Derivation: from Sanskrit root verb 'budh'
Translation of 'budh': awaken
1,2
Word state: perfect passive participle
3
Meaning: understood
4,5
relatively
Analysis:
1 ... For 'waken'
1,2
read: from the Dutch
waken and German
wachen, meaning
'guard' or 'watch', meaning either observe attentively or keep under protective
observation
1.1 ... For 'a' (i.e. as in a'waken) read: from the German 'auf', meaning
start up, begin, commence (i.e. attentive observation)
1.2 ...
For 'awaken' read: rouse
from sleeping or cause to stop sleeping,
1
i.e. activate, i.e.
start up the
observation function 2,3,4
1.2.1 ...For 'awaken' (Sanskrit:
budh) read also: arouse,
revive, restore to life (i.e. activity); open or expand; elicit
1.2.2 ... For 'observation function' read:
Vipassana
, i.e. seeing (or accessing) many ways, therefore relatively
1.2.3 ... For 'observation function' read: interaction operation, locally
interpreted as peripheral scanning (i.e. via serial contact). A system
awakens if and when its inert (i.e. @ rest, hence passive, hence asleep)
state becomes active (and hence open) via interaction with other (inert)
states
1
1.2.3.1 ... Through interaction, an inert state dissipates its initial
state capacity, thereby losing (i.e. sacrificing, i.e. emptying) its realness
(i.e. as wholeness) potential
1
1.2.3.1.1 ... @ 1 >< 1 (i.e. direct, hence absolute) contact, all
of an (inert) system's initial state capacity is expended (i.e. sacrificed)
to produce a moment (or quantum) of absolute realness. @ 1 >< (1,1,1,1
.... to n) (i.. indirect, hence relative) interaction, a system dissipates
(hence fragments) its initial state (hence @ 1) capacity relative to the
length of the string with which it interacts
1
1.2.3.1.1.1 ... Defragmentation, i.e. the elimination of serial, hence
relative interaction,
1
reverts a system to its initial (i.e. @1) state capacity
1.2.3.1.1.1.1 ... Defragmentation, i.e. elimination (or restriction)
of serial interaction is the essence of
Buddhist meditation
(i.e. samatha bhavana) and of
Yoga
1.2.4 ... For 'observation function' read: generating consciousness,
1 i.e. the stringing together (e. to a locally
meaningful, because producing a relationship, form) of individual realness
(hence primary knowledge, elsewhere called
tat
) moments
1.2.4.1 ... In other words, waking up (i.e. buddha) means becoming conscious
1 via serial, hence functional (i.e. active)
interaction, i.e. by developing functional knowledge, called understanding
(elsewhere called
chit
, citta or chittva)
1.2.4.1.1 ... By contrast, sleeping means not starting up serial interaction,
hence remaining unconscious (i.e. inert), i.e. generating no relative, hence
functional understanding
2 ... For 'awaken' read: begin relative (i.e. 1 >< (1,1,1,1 ....
to n) contact
1,
i.e. enter into relativity
2
2.1 ... Relative (hence serial or string) contact produces (relative)
location or position, hence (self or own-) form. (Relative) location (therefore
form; Pali:
rupa) is (self-) interpreted as (relative) meaning
1
2.1.1 ... Therefor for 'meaning' read: differential (relative, hence
contrasting) location (i.e. as (relative) form or position, currently called
'address'), the latter (i.e. as relative differential) presenting devoid
(Sanskrit:
sunja) of (absolute, because not @ rest, hence
not inert) realness
2.1.1.1 ... The awakened (i.e. buddha) Gautama
1 understood (i.e. processed relatively,
therefore consciously) that since all locations (i.e. rupas) were not @
rest, hence active in (hot) turmoil, therefore suffering (Pali:
dukkha
). In order to eliminate the suffering (i.e. dukkha) they would have to
return to rest, and which he called nirvana (i.e. serial interaction (hence
relativity, therefore
consciousness) blown out). Only the @ rest
(therefore unconscious) state guaranteed non-turmoil, hence freedom from
dukkha. And only the @ rest state was (in theory at least) permanent and
therefore, in his (albeit mightily flawed) view, good (i.e. Pali:
kusala
)
2.1.1.1.1 ...
