NASCNEWS
The Newsletter of Nasc, the Irish Immigrant Support Centre, Cork
Download
word version here (0.34MB)
Vol.1
Issue 3: Summer 2004
Alot has happened in Nasc since the Spring. The AGM was held in April,
and a new Steering Committee was elected (details inside); work has
also started on the strategic plan. Then there was the expansion of
the EU on May 1st, and the contentious Citizenship Referendum. It passed,
in spite of a vigorous 'No' campaign in the Cork area organised by Nasc.
The following exerpts from Angelique Chrisafis of the Guardian newspaper
(Monday, June 21, 2004) give some opinions on the outcomes of the Referendum.
" Opposition parties say it was a hurried and confused campaign,
and one exit poll showed that a substantial number voted not solely
on citizenship but because they felt "anti-immigrant". Like
Ireland's other historic referendums - on abortion, divorce and the
Nice treaty - the opposed camps have been locked in a mini-civil war.
Everyone expected a Yes vote, but the overwhelming size of the vote
was a shock to many.
"Has Ireland lost its soul? Have we thrown out the best of the
old for the worst of the new?" asked the Catholic archbishop Sean
Brady in the week before the referendum. Now liberal commentators have
joined him in a rush of moral angst.
Immigrants are a relatively new phenomenon in Ireland, arriving with
the economic boom of the 90s. Ireland is now a rich place with a small
population and it depends on migrant workers - principally in the health
service. But it still has relatively few asylum seekers. Last year it
had fewer than Slovakia or the Czech Republic. But most are dispersed
from Dublin and sent to small rural towns that refugee workers say can
be ill-prepared for social change. The Irish Refugee Council said that,
given the lack of a full debate on immigration, the public is confused
about asylum seekers and has not been kept informed by the government.
Ireland's one anti-immigrant candidate in the European elections got
only 2% of the vote in his eastern constituency.
"Out on the street campaigning for a No vote, I was aware of the
high level of xenophobia and racism," said Aisling Reidy, from
the Irish Council for Civil Liberties… We have moved from an inclusive
debating society to a very much more rightwing country."
The Labour Party, along with doctors, human rights activists, Sinn Féin
and even a former US congressman argued that the referendum was launched
with no time for a proper debate.
The National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism is
examining statistics from refugee groups which say racist incidents
have risen since the referendum was announced. Some groups speak of
name-calling, with pregnant black women told: "That baby business
is over." The role of the media is also under scrutiny but the
British tabloids which have a vast presence in Ireland have not been
singled out.
Jean-Pierre Eyanga, from Integrating Ireland, an umbrella group of refugee
organisations, said the Irish were trustworthy people who made excellent
friends, but the referendum had asked them the wrong question and they
had been misinformed. The rumoured "flood" into hospitals
of mothers from developing countries had not turned out to be totally
accurate. The debate has now turned to allegations of a collective amnesia
about Ireland's emigrant past and diaspora.
Ambrose Blake, 66, who left working-class Dublin at 16 and worked as
a plumber on Birmingham's water system for 27 years, said: "We
worked hard in England but we were still abused. There would be 'no
Irish' signs up, we were called Paddies, navvies. We kept our heads
down, we accepted it, that's the nature of Irish people. Maybe because
the Irish had to fight so hard for what they have now, the thought of
other people coming in here makes them feel resentful."
The Irish Times columnist John Waters said the Irish could be presumed
guilty of xenophobia until they proved themselves innocent. "This
country got rich quick and the people were never told they might have
to pay back their dues," he told the Guardian. "The leadership
has abdicated responsibility. This vote will create a two-tier idea
of belonging in Ireland."
OPINION
'Immigration to Ireland
- Learning from America's Experience'
Extracts of a paper given by Bruce Morrison, at the Immigrant Council
of Ireland Conference: 'Immigration, Ireland's Future', 11th December
2003, in Dublin.
I appreciate the reference to my work on Morrison visas. The history
of that legislation was a most powerful lesson in participating in something
as a legislator that changed people's lives and gave them power over
their own future.
Being a destination country is an honour. You do not get to be a destination
country until certain things are true about your society - prosperity,
a general sense of openness and confidence, respect for democracy and
human rights. These traits make it worth trying to get into such a country.
