HomePage | MainStory | SideStories | Sources | Info re Book | Contact | QueriesComments |
Organizations & Teams
The Organization
(family, school, etc) which matters in terms of accelerating the development
of the individual's key characteristics by providing the right kind of
problems is a combo of the intensive, sustained, typically small, interpersonal,
problem solving units of which the person is a part (teams), and the support
structures surrounding them. Examples of such organizations which provided
a perfect match between the characteristics of the individual that were
later crucial to s success in a particular field (ie. key characteristics)
and the problems which the organization needed to solve would include,
eg, *The young Mozart’s obvious potential as a musical prodigy fitting perfectly with the needs of his 40 yr old father, sand-bagged in the musical backwater of Salzburg, ever working away at his symphonies, his concertos, his grande serenades, his oratorios -- Leopold ever frustrated, ever denied his “honour”, ever looking to escape. With Linz and Vienna just waiting, with Versailles and London and Munich ever ready, ever hungry, ever eager to see God’s next tiny “little miracle”, Wolferl with his perfect pitch was the ideal match for the needs of his father, who had already started intensively training his older sister, who was one of the finest music teachers in all of Europe.
'Organization' refers to larger, more formal organizational unit - eg family, school, athletic club, university, film studio - which ensures provision of resources and sufficient stability for the problem solving unit (‘team’) to operate effectively. Such larger organizational structures typically provide access to numerous, often related problem clusters for the individual, and sometimes the necessary resources, and teams to solve them. Needless to say, the organizations involved are not only formal/ institutional ones, but also informal/ community-based ones such as the Okemah of Woody Guthrie's childhood or the New Orleans of Louis Armstrong's (or the working class district of Paris where Pierre-Auguste Renoir grew up in the 1850s, the one that just happened to have the Louvre round the corner). In early years of development the team and organization inevitably overlap greatly. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi & his colleagues (1997), for instance, argue that "complex families" are crucial to the development of "talented teenagers". Such families provide both the resources (abundant materials/lessons, private work areas, freedom from chores, etc) and the intensive personal relationships with "high levels of support and challenge" which serve to "enhance children's investment of attentional energy in growth-producing activities". Likewise Benjamin Bloom's research team (1982) discovered that "the most striking finding in talent development is the very active role of the family, selected teachers, and sometimes peer group in supporting, encouraging, teaching, and training the individual at each of the major stages in his or her development". Robert Albert’s analysis of “Families as Ongoing Systems”, with particular reference to the Brontes... continues in Arrival
… Teams outside the family - in later childhood and beyond - are equally critical to the continued development of key characteristics. In their extensive study of talent development in teenagers, Csikszentmihalyi and his colleagues (1997) devote almost an entire chapter to the crucial role of teachers in this process. Their focus is on the characteristics of "reciprocal relations between the practitioner master and the apprentice pupil", a relationship whose "ultimate success depends on the fit between two unique and often incompatible individuals" - ie., on how well the student and the teacher work together as a team. Examples of such master/apprentice teams are abundant in every field of human excellence.
… Teams are equally essential to the problem solving involved in accelerating the development of intellectual and personality/self characteristics. Those associated with intellectual development are easily seen - eg above. Those associated with personality/ self are equally obvious but not so loudly broadcast. For example, there is little re the specifics of personality/self development in Bloom et al's classic book (1985). You can get a better sense of such development, though little systematic analysis of it, in McCurdy (1983) whose 'geniuses' are afterall long since safely departed.
References cited above are available in Arrival. see Sources.
|