The difference between the awakened
(via consciousness) Gautama
and and his sleeping followers
is that he
processed relatively, thereby
generated
(non-substantive, because relative, hence secondary knowledge as)
understanding and they
processed absolutely, hence substantively (therefore prior to consciousness),
thereby
produced (merely apparent,
i.e. self-referential)
realness
1 (i.e. primary knowledge)
2.1.1.1.1.1 ... In other words,
the awakened
Gautama operated functional (i.e. indirect, i.e. mediated, i.e.
1 >< 1,1,1,1 .... to n) access
1
(i.e.
understanding), i.e.
he understood (i.e. was fully conscious of) the emergence and mergence of
what he was accessing and
his sleeping followers
operated factual accessing (i.e.
contacting), i.e.
being, i.e. they were
made real by their act of (direct, immediate, i.e. 1>< 1) accessing
and consequently felt (and believed) themselves (i.e. as self-referencing
emerged forms) and that which they accessed (i.e. alternately emerged forms)
to be real
2.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... Functional access, and which locates (i.e.
relativizes), produces understanding, or 'off' standing (i.e. perspective).
Standing 'off' fails to produce the realness moment (achieved by standing
1 >< 1 'on'), therefore is empty (of realness). In other words,
all understanding (i.e. self-referencing location, i.e. consciousness),
as secondary (to nth) knowledge,
is empty
, i.e. is not
2.2 ... The Sakyamuni, Gautama generated relative knowledge (i.e. consciousness)
primarily by analyzing wholes. He fragmented (i.e. broke up) wholes to recover
their constituents or precursors. By so doing ( i.e. rudimentary science)
he discovered that a whole functions merely as a local (i.e. observer generated)
quantised aggregate and that the latter has no (permanent) self-existence,
i.e. is empty of self
1
2.2.1 ... He concluded from his newly won perspective, derived from multiple
(i.e. vertical fragmentation) viewing (or access), that to attach to a whole-form
that operated merely as a temporary and destined to decay aggregate would
lead to suffering (resulting from the loss (of the gain) of attachment)
3 ... Reconstruct 'perfect passive participle' to read: done
1, in-active
2 (function) fragment
3,4,5
3.1 ... For 'done' read: Latin:
perfectus, 'completed', i.e.
ceased, finished, ended, i.e. @ rest, @ maximum entropy
3.2 ... For 'in-active' read: non functional (i.e. passive), i.e. interaction,
therefore communication ceased, i.e. inert, dead, unconscious; in
nirvana
3.3 ... For 'participle' read: a word formed from a verb and used as
an adjective
1 or
noun.
2 From Latin:
participare,
3
'to share in'
3.3.1 ... For 'adjective' read: from Latin
adjacent- 'lying near
to' from
adjecere, from
ad- 'to' +
jacere 'lie down'.
An adjective (i.e. a verb participle, operating as independent 'particle'
or fragment) serves as means of description, i.e. as means to increase
relativization
3.3.2 ... For 'noun' read: a (still) word used to identify (or
name), i.e. differentiate. A noun (or name; Pali:
nama) functions
as
reification
(stilling) of a function (i.e. of an interactive aggregate (or particles
or fragments, i.e. bits or quanta). Reification (i.e. of an open or ongoing
process), hence quantization (i.e. a whole 1) is required if a process
is to be made real by 1 >< 1 contact. In short, an open or running
process, i.e. a (1,1,1,1 .... to n) series, cannot be grasped, i.e. made
real as such. For that to happen, an ongoing observation process must be
sliced or cut by a quantized observer who then superimposes his state of
inertia on the process to be grasped (or observed)
1
3.3.2.1 ... Awakening
1
(i.e. the achievement of buddha status, i.e. the viewing mode of the
aroused or alerted (i.e. to the relative), happens when quantization (i.e.
reification) is reversed (or eliminated). In other words, at awakening,
both observer (as stilled process) and observed (as stilled process) revert
to process
2 operation
(or function) and reveal themselves as wholly relative (aggregations of
interactions) and as such empty of substance, i.e. of realness (since realness
happens only at 1 >< 1 (hence quantum >< quantum) contact (i.e.
touch)
3.3.2.1.1 ... For 'awakening' read: becoming conscious, i.e. generating
a location, i.e. locating (a) realness (moment)
3.3.2.1.2 ... For 'revert to process (operation)' read: loosen up, i.e.
start moving, fluctuating, interacting serially, hence relatively
1
3.3.2.1.2.1 ... For 'interacting relatively' read: practicing (i.e.
