English translation: that
Meaning: different
Origin: sliced sameness
Function: relativizes
Home
Analysis
Glossary
English translation: that
1
Meaning: different
2
Origin: sliced sameness
3
Function: relativizes
4
Analysis:
1 ... 'That'
1
functions as an unreferenced
2
adjective
3 that
determines
4
1.1 ... From Old English
thaet, nonimative and accusative singular
neuter of
se 'the' of Germanic origin: related to Dutch and German
das
1.2 ... From Latin
referre 'carry back', from
re 'back' +
ferre 'bring', meaning to connect back to previous facts. In
short, for 'unreferenced' read: having no factual (hence real) basis
1.3 ... For 'adjective' read: a word naming an attribute of a noun,
1 hence a pronoun, i.e. a virtual noun. Turning
(i.e. nominalizing) a pronoun into (i.e. as) a noun is fundamental cheating
1 (i.e. when it comes to defining the nature
of reality)
1.3.1 ... For 'noun' read: from Latin:
nomen 'name'. In short, for
adjective read: a (pre') (therefore virtual) name
1 for a name
1.3.1.1 ... Compare Sanskrit:
pranam,
1
meaning to bow or bend to, i.e. salute, worship
1.3.1.1.1 ... For
pranam read: Sanskrit: OM, i.e. the initiating
(to naming) sound
1
1.3.1.1.1.1 ... The pronoun (or pre'name) 'that' also operates as initiating
sound, i.e. as a virtual (hence in place of, and
random) name, i.e.
as an (universal) act of salutation or worship
1.3.2 ... The inventor of the Chandogya Upanishad cheated when he nominalized
the pronoun 'that' (Sanskrit:
tat)
1
to describe the essence (i.e. as noun) of reality and then retained 'that'
as stand alone definition. Since both the
tat (i.e. 'that') and the
essence it serves to determine (albeit virtually) remain undefined, his
tattvamasi
(read either as 'That thou art' or as 'Thatness art') remains fundamentally
meaningless, but a wonderful pranam (i.e. salutation) nonetheless
2
1.3.2.1 ... 'That' is nominalized (or
reified
) as that'ness,
1
Sanskrit:
tattva
1.3.2.1 ... The term 'ness'; Sanskrit:
tva (also meaning 'you), serves
to quantify, i.e. to close or fix as an independent whole (i.e. to reify)
1.3.2.2 ... Shankara, nor indeed Badarayana before him and Aurobindo in modern
times, never saw the need to analyze the term
tat, nor indeed
tattvamasi in discrete detail. He used both
tat (i.e.
as description of the essence, meaning Brahman) and
tattvamasi (i.e. as all everyday appearance being Brahman) as
premise, having accepted them as sruti (i.e. as Veda), therefore requiring
no proof. That was a serious error
1
1.3.2.2.1 ... It served his religious cult purpose to use
tattvamasi as a pranam (indeed mantra), i.e. as an (verbal) act
of worship rather than as verifiable (or falsifiable) evidence
1.4 ... For 'determine' read: from Latin
determinare 'limit, fix'
1 from
de- 'completely' +
terminare 'terminate', i.e. close or end, thereby eliminating indefiniteness
(and uncertainty)
1.4.1 ... For limit, fix' read:
reify
(or nominalized) as a fact (i.e. as a logic unit)
2 ... For 'different' read: not same
1
2.1 ... For 'same' read: Sanskrit: sama
1,2
2.1.1 ... Hence for '
samadhi
' read: bringing together (or making superior) as same, by
elimination (or restricting; Sanskrit:
nirodha) difference
2.2 ... Read 'same' (or sama) to mean: lacking other (or more), meaning
singular,
1 i.e.
not dual or multiple
2.2.1 ... From which follows that
yoga
(as technique of yoking or fixing together) operates as:
intent (or the functions applying that intent)
to singularity 1,2
2.2.1.1 ... For 'singularity' read: (logic) quantum (hence random bit)
status
2.2.1.1.1 .. Singularity (hence yoga perfected) is achieved by ending
(i.e. shutting down) any process (or function) and which returns a (disturbed,
i.e. active) process to @ maximum entropy status (Sanskrit:
nirvana
)
3 ... When sameness (i.e. @ maximum entropy) is sliced (hence disturbed),
2 thatnesses emerge
1
3.1 ... The goal of
yoga
is to eliminate (or suppress) disturbance
1 (or turbulence) by eliminating the differences
(as duality or multiplicities
2
) which cause it
3.1.1 ... Eliminating disturbance reverts a system (i.e. an ongoing
(real) process (Sanskrit:
sattva
)
1,2,3 to inertial
(therefore initial) state status
3.1.1.1 ... For
sat read: 'being', i.e. the participle of be
3.1.1.2 ... For
sattva read: the nominalized participle 'being', i.e.
as reified 'thing'
3.1.1.3 ... For
sattva read also: (the function of ) the ongoing interaction
(or connection) of differentials (i.e.
tattvas) as it affects
a quantized (i.e. self-sliced, hence stopped) observer (or affectee)
1
3.1.1.3.1 ... Therefore understand
sattva to mean:
S(attva) =
n
T(attvas)
c2
3.1.2 ... For 'multiplicity' read: (a string or series (i.e. as series of
sameness slices) of) 3 to n. A multiplicity, therefore string
1 or pattern of strings of differences (i.e.
of
tattvas) operates as
citta
2,3,4
(i.e.
chit'tvas)
3.1.2.1 ... A string (or sameness slices), when repeated, produces a relativity,
i.e. a location or address, i.e. a form. It is form (i.e. the stringing affect)
that is interpreted as mind (or consciousness, i.e. as the coming together
of a series of 1><1 tattvas, i.e. of thatness (read: knowledge) quanta)
3.1.2.2 ... For
chit (or cit) read: stringing (or sequencing)
3.1.2.3 ... For
chittva (or citta) read: string or sequence (i.e.
program)
3.1.2.4 ... The Sanskrit term '
citta' is most often interpreted
as translated as: mind-stuff or mind. That's a fudge
4 ... Creating a relativity, i.e. a relationship of differences (or differentials)
makes three functions (and their affects) possible
1,2,3
4.1 ... It allows the differences to be eliminated, thereby returning a sliced
state to its initial state (capacity), i.e. to nirvana (i.e. as disturbance
'blown out')
4.2 ... It allows the 2 slices (i.e.
tattvas) to collide in a vacuum
(since no other relativities exist that could mediated the collision), thereby
producing the
absolute realness affect
of 1 >< 1 (hence c >< c) collision, usually symbolized as
c2
4.3 ... It produces string (or relationship) interactions (read: programs)
which a quantized (i.e. self-stilled) observer self-experiences (or self-interprets)
as form (i.e. as location or address, i.e. a
chittva)
1
4.3.1 ... A string (or sequence) of reified strings (or
sequences, hence forms) is interpreted by a quantized observer as either
'matter' (if tactile and outside) or as 'mind' (if touching inside, i.e.
in the brain)