Homepage
Analysis
Glossary
Solution
Translation: knowledge
1
Definition: affect
2,3
Resulting from: contact
4
Analysis:
1 ... For 'knowledge' (Sanskrit: jnana) read:
either (an unrelated quantum (or bit or moment) of)
realness 1,2
(Sanskrit:
tattva
);
or a relativity (i.e. as series
or sequence)
of realness moments
3.4 (Sanskrit:
chit
or citta)
1.1 ... For 'realness' read: hardware (or matter) affect. It happens when
2 random bits collide directly, i.e. 1 >< 1,
1 therefore in a relativity vacuum. Consequently
the hardware affect
is (i.e. affects as) (absolute)
1.1.1 ... For 'quantum (or bit) of realness' read: inertial (hence initial)
state
1.2 ...
Knowledge
(i.e. jnana) as realness affect
is called primary knowledge
, i.e. standing on, hence fixed (and certain) knowledge. It happens prior
to location, therefore void of time and form (and which emerge with relativity).
Primary knowledge
is (wholly sufficient)
1.3 ... For 'a relativity (of realness moments)'
1
read: software affect. It happens when a bit (i.e. an inertial
state) collides (indirectly) with a string of bits (i.e. as in a 1 ><
(1,1,1,1 ... to n) connection), i.e. with an ongoing sequence (of inertial
states). The software, hence mediation affect relativizes (and thereby locates)
the realness affect
1.3.1 ... For 'relativity of realness moments' read: active (hence continuing,
i.e. discretely discontinuously transmitting, i.e. propagating) process
1.4 ...
Knowledge
(i.e. jnana) as relativity (of realness moments, hence
knowledge of trace displaying as location)
is
called secondary (to nth)
knowledge
,
i.e. understanding
1
1.4.1 ... Relative knowledge is unreal because uncertain (because active
(i.e. open)), because not @ rest. Because unreal, relative knowledge affects
as insufficient
2 ... For 'affect'
1
read: from Latin
ad- 'to' +
facere 'do', i.e. 'do to, work
on, influence'
2.1 ... Affect (i.e. 'do to' or 'done to') happens in two ways, i.e. as
1 >< 1, therefore direct contact
1
; or as 1 >< (1,1,1,1 .... to n), therefore indirect contact
2
2.1.1 ... 1 ><1, i.e. direct
1
contact produces (the sense of) absolute realness
2,3
2.1.1.1 ... For 'direct' read: immediate, i.e. without mediation, hence
in a (relativity) vacuum. Contact in a vacuum happens c >< c, thereby
producing the c
2
(read: c square) affect, i.e. the affect of absolute realness
1
2.1.1.1.1 ... For 'absolute realness' read: constant, certain,
1 true and so on (Sanskrit:
tattva
or tatya, not satya)
2.1.1.1.1.1 ... The letter c is taken to symbolize constancy or certainty
rather than the speed
1
of light in a vacuum
2.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... For 'speed' read: (transmission) rate. The basic transmission
(or communication) rate (of instructions) is calculated (and which is relative)
but not known directly (hence absolutely). The alleged speed (or transmission
rate) of light (or light quanta) happens relative to the observer (i.e.
to his basic programming as response pattern). In relation to a (self-constant)
human (or to the self-constant machines he constructs) the basic transmission
rate of instructions remains a constant
2.1.1.2 ... For 'absolute realness' read: the hardware affect,
1 elsewhere called 'thatness' (Sanskrit:
tattva) or 'suchness'
2.1.1.2.1 ... For 'hardware affect' read: fact'ness or factualness, elsewhere
symbolized as datum, i.e. a (constant) given
2.1.1.3 ...
Since absolute realness
(i.e. perfect factualness) happens @ contact
in a (relativity)
vacuum, it
happens without location
1
(i.e. form) or duration
2
(i.e. time). Consequently, the affect of absolute realness (i.e. of the
moment of perfect is'ness or fact'ness) happens without display (or elaboration)
of any kind,
3
therefore
is perfectly meaningless
(i.e. because unrelated)
2.1.1.3.1 ... Location (i.e. form
1
) happens as whole (hence quantized) display of contact angle shifts (vis
a vis an observer) of a series (or string) of (random) contacts, hence
as standing wave (or looping string) whole-affect. The shape of a location
depends on the processor's (internal) response (program) pattern
2.1.1.3.1.1 ... For 'form' substitute: symbol. A symbol (or form, i.e.
as repeating series of random bits) operates as a fiction, hence as empty
of (absolute) factualness. The function of a symbol is to transmit relative
(i.e. localized) meaning, i.e. position or address
2.1.1.3.2 ... Duration
1
(i.e. time) happens as display of a series' (or string's) length, i.e.
of the quantity of (random) contacts. Duration (hence time) depends on
the processor's (internal) response (program) pattern (or length). In other
words, duration (hence time) happens as reified (as a symbol, hence as a
fiction) function of quantity (of contacts)
2.1.1.3.2.1 ... For 'duration' read: closure of function (i.e. as string
interaction) rate (elsewhere interpreted as speed). @ 1 >< 1 (hence
factual) contact, duration (hence time, and of course form or symbol) has
been eliminated
2.1.1.3.3 ...
