EU       

Back Home Up

 bbermingham@corkcity.ie    www.bbermingham.com 

 

Home
Up
CorkCityCouncil
Role
Membership
History
corkhistory
Ireland
EU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

European Union

 

Cork City Council MOTION

 

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

The COUNCIL of MINISTERS

RE-WEIGHTING OF COUNCIL VOTES

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT QUALIFIED MAJORITY VOTING

ENHANCED COOPERATION

COMMON FOREIGN & SECURITY
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS REGIONS ECONOMIC SOCIAL

COURT OF JUSTICE

COURT OF AUDITORS

FUTURE OF EUROPE

YES

 

Cork City Council Motion -
The TREATY OF NICE
'This Council urges a YES VOTE on the Treaty of Nice aware of its role in a developing European Union and facilitating-
1.The process of enlargement enabling Eastern European Nations the opportunity for economic & social development that Ireland enjoys today.
2. A united, fair, just, prosperous and peaceful Europe.
3 A neutral Independent Europe, developing policies and practices, acquiring allies and friends, contributing and enriching to peoples in need and enriching humanity and civilization into the 21"Ccntury"
(Proposer: Comhairleoir B. Bermingham 02/190)

The Institute of European Affairs, 8 North Great George’s Street, Dublin 1.
web: www.iiea.com

 

IRELAND VOTES YES to the TREATY of NICE

YES

 

Cork City Council Motion -
 Lord Mayor
 Momentous events in Irelands recent history are clearly identifiable,

Ø     1800 The Act of Union.

Ø     1922 The Anglo-Irish Treaty, and of course

Ø     1973 Irelands Referendum 10.05.1972 allow EEC membership - entry into the Common market>European Economic Community>The European Community>and today called The European Union.

All sides in this debate [with few exceptions] agree that the EU has changed Ireland for the better.

The influence of the European ideal-on all its Members States in diverse areas- is significant and magnificent 

From ensuring PEACE and - PLURALIST DEMOCRACY as essential for membership to directing within member states including Ireland - Gender Equality, Consumer Protection, Environmental Protection, Liberalisation of Air transportation, Food Safety, Employment Equality, Health and Safety at Work-.

And in addition for Ireland Industrialisation in attracting modern Industries in pharmacy Electronics and software, with modern ideas in Industrial Relations …etc…etc…have contributed to a better Ireland.

We see around us the EU impact on Greater Cork and the City Manager outlined some of the Monetary gains to this area in reply to a question I submitted a number of weeks ago.

Then and since then, the Irish people agreed in successive referenda on earlier EU Treaties, >>1987 Single European act >>>>1992 Maastrict >>>1998 Amsterdam>o pool our Strength and Resources with other countries in order to be able to achieve more together, than we could ever achieve separately.

The Irish electorate now, faces a truly historic decision as we face the biggest European Union change, for all its members. since Ireland joined in 1973.

 

Ireland has REJECTED the NICE TREATY.
The front-runners for European Union Membership -
Slovenia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Estonia -
have expressed shock and disappointment at the Irish result.

They had looked to Ireland as a mentor - a model for economic growth and success, which has blossomed from European Union Membership.

Have we shot ourselves in the foot?
Has prosperity changed us from a people engaging with the world, contributing to people in need from hunger and disease, protecting people from hostile forces, to a selfish people who want and want and want?

Have we the ability to embrace the European small Nations.
To facilitate them
Joining the European Union.
To deepen and strengthen their Democracy.
To increase their long-term security from hostile nations.
To assist in their prosperity
and economic wellbeing.

I do not believe that we Irish are selfish?
For deep down I feel that the Irish people will take this opportunity –
to lead, enable, facilitate and assist –
fellow Europeans who endured so-much hardship under Fascists and Communists Regimes for so-long, to take their rightful place amongst European Nations, and that they will view Ireland not as
an OBSTACLE, but as a friend in need and a friend indeed.


So lets look at this Treaty again,
The Irish Nation and people deserves a reconsideration of their decision; those who say otherwise are bordering on the hysteria and are
VETOING the people’s fundamentally democratic rights.

1.     It is right and proper that the Irish people exercise

a.      The right to re-evaluate their decision

b.     The right to affirm that decision or to change that decision for whatever reason.

2.     The peoples rights are supreme and may express and change their views.

3.     The “NO” campaign wishes to deny the sovereign right of the people because of their lack of confidence in its outcome.   
 

THE PURPOSE of the TREATY OF NICE is

Ø     To facilitate enlargement of the European Union.

Ø     To address the consequent institutional changes and voting procedures to facilitate efficient operation.

Its STATUS TO DATE is that by now, all but Ireland, have accepted the Nice Treaty - such is the strength of the economic and political move towards EU INTEGRATION AND ENLARGEMENT.
 