I used to say during the Cold War that there were two kinds of societies
in the world: the ones you needed a visa to get into and the ones you
needed a visa to get out of. So when Ireland joined the list of destination
countries, it graduated from problems of the past to problems of the
future. But those problems of the future are problems of success.
The Need for Policy
The scale of immigration to Ireland is thought to be small because the
total numbers of immigrants each year is only in the tens of thousands.
But this is deceptive. Ireland's current rate of immigration per capita
is double that of the United States. But in per capita terms, Canada
takes twice as many - a rate that Ireland has already reached. You just
cannot ignore having become, per capita, one of the top immigrant destinations
in the world. The fact that the numbers may seem small in absolute terms
really does not matter. In order to be successful with immigration and
immigrants, the government must have comprehensive and thoughtful policies.
This is a key government role. No one else can play it. It cannot be
left to the voluntary sector. It cannot be left for businesses to decide.
What we have learned in the US, is that what scares people about immigration
is the sense that the people in charge are not in charge. On something
that is as deeply felt about a society as who can join and what that
means for the future, feeling a lack of control is just plain scary
to people. Change is always scary to all of us. But when people feel
that change is coming and no one is trying to understand it, manage
it and make it productive for everyone, you are likely to get vicious
and angry reactions that come from fear. Fear of change, fear of difference,
fear of the "other"- these are the big threats to a successful
approach to immigration and immigrants.
In the United States today we have ten to twelve million people living
and working in the country who are illegally present. We have that situation
because we have avoided decisions on preventing illegal employment and
adequate legal admissions for employment. And not having dealt with
these issues, we now have this huge underclass of people who are exploited
and driving down working conditions for legal employees.…In 1986, we
enacted a huge amnesty to allow illegal immigrants to legalise and to
prevent future problems of illegal employment. But we failed to institute
effective policies and here we are, 15 years later back in the same
mess considering a new amnesty. But, if you have amnesties every few
years you can be sure that people will break the rules because they
know that sooner or later they will get relief.
So it is not unusual that Ireland is slipping toward the same mistake
of ineffective or non-existent policy. But it is a mistake to be avoided
or there will be a price in the future. Immigration policy encompasses
many competing considerations about whom you are ultimately going to
be able to welcome into a society. But welcome is the key. When the
people are here, they have to be welcomed and their rights respected.
Immigration ought Not to be about Charity
The Irish got the opportunity to go to America, go to Australia, go
to Britain, go to Canada and eventually enjoy success, that creates
an obligation on the Irish to accept immigrants here. I find this a
very dangerous way to think about immigration.
Immigration is good for countries. Immigrants bring new strength, new
energy. I call immigrants "the self-selected strivers of the world."
Most people stay where they are for all sorts of reasons - including
people who live in awful places where none of us would ever choose to
live. But others have the motivation, energy and ambition to try to
do something to find a better future for themselves, their children
and grandchildren. They move. And it is a very brave thing to do. It
is a very entrepreneurial thing to do. It is taking enormous risks,
investing your life for the future.
One of the reasons the United States has so much entrepreneurial vitality
- and it really is one of the strengths of our country - is because
we have been fed, decade after decade by this new energy of these brave
people who just do not take no for an answer. Accepting people with
this motivation is not about what it does for them. It is about what
it adds to your country. It helps to build your own society and make
it stronger and better.
When you take people on what I would call a "national interest
basis," you respect them for what they are bringing. When you give
charity you create victims. When you give people opportunity out of
the goodness of your heart, you may not think you are expecting anything
of them. But that is the problem. You expect gratitude and subservience,
rather than the competitive energy of the ambitious. Ireland should
not take immigrants because the Irish were immigrants. Ireland should
have a progressive immigration policy because it will be a better country
with immigrants than without. And when you decide how people are going
to come, the same values should be reflected.
The Guest Worker Trap
I think it is a terrible mistake to routinely take immigrants as guest
workers, which is the bulk of Irish immigration today. You call it labour
migration. You can call it whatever you want, but it is taking people
temporarily for permanent jobs… So much of the employment for which
temporary permits are issued is for jobs that are permanent. "What
about bad times?" you say. Sometimes the economy is growing and
sometimes it is not, so there are no really permanent jobs. That is
an abusive way to think about immigrants - to bring them in and then
the first time there is a downturn in the economy, out you go. That
is no way to treat people. That is no way to build strength in your
economy.