Realness
(i.e. the absolute fact affect) happens without boundary, therefore
without self. In short, (absolute) realness (i.e. fact or quantum
status) has no identity since the latter emerges with non-vacuum (i.e. relative)
interaction. Whole non vacuum interaction happens void (Sanskrit:
sunja
) of absolute realness. The degree of realness of a whole non-vacuum interaction
depends on the length of the string
2.1.2 ... 1 >< (1,1,1,1 .... to n)
1
, therefore indirect
2
contact produces (the sense of) location (
reified
as symbol, image or form)
2.1.2.1 ... The symbol (or symbol pattern) (1,1,1,1 .... to n) represents
a string or series of random (in relation to each other) bits (i.e. of absolute
(because singular, hence operating as inertial states, data). A string as
such (i.e. as a whole), since its components happen as random (i.e. unrelativized),
operates as a fiction, whereby each individual contact produces an unlocated
fact (as realness moment) but the string as a whole produces an unreal (or
virtual) location
1
2.1.2.1.1 ... Therefore a string (reified (i.e. stilled) by a self-still
(or quantized) observer as a whole form, symbol or image) if both real and
unreal. In other words, each individual contact within the string produces
a moment of absolute (but non-located) realness (i.e. factualness) but the
series (or sequence) which produces a whole form (or image) functions void
of realness, and hence presents for contact as a fiction (i.e. as wholly
imaginary)
2.1.2.2 ... For 'indirect' read: mediated, hence not in a (relativity)
vacuum, thereby producing an @ less than c
2
affect, thereby remaining unreal (i.e. virtual)
3 ... Therefore,
affect (hence knowledge,
Sanskrit:
jnana)
happens either as direct
, 1 >< 1
contact producing absolute
(therefore not relativized, i.e. non-located)
realness
1 (i.e. a
fact
or datum, i.e. an inertal (or standing) state); or
affect happens as indirect , 1 >< (1,1,1,1 ... to n)
2 interaction
producing a relative but
unreal
location (i.e. a symbolic representation as
fiction, i.e. an active (or under(i.e. as in not standing still)
standing) process)
3.1 ... For the affect of 1 >< 1 contact read: primary (or prime,
hence non-compressible, hence absolute) knowledge (i.e. jnana, meaning; Sanskrit:
tattva)
3.2 ... For the affect of 1>< (1,1,1,1 .... to n)
1 interaction (as multiple contact) read: secondary
(hence non-prime because compressible because relative) knowledge
2 (i.e. jnana, meaning; Sanskrit:
chit
or citta)
3.2.1 ... Since the 1 >< 1 contacts within a string happen prior
to the completion (i.e. as completed propagation) of the string (hence to
its quantization as a potential (therefore virtual) real affect), the quality
of realness produced by each 1 >< 1 contact precedes that of image
1 (or form or symbol (or location) generated
by the whole string)
3.2.1.1 ... Therefore all images
1
are grounded in absolute realness. If and when an image is reduced (or
restricted) to zero (i.e. to merely 1 >< 1 contact), absolute realness
remains
3.2.1.1.1 ... For 'image' read: a self-superimposed whole (hence stopped
or sliced) affect of an aggregate (or sequence) of absolute contacts (i.e.
of real bits of primary knowledge). Processing of image (or the sequence of
which it happens as stilled after-affect; Pali:
nimitta) is called
con'sciousness (Sanskrit:
citta), i.e. the coming together of individual
bits of absolute (or primary) knowledge (Latin:
scientia, from
scire 'to know')
3.2.2 ... Secondary knowledge, i.e. (relative) understanding happens either
as (factual, because sliced or stopped by the observer)
know-what1
or as (functional, because traced (i.e. replicated) by an active observer)
know-how
2
3.2.2.1 ... Know-what operates as whole quantum, i.e. as a fixed, i.e. inert
location (i.e. as aggregate of absolutes) capable of being contacted as a
stable (i.e. @ maximum entropy) reality, i.e. as a formal datum
3.2.2.2 ... Know-how results from sequential (hence the function of) tracing
(or re-propagation). It results in functional understanding, i.e. in
awakening
1 to the whole
means (i.e. as relative way or program) of a given fixed (hence 'sleeping')
image (or formal datum)
3.2.2.2.1 ... The Buddha awakened (i.e. as in samma sambodhi) when he produced
a functional understanding
1
of the e'mergence and mergence (i.e. as re'mergence) of whole (complex)
quanta (i.e. aggregates). Having solved the problem, his problem solving activity
(i.e. as expended capacity) returned to rest, i.e. to initial state capacity.
He interpreted the sudden back-flow or surge of capacity as increased lightness
(or brightness (read: enlightenment), thereafter interpreted as joy (or bliss)
3.2.2.2.1.1 ... Therefore the difference between the awakened Guatama and
the sleeping rest was that he had acquired a functional grasp of image (or
con'sciousness; or the objects of everyday reality) and they had merely a
factual (hence not conscious) grasp of image (or the objects of everyday reality,
i.e. whole life-forms). Therefore the awakened Buddha realized that all (complex)
objects happened as real but illusionary observer (hence solipsist) superimpositions
whereas the sleeping rest (the sleeping Buddhas) experienced all (complex)
objects (i.e. the everyday world) as real
4 ... For 'contact' read: 1 >< 1 (hence in a relativity vacuum)
collision, strike
1
, touch
4.1 ... True (hence real making; Sanskrit; tattva, wrongly interpreted
as sattva or satya (meaning true)) strike happens @ random
1 (i.e. as unpredictable, i.e. as absolutely
different, i.e. unordered). The strike is responded to, hence functions as
(self-) instruction
4.1.1 ...
'Only random bits (or events,
i.e. inertial states
1
)
carry instruction'
4.1.1.1 ... For 'inertial state' read:
guru
;
bodhisattva