
1,2 therefore wholly self consistent,
hence @ self-interaction rest,
3
i.e. devoid (Sanskrit:
sunjata) of ongoing internal
self-ordering
4
6.1.1 ... For '@ maximum entropy' read: 100% defragmented
1; or, @ maximum internal self-ordering
compression, i.e. a system whose internal order(-ing) has ceased, i.e.
an inertial state
6.1.1.1 ... For '100%' defragmented read: capacity spread (or dispersal
into order, hence capacity loss) eliminated (or suppressed or
restricted).
A defragmented (i.e. internal ordering ceased) system operates @
relative
(however self-absolute) initial state capacity. In other words,
defragmentation of capacity, resulting from withdrawal of capacity
application, returns
a system to initial state capacity, hence to quantum, i.e. as whole
system's
function
1
6.1.1.1.1 ... In computer language, a yogi first defragments his
operations to go 'on line' to his goal (i.e. as singleness intent). He
then collapses
(i.e. compresses, i.e. shortens) 'on line' to a (final, i.e. any 1 of
n)
point in order to achieve the
readiness to act (i.e. connect) 'on-end', i.e. 1><1, to his
goal, thereby achieving
that capacity necessary for real contact, i.e. for achieving a moment
of
absolute realness, i.e.
tat.
1
In other words, he runs an RFS program, i.e. a 'Return to Factory (i.e.
to Origin or Initial State) settings program that shuts down all data
and
local applications processing operations
6.1.1.1.1.1 ... In other words, he eliminates
sat (or
sattva
) (as series of
tats 1
) to achieve the free (Sanskrit:
ananta) capacity of the
virtual initial
state
6.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... For 'series of
tats' read: cit, or citta or
chit
; also
jnanam (i.e. as secondary (to n) knowledge
6.1.1.2 ... For 'inertial state' read:
guru
6.1.2 ... For '@ maximum entropy' read: in nirvana, hence, having
achieved moksha, i.e. release (i.e. as blown out) from capacity
impedance (and which produces fluctuation)
6.1.3 ... For '@ self-interaction rest' read: inert
6.1.4 ... A data processing system, for instance a human, a grain of
sand or an atom, is 'steady'
1
when it achieves the maximum entropy state, hence has reduced or
otherwise eliminated (i.e. via YOGA) all internal ordering
1 to nil. Such a system, i.e. one in
sam'adhi ,
functions (relatively) as a bit of 'dead weight', i.e. as a 'weighty 1'
(i.e. as an inertial state), and self-referentially as 'perfect'
sameness
6.1.4.1 ... A 'steady state' (i.e. a guru) presents as an order
of 1, i.e. as a whole and complete, hence perfect (or done) system
(i.e. as a logic unit), therefore fundamentally as a random bit.
Only a random bit carries instruction.
Only a random bit can collide (i.e. strike) at the rate of c to produce
an absolute realness (i.e.
tat) moment, i.e. the c
2 affect
6.1.4.1.1 ...
For 'order' read: repetition
, i.e. of a sequence random quanta or bits
7 ... For 'collision; read: from Latin
collidere, meaning
'strike
together', meaning: the mutual 1><1 (i.e. 1 to 1, hence 1 by 1
producing a 1
2
(squared)
affect) instruction of two orders of 1 (i.e. of 2 random bits)
7.1 ... Only random bits can collide since (mutual,
or common) order (hence relativity) is compressed out prior to actual
collision. Collision happens only in a relativity (hence order
(therefore
repetition) eliminated) vacuum, hence @ c
8 ... For 'affect' read: Latin
affectere, meaning : 'to (or
towards) do' or to 'aim at', meaning to 'work on or influence'. Affect
happens
by means of strike (or collision, hence 1 : 1 (or > <, or random
bit > < random bit) instruction
9 ... For 'function' read: from Latin:
functio, from
fungi 'perform', meaning to carry out, accomplish or
fulfill a task or act
1
9.1 ... as a quantum collision or as a collision of a (simple)
line (or sequence of random bits or events, i.e. as an application
program)
or as a (complex) pattern (of collisions) of such lines
10 ... For 'provide' read: support, uphold. In other words,
sat represents a (i.e. any) relativity
1
(displaying as line (i.e. as sequence of random bits or events) or
pattern of such lines, hence as location
or address) as real and continuous, thereby making the (uncertain,
because
not @ maximum entropy
2
) the relativity (i.e. the location) undeniable, i.e. absolutely certain
10.1 ... For 'a relativity' serving as a reference mode (or frame)
read: Sanskrit: chit, i.e. cit or citta (often and wrongly translated
1 as consciousness
2)
3
10.1.1 ... The Sanskrit term '
chit' is extremely elastic.