My favourite way of describing the labour orientation toward immigration
is the expression, "we wanted workers and we got people."
People are very inconvenient. Beyond the eight hours that they work,
they have sixteen other hours in every day… That is the way we often
think about people, we often think of them as workers... The people
who are coming have the ambition to stay permanently. And when the people
who are coming and the policy under which they come are in conflict,
there is going be a mess. They are not going to leave. They are going
to be like the Turks in Germany, the guest workers. How many generations
of guest workers do we have now in Germany who were brought for seven
years but did not leave? But they did not become part of German society
either.
So Ireland ought to get out of the guest worker trap. The demand for
workers is a
product of government growth goals. These goals cannot be met without
population growth that exceeds new Irish workers entering the labour
force. This is the creation of a permanent employment need. So if you
have a government policy that is built on the idea of increased labour
being available, then that increased labour force ought to be admitted
to the country on a rational basis, related to the economic needs of
the country. But it should be for permanent residence, not as guest
workers. Otherwise, you will create a two-tiered society of which the
extreme is seen in places like Kuwait, where there is a class of idle
rich and temporary workers from Palestine, India and the Philippines
do the work. Permanent immigration fits with a rights-based immigrant
policy. You know these people are not just passing through, they are
joining your society permanently and they must become part of the Irish
nation.
Rights of Families
When you think permanent residence, you think families. When you think
of permanent
residence, you think of the spouses' right to work. What if there were
a law saying, "only one worker in every family. If you're married
only one of you can work. Make a choice. Do not get married or you will
not be able to work." Ridiculous, nobody would ever do that. We
do that all the time to immigrants, right? Well, it is because they
are not immigrants, they are workers. These wives or husbands are like
appendages they are not supposed to have. They get in the way of being
workers. "We did not want that worker; we want this worker; you
are married to the wrong worker." It is all funny is it not? But
that is what we are doing, when we admit guest workers and then find
ourselves debating who in the family can work. So where will it stop?
If you think about these people as joining the society permanently,
you will get these other things right because they follow logically.
You will not get caught in the guest worker trap. And your immigrants
will have rights because they will be treated as Irish.
Asylum Seekers and Refugees
One other thing I want to mention, although briefly, is the issue of
asylum seekers and refugees. Mary Robinson said some very important
things about the International Convention, the rules on who is a refugee
and how narrow the definition is. These are challenging questions. If
you really were to say that whoever in the world has such a rotten life
that they ought to be able to get up and move to a place where things
are really good like Ireland, there are four billion people on that
list...I do not think that anybody thinks that we will make the world
a better place if we take all of the economic and social achievements
of the developed world and just parcel them out pro rata to the four
billion. That development strategy is a loser. So the narrow scope for
refugee protection may be a question almost without an answer. On the
other hand, the convention on asylum and refugees is very arbitrary
and the distinction between persecution and economic deprivation has
no virtue beyond practicality. But it is what exists, it is international
law and it is the standard. And you cannot run your immigration system
pretending that there is a different standard, unless you want to change
the standard. I would not particularly recommend it. I think it is too
hard. Instead, you have to enforce the rules that are there. You should
not use asylum as a backdoor way of doing immigration, because it gets
you smuggling. Smugglers figure out what your Achilles heel is as a
country, what you do not enforce, how you let people in against the
rules. They then charge people huge amounts of money to get to such
a place--like Ireland--to be paid back over a lifetime, enforced by
a kind of criminal enterprise. And then you have got a real mess. So
as with every other part of immigration, tough as it sounds, you have
got to live by the rules. And if the rules are preventing people from
immigrating who you think ought to be able to come to your country,
then you ought to set up rules that allow them through the front door
of immigration, not the back door of failed asylum claims. You also
should not use asylum as the way of fulfilling your international obligation
to help refugees. There are 20 million refugees in camps around the
world, outside of their own countries, which UNHCR has designated as
refugees under international law. Only a tiny trickle of these people
ever gets to go anywhere in the world, whether back home or to be resettled.
If Ireland wants to do its bit for the refugee community in the world,
it ought to sign up to a quota of the most vulnerable and the most injured
of refugees in the world under the UNHCR programme. It is not perfect,
but it is a way to act collectively with the other developed countries
of the world to do something about those problems. Seeing the asylum
seeker process as a primary way to fulfil your obligation is a pretty
poor way of doing it.