ON REPRESENTATION - Ireland gets a good deal from Nice, given the balance to be struck when other countries’ interests are taken into account.

At the end of the Day, it’s not about weighing / Vetoing or Voting but PRESENCE, and Ireland has an abundance of presence.
By 2004 the Following may
co
incide – Irish Presidency of the European Parliament, Mr Pat Cox, Irish Presidency of the European Commission and Irish Presidency of the Council of Ministers. 

It’s only the negative, the small thinkers the little Ireland-ers -who persist in downing Irelands ability to influence an increasingly important Influential Europe in the 21 Century.
In the matter of
Commissionerships, the Nice Treaty establishes equality between large and small states with the dropping of the second Commissioner with the larger states- something that has never existed before. Ireland will keep its Commissioner after the addition of 10 extra states, and should Europe enlarge beyond 27 an EQUAL SYSTEM OF ROTATION will APPLY.
 


ON ITERESTS
Ireland has vital interests to defend in the EU.

Ø     Proportionately, we receive far more from the Common Agricultural Policy than any other Union State. Ireland's case for retaining support for its agriculture will be strengthened as an enthusiastic member.

Ø     One of the strongest incentives Ireland can offer American investors here is the fact, that we play a central role in setting the commercial policies for the largest market in the world - the EU.

Ø     A 'YES 'vote in Ireland may assist the British Government to get approval from their electorate to join the Euro. This would be very helpful to Irish Trade, with Britain and Northern Ireland.

Ø     It would once again monetarily REUNITE IRELAND, something we all desire, excepting it seems - Sinn Fein – and their fellow “NO” campaigners.

 

On VISION
The move to enlarge - to a European Union of 27 States brings an urgent need and challenge for Irish people to realise that

1.     The Treaty of NICE will, in fact, increase Ireland's influence by bringing more members into the Union.

2.     That this country, and its representatives, will be at the heart of decision-rnaking in the largest economic bloc in the world.

3.     So that whilst we hugely benefit from Structural and Regional Funds, Farming, and Business - vital as these are - our interest and our involvement go beyond them.

4.     Ireland Influence at the heart of the European Union should be such as to enable us to shape the trust of European and consequently global policy adhering to our value system for the betterment of mankind.

5.     I want Ireland to tackle global environmental, food shortage, health problems, and trade issues, as part of an independent influentially powerful for good, European Union. 

6.     The time and challenge has come for Ireland to seek to set Europe's constitutional, political, economic and social agenda.

 VOTE         YES

 

Key Elements of the Treaty of Nice

WHY EU? ENLARGEMENT

What changes are considered necessary to facilitate the enlargement of the EU?
 The two main changes that are under discussion are in the areas of.
(a) reform of the EU institutions and
(b) changes in voting procedures.

Why are reforms of the EU institutions necessary?
The present institutions were originally designed for six member states.
The reform of the EU's institutions is necessary to facilitate efficient working procedures after enlargement. 

 

What are the main institutions of the European Union?

There are three central EU institutions in which all member states are represented.
European Commission
Council of Ministers
European Parliament

These three are supported by two other main institutions:
the Court of Justice and
the Court of Auditors.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

What is the function of the European Commission?
The European Commission has three main tasks:
  It introduces EU legislation,
  It implements EU policy as approved by the Council and the Parliament, and
  It acts as a watchdog to ensure member states respect EU law and EU policy decisions.

The President and the members of the Commission are appointed by the member states (subject to the approval of the European Parliament).
The Treaty of NICE also increases the powers of the President of the Commission and makes changes to the manner in which the President is appointed.

In the Treaty of Amsterdam
I
t was agreed that there will be one Commissioner per Member State with  the 5 larger Member States nominating one rather than two Commissioners, provided that the number of votes each member state has in The Council of Ministers was adjusted.

Under the Treaty of NICE

  • Regardless of size each member state old and new will nominate one commissioner from 2005.

  • This will continue until membership of the Union reaches 27

  • when the EU reaches 27 members ,
    the council of ministers will decide the size of the commission.
    This decision must be taken unanimously.
    It is agreed that from that point there will be fewer than 27 commissioners.
    It is guaranteed that the right to nominate a commissioner will be rotated among all member states on a strictly equal and fair basis.

This will for the first time establish full equality between Member States as regards nominations to the Commission.

On the prospect of all member States giving up their automatic right to a member of the policy-guiding commission, the Nice deal stipulates that this will not occur until the EU reaches 27 member States.
That is not expected before 2010 at earliest, and possibly not until 2014, and thereafter a fair rotation arrangement must be unanimously agreed.
 