Early translators either made no effort to translate the term into
English
or rendered it as 'mind stuff', whatever that means
10.1.2 ... For 'con'sciousness' read: coming together of (a sequence
of) primary 'knowledges', i.e. of absolute (i.e. undeniable,
because absolutely certain because absolutely self-referential)
realness moments
10.1.3 ... For '
chit' read: the series (hence ordering) affect
(i.e.
of a row of
tat moments (or quanta))
10.2 ... Only quanta (or units or bits, i.e. whole 1's) @ maximum
(internal) entropy happen as absolutely stable, hence as
absolutely certain
(thus perfect, pure, true, 'good' and so on). Lines, or patterns of
lines
happen as unstable sequences (of random bits), hence are capable of
being
defragmented (i.e. detached from data bits) or compressed (i.e.
detached
from orders of data bits), hence as uncertain
1
10.2.1 ... An (unstable, hence uncertain) line consists of a
sequence of stable (hence certain because @ self-rest) random quanta.
The line (or alignment) of quanta provides reference (i.e. position)
to each quantum in the line (or sequence). Collision between the quanta
in the line provide (i.e. support the reference, displaying as a form
over time) the hardware or
tat affect
1,2
10.2.1.1 ... Consequently,
tat serves to provide realness (i.e.
the hardware affect) to (unreal) reference (i.e. form, appearance).
Reference (i.e. unstable form or appearance) serves to locate and hence
identify
tat (i.e. realness). In other words, reference, cit
(or chit, or citta) deriving from sequence, serves as address for
tat
10.2.1.2 ... A whole real line (i.e.as row of individual realness
moments)
happens as
sat
11 ... For 'ongoing' read: continuous or contiguous.
12 ... For 'realness' (i.e. a realness moment) no longer read: actually
existing as a thing or occurring as a fact. Now read 'realness' to
mean: a moment or quantum (or unit) of hardness,
1 i.e. a hardware (or realness) affect
quantum
12.1 ... A quantum of hardness happens when 2 random
1 (hence virtual) bits, presenting for
contact at the capacity (or quality) of c, collide (always and
only in a relative order (or relativity) free vacuum), thereby creating
a c
2 affect
12.1.1 ... For 'random' read: unordered,
1
hence lacking relativity. Random bits,
lacking relative order, collide (in a relativity free vacuum) as
absolutes,
i.e. as 1> <1, hence @ c> <c. If and when a bit operates
with maximum (internal) entropy, it collides with an absolute dead
(i.e. inertial)
weight of 1
2,3
12.1.1.1 ... For 'unordered' read: not repeating, i.e. once off.
Repetition (in fact differential repetition) operates as (i.e. defines)
order
12.1.1.2 ... If and when a bit not at maximum entropy collides,
therefore with yet active (internal) order that can be de-fragmented
or compressed out, it affects with a dead weight of less than 1, hence
cannot (as a whole) produce a realness moment affect
12.1.1.3 ... For 'dead weight of 1' (hence 'weighty one') read:
Guru 1
12.1.1.3.1 ... Each and every random quantum, therefore capable of
colliding @1 and thereby producing the absolute realness
affect, functions as guru. Each absolute realness moment presents as
absolutely perfect. Consequently, each guru (i.e. as perfect (albeit
virtual) quantum, or, as quantum of perfection) can via (or with) his
act of collision (i.e. of touch) produce the moment of perfection or
the
perfect moment affect