Bottom line: Ireland needs a policy about immigration and a policy about
immigrants. It really does not have to look very far for a policy about
immigrants. A policy about immigrants is one that says we treat immigrants
the way we expect to be treated as citizens. And we help bridge the
gap between where they are and where we are in terms of services, in
terms of integration, in terms of education, in terms of becoming part
of the community. Along the way we get the benefit of all the diversity
that goes with those people. But not separate diversity, diversity as
part of the whole. Not losing your identity, but adding your identity
to the whole. As to immigration, it is not the same question. First,
decide what you need as a nation to add to the skills and workforce
you have. Sell the decision to the people of Ireland, based on the interests
of the nation. Then be sure to enforce the rules that have been chosen,
so what is seen on the streets reflects the law on the books. By that
route, an informed and confident populace will not be nearly as xenophobic
as they appear when they think the politicians have abdicated the duty
to lead, inform, and enforce a democratic consensus.
Fairwell to Pierre.
Pierre Basantu, a native of the Congo has been an asylum seeker
in Cork City for over a year. In that time Pierre committed himself
wholeheartedly to Nasc and the Congolese Irish Partnership in particular,
and he has served with distinction on both committees of those organisations,
in building links with both immigrant and Irish communities. By his
kindness and generosity to others Pierre is now a native of Cork. Sadly,
Pierre has been ordered out of the hostel in North Quay Place and to
better accommodation in Dublin. We wish him well in the future, and
hope to seem him in Cork again soon - very soon. You will be missed,
Pierre. Adieu for now.
Nigeria
By Mariam Olusoji,
Chairperson on Nasc's Steering Committee.
Nigeria is located in West Africa, bordering the Gulf of Guinea between
Benin republic and the Cameroon. Nigeria also has as its neighbours
Chad and Niger Republic.
Nigeria was a British colony and gained her independence on 1st October
1960 while Abuja is its capital city. It is the most populous Country
in West Africa with a population that exceeds 140 million and having
more than 250 ethnic groups. The largest groups which make up to 29%
of the population are the Hausas and the Fulani, other large groups
includes the Yoruba, Ibo (Igbo) and the Ijaws.
Religious practices include Islam, Christianity and indigenous beliefs.
Nigeria has English as its official language while there are other dialects
which include amongst others Yoruba, igbo, ijaw, hausa, Ibibio, anang,
itsekiri. Ishan, edo etc,.
Democracy is the current political dispensation. Nigeria is abundantly
blessed with mineral resources. The major source of Nigeria's resources
is Crude Oil, which is the major source of its foreign earnings. There
are a lot of tourist attractions in Nigeria (e.g. beaches, Plateau Springs,
Zuma Rock, Olumo Rock, Obudu Cattle Ranch amongst others). Nigeria is
also blessed with a rich culture, like traditional dances, food, festivals
e.g. new yam festival.
Ordinary day-to-day life is quite simple. Nigerians wake up n the mornings,
say their prayers and go to their different places of business and at
the end of the day go back home to rest and prepare for the next days
activities. Naturally Nigerians are capable of doing alot of things
for themselves like, wood carving, farming, mat making, pot moulding,
and cloth dyeing just to mention a few.
There are a lot of reasons why people leave the Country, these include
war, (religious, tribal, etc), and human rights abuses. There are a
lot of cases whereby people engage the services of death merchants who
are paid a good sum of money to kill people who they see as threats.
Prominent citizens are victims of this type of attack (e.g. the killing
of a Minister of Justice of the Federation in cold blood is a case in
point, and up to now the killers are still walking the streets as free
citizens). The government cannot guarantee the life of its citizens
in a situation where the police force is quite corrupt.
There are also issues like circumcision, and also areas where people
are regarded as slaves and ostricized from the society. They are regarded
as outcasts. There are also situations whereby the widow is forced to
sleep alone in a room with the corpse of her dead husband and also to
drink the water that have been used to bathe the corpse. In the northern
part of the country where the vast majority of the people are Muslims,
there are alot of human rights abuses, such as the stoning of women
who are accused of adultery and also the amputation of limbs for stealing.