How would the composition of the European Commission change after enlargement?  The term of the current Commission ends in December 2004.
It is envisaged that in 2004 all member states at that time would each nominate one Commissioner for the following five years.
If the total number of members reaches 27 it is envisaged the European commission would decide upon a system of rotation and may also decide to introduce a ceiling on the total number of commissioners.

 

What is the Council of Ministers?

 The Council of Ministers represents the member states.
The Council meets in different formations according to the agenda, for example:
foreign affairs, finance, agriculture.
The Council of Ministers enacts EU laws jointly with the European Parliament.

It makes its decisions, depending on the issue, either by unanimity or by Qualified Majority Voting (QMV).

QMV, already the most common form of decision-making has been in use since the EEC was founded.
It has been extended in the Treaty of NICE to a further thirty areas.

RE-WEIGHTING OF COUNCIL VOTES
How would voting in the Council of Ministers be affected by enlargement?
 

For decisions under Qualified Majority Voting (QMV),
Voting weights have been adjusted to take into account future enlargement and the loss of a second Commissioner by larger Member States.

each country's vote in the Council of Ministers is weighted in accordance with their population and size but with heavier weighting for smaller countries.

How many votes would Ireland have at meetings of an enlarged Council of Ministers?

  1. Ireland currently has 3 votes of 87 representing 3.4% in a Union of 15 Member States).

  2. At present all votes combined produce a total of 87, with a minimum of 62 required to reach agreement.

  3. After the accession of the 12 present applicants, Ireland would have 7 votes out of 345 representing 2% in a Union of 27.

    • The latter figure is greater than Ireland's share of 0.75% of the total enlarged EU population of 479.5m citizens.

             
For Success VOTES Population
votes %* Union Total IRL IRL% IRL%
87-62 71.26 15 87 3 3.45
345-255 73.9 27 345 7 2.02 0.08
             

*The threshold for a qualified majority has an additional requirement that
a proposal be supported by a majority of Member States and
a requirement for support of States representing at least 62% of the Union's total population will be required.
Areas such as tax, police and judicial co-operation and foreign policy will continue to be excluded.

 

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT


 Members of the European Parliament (MEPS) represent the citizens of the member states and are elected every five years.
Parliament enacts EU laws [jointly with the Council of Ministers),
Establishes the EU budget jointly with the Council of Ministers) and
Supervises the Commission as it implements EU policy.
 

At present Ireland has 15 MEP representing 2.3% of the total number of 626 MEPS in a EU of 15 States
Ireland will have 12 members
representing 1.6% of the total number of 732 MEPS THE UPPER LIMIT in the Treaty of NICE  in a EU of 27States
This  % figure is larger than Ireland's share of 0.75% of the total enlarged EU population.

MEPs work within pan-European political groups representative of their national political parties.

 

ENHANCED COOPERATION

Enhanced Co-operation and Flexibility represents a process by which at least eight member states co-operate together to form a sub-group in a new area of activity, if unanimously agreed by all member states.
It allows other member states opt out if the areas are considered less suited to their needs.

The Treaty of Nice makes changes to the provisions governing the operation of 'enhanced cooperation' agreed in the Treaty of Amsterdam.
The conditions under which it can take place are slightly amended, while at the same time a series of safeguards is set out in a consolidated format.

 

COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY

The Treaty of Nice makes limited change to existing Treaty provisions by deleting references to the Western European Union and by providing a treaty basis for the Political and Security Committee in Brussels.

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION

The Treaty of Nice extends existing EU powers to take action against a Member State judged to be in breach of fundamental principles (including democracy and human rights) by giving it the right to warn a Member State where there is a serious risk that such a breach might occur.

 

FUTURE OF EUROPE

A Declaration on the Future of the European Union
appended to the Treaty of NICE
calls for a wide-ranging debate,
sets up a process leading to a future IGC and
 identifies four topics for consideration.

Competences,
Charter of Fundamental Rights,
Simplification of Treaties,
Role of national parliaments

 Since the Nice Treaty was signed, the process has been taken forward by the Laeken Declaration (December 2001) and the establishment of the European Convention.

 

COURT OF JUSTICE

The entitlement of all Member States to nominate a judge to the Court of Justice is formalised.
Extra powers have been given to the Court of First Instance to allow the Court of Justice concentrate on the most important matters.

COURT OF AUDITORS

The Treaty of NICE enshrines the right of each Member State to nominate a Member to the Court.

COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

The Treaty of Nice makes provision for an increase in the size of both Committees from 222 to a maximum of 350 to allow for enlargement.
 Ireland will continue to nominate 9 full members and 9 alternates to each Committee.

 

IRELAND VOTES YES to the TREATY of NICE

 

 

http://homepage.eircom.net/~bbermingham/