Under-aged girls are forced to marry very old men triple the age of
their fathers.
Nigerians are stigmatised as bad people and are therefore unpopular.
Whenever we are in the midst of new friends and tell them we are Nigerians,
their attitude changes automatically. Every lapse by a Nigerian is exaggerated
and used to make all Nigerians look bad. A large number of Nigerians
are in universities around the world, including Ireland and they are
all law-abiding citizens. They are proud to be Nigerian and they frown
on anyone who brings shame to their beloved country.
There is great potential in Nigeria. The economy may not be too good
but the spiritual, the intellectual and many other things are in abundance.
Nigeria is the most advanced black society in West Africa with cities
to rival those in America for architectural style.
People are always looking at the bad sides of Nigeria. Why can't people
name the Nobel prize winners, the soccer players and scientists? In
most Countries you find Nigerians the top of their class. Nigerians
are hard working people. The first multi-cultural Irish newspaper was
brought to life by two Nigerian journalists. Again the first two black
Lawyers to be called to the Irish Bar are Nigerians. Nigerians manage
90% of the African shops in Ireland. People need to get close to Nigerians
to know that we are true human beings because we have big and kind hearts.
It is a fact that no one is perfect. There is no Country in the world
that you will not find some bad eggs and Nigeria is no exception. There
is no Country in the world where you will not find promising, law-abiding
and honest Nigerians.
I will like to conclude by leaving a question for you to ponder on,
'How could anyone hate a whole Country because some of its people are
bad?'
New Nasc Steering Committee
Nasc held its agm and vision day in Cork last April, and the following
Steering Committee was elected: Mariam Olusoji (Co-chairperson), Angela
Veale (Co-chairperson), Pierre Basantu (Treasurer), Noel Cosgrove (Secretary),
Olga Golovnya, Robert Habimana (Staff liaison Officer), Aki Stavrou,
Vitaliy Makhnanov (PRO) and Adeola Olatokunbo. Gertrude Cotter continues
on the Committee as Coordinator.
The Nasc subgroups have been very busy, with the group behind the Referendum
No Campaign being the most active, and involved with meeting with the
Public, distributing leaflets and talking to the media.
Thanks to all who have given their time and energy to the No campaign
Some Facts & Figures
Refugee applications:
The number of applications for refugee status continues to fall dramatically.
For the first five months of this year 2,036 people applied for refugee
status, compared to 4,089 for the same period last year. The main nationalities
of the applicants continue to be similar - being West African and East
European.
Work Permits:
To date there have been a total of 15,224 work permits granted by the
government this year. Of these, 1,092 permits were granted to employers
in Cork City and County. And of these, 424 were new permits, and 648
were renewals (the remaining 20 belonging to group permits). The charts
below begin to show the effect of the expansion of the EU on May 1st,
though it is too early to draw conclusions. There is a clear decline
in the number of new permits issued:
(Sources ORAC, and Department of Enterprise, Trade & Employment)
Rent Allowance Entitlements for Immigrants since May 1 2004
By Fiona Hackett.
From 1 May 2004, you must be habitually resident in Ireland to quality
for social assistance payments.
What this means in practice is that, in general, if you have been present
in Ireland for 2 years or more,
work here and have a settled intention to remain in Ireland and make
it your permanent home, you will
satisfy the habitual residence condition. This habitual residency rule
applies to everyone, regardless of his or her nationality. The onus
is on you to prove that you have been habitually resident in either
Ireland or the rest of the Common Travel Area.
1. The position of the Health Board in relation to any application for
Supplementary Welfare
Allowance/Rent Allowance from Asylum Seekers in Direct Provision who
come from EU Accession States is as follows:
i. As and from the 27th May 2003, Rent
Supplement is not payable to a person who is not lawfully in the State
or
ii. Has made an application for Asylum under the Refugee Act 1996 and
such application is awaiting
final decision by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
or
iii. Has made an application under the Aliens Act 1935 to remain in
the State and such application is
not being determined. Before Rent Allowance can be paid, an Asylum Seeker
in the first instance, would
have to withdraw his or her application from the Asylum process and
provide documentary evidence to
that effect to the local Community Welfare Officer.
The question then arises as to what is the status of these persons after
the date of withdrawal of their
application from the Asylum process. It would appear that such persons
are not lawfully in the state and
should be referred to the Garda National Immigration Bureau or the local
Garda Registration office, so that an application can be made under
the Aliens Act 1935 to remain in the State. In accordance with Circular
02/03 from the Department of Social and Family Affairs, such applicants
are not entitled to Rent
Allowance pending a determination of their application to remain in
the State. There is however, no valid
reason why applications for Basic Payments and/or Exceptional Need Payments
cannot be considered by the local Community Welfare Officer.
2. There is no change in respect of Asylum Seekers who are not in direct
Provision. If they are
in receipt of full Supplementary Welfare Allowance they will continue
to receive same. If they are in
receipt of reduced Supplementary Welfare Allowance, i.e., 19 per week,
they will continue to be entitled
to these payments. With effect from 1st May 2004, the full provisions
of Section 17 of the Social Welfare
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2004, come into effect.
All applications for Supplementary Welfare Allowance, regardless of
nationality, are required to be habitually resident in the State in
order to qualify for upplementary Welfare Allowance. If they are not
habitually resident in the State, they will not be entitled to Basic
Supplementary Welfare Allowance and/or Supplements. However in certain
circumstances, some persons in the State who are not habitually resident,
may be entitled in exceptional circumstances to some Exceptional Need
Payments and/or Urgent Need payments.
3. Those persons entering this State from any EU country looking for
housing, will apply to Cork City
Council and/or Cork County Council in the first instance. If the Housing
Authorities are unable to
house them, they will be referred in the same manner as the indigenous
population to the various homeless accommodation centres in the functional
area of the Health Board.
Further information available from www.threshold.ie
www.oasis.gov.ie.
'Do Me Justice'
Oh, here I am from Donegal. I feel quite discontented
To hear the way that we're run down, not fairly represented.
For they say it is a general rule, to make poor Pat a knave or fool,
But never mind, we'll play it cool and speak up for Old Ireland.
CHORUS: Do me justice, treat me fair and I won't be discontented.
Nor I won't be laughed at anywhere, but fairly represented.
There's Mister Punch with his literature; he tries to hurt us sadly.
Whene'er he draws our caricature, he depicts us rather badly.
With crooked limbs and villainous face he represents the Irish race.
I'm sure it is a great disgrace, we think so in old Ireland. CHORUS
When on the stage I do appear with a thundering great shillelagh,
With tattered hat and ragged coat, you think I'd step out gaily,
With not a word of common sense. They don't know when they give offence.
But carry on at Pat's expense-just let them come to Ireland. CHORUS
They say we're lazy and dirty got, but what's the use to grumble?
For when they enter our Irish cot, they're welcome, though it's humble.
In public works the country around, or where hard work is to be found,
In a railway tunnel underground, you'll find the boys from Ireland.
CHORUS
It's very true I like a glass. It makes my heart feel frisky.
And I'm very fond of an Irish lass and partial to the whiskey.
I'm very quiet when left alone. I do what I like with what's my own,
But woe betide the foes, Ochone, who dare run down old Ireland. CHORUS
Taken from a recording by Len Graham, who got it from Eddie Butcher.
Nineteenth century (thanks to John Slattery)
Nasc Noticeboard
Who is Nasc??
Nasc (meaning 'link' in Irish) is a non-governmental organisation
whose aim is to provide an information and support service to asylum
seekers, refugees and immigrants in the Cork area - and on a partnership
basis. Our services are provided by a team of volunteers and a full-time
Coordinator.
Nasc is a drop-in centre that provides a welcoming atmosphere for both
the immigrant and Irish communities.
Nasc provides general information clinics on immigrant rights and entitlements,
as well as legal clinics. These services are free of charge. To make
an appointment phone us at 021 4317411 or visit us at St Maries of the
Isle Sharman Crawford Street, Cork. You are most welcome.
Centre opening hours are from 10 am to 6 pm Monday to Friday (closed
lunch-time 1.15 to 2.15pm and during bank holidays).
NascNews is a quarterly newsletter published by Nasc-The Irish Immigrant
Support Centre.
We will consider any contributions to NascNews, the views expressed
in it are not necessarily those of the Nasc Steering Committee.
Closing date for receipt of contributions for the Autumn NascNews is
30 September 2004.
Phone 021 - 4317411
Email nasccork@eircom.net
|