as in operating)
Vipassana
(to wit: 'seeing many ways')
3.3.3 ... The Latin verb
participare is derived from
partire
, translated as 'divide, share'
3.4 ... A 'perfect passive participle' operates as a (verbal) fragment,
slice or cut of an on-going (or analogue) function, hence as a particle
serving to generate (i.e. invent) a relationship or relativity. Slicing
(thereby holding as a still (moment)) happens when a still (i.e. functions
ceased, hence quantized) observer
1
superimposes his state (i.e. of non-function, i.e. of stillness)
3.4.1 ... For '(still) observer' read: the quantized or unitized (i.e.
as a localized fragment), therefore
reified
function of observation
3.5 ... The Buddhist self-deception happens like this. The past passive
participle 'buddha' (meaning awakened, actually meaning conscious) derives
(i.e. is invented) from the verb 'budh' (awaken). The past passive participle
is then nominalized (and reified) as (the) buddha (i.e. as object), thereafter
personalized (later deified) as
the Buddha, thereafter universalized
as (impersonal principle)
BUDDHA (alias Brahman as
chit or (secondary)
jnana
). St. Paul, alias the pharisee vigilante Saul of Tarsus, used the same
sleight of hand (i.e. mental trickery) when he reified the Greek verb 'anoint'
(i.e. khriein) via its past passive particle into the (universal person)
CHRIST, the latter then being used to invent
his Chrestos cult, i.e. Christianity. That was serious deception
4 ... For 'understood' read: having perceived (i.e. via serial contact)
meaning
4.1 ... For 'meaning' read: location
1,2,3 or position. Location emerges initially
as the result of arbitrary aggregation of realness moments, i.e. as the result
of string (i.e. program) connection (i.e. application). Thereafter location
operates (i.e. repeats) to sustain itself (i.e. as independent quasi reality)
4.1.1 ... For 'location' read: a completed (hence stopped) string (i.e.
as random series of bits, repeated as sequence and which operates as order)
4.1.2 ... Interpret 'location' to mean: self (i.e. as ego), i.e. an aggregate
(or string) of random bits that defines (i.e. operates as boundary that differentiates
and thereby distinguishes, hence identifies). Since an aggregate as such
functions devoid of realness, its self-representation as self or ego likewise
functions devoid of realness
4.1.3 ...
Since location is arbitrary
, i.e. since it results (initially) from arbitrary stringing together of random
realness quanta,
meaning (i.e. as
understanding)
is arbitrary
(i.e. not localized), i.e. observer (i.e. as relative and arbitrary (or
random), hence highly uncertain and unstable) aggregation) dependent
1
4.1.3.1 ... Consequently
all understanding
(i.e. consciousness, the affect of the stringing together of realness
moments and the relative meaning generated by it)
is arbitrary, hence
empty
of realness (and hence of absolute truth)
4.1.3.1.1 ... From which follows that Gautama's verbal transmission of
his (highly localized) understanding (or
vipassana) functioned as
rhetoric of emptiness. It served
merely to return systems with dis-located, hence unordered (therefore in hot
turmoil) consciousness (read: lacking meaningfulness) to the state of sleep
(i.e. to inertia, i.e. to maximum entropy), by giving the impression that
waking up had happened. In like manner, all other understanding (i.e. consciousness,
hence self-meaning) sets function to induce emptiness (and return to initial
state capacity) and its whole self-affect, namely @rest unconsciousness
5 ... For 'buddha'
1
read: having functional (hence relative) understanding, hence an active
(hence animated, albeit arbitrary) perspective. In short, for 'buddha' read:
conscious
5.1 ... For '
Buddha' read: an individual who has generated functional
understanding (i.e. an active (i.e. animated, therefore relative perspective),
i.e. who has become conscious by inventing (local, therefore personal) meaning
(i.e. relative location). In short,
a buddha is an individual who has invented either horizontal,
vertical or functional
consciousness
(i.e. perspection)1
5.1.1 ... In other words,
an awakened
(hence conscious)
individual is one
who
processes an (or the hypothesized)
absolute (i.e. a hard (i.e. inert,
@ rest) fact, i.e. a realness moment)
relatively
(hence symbolically).
A sleeping individual
(elsewhere called a puttajana, i.e. wordling) is one who
processes a (or the hypothesized)
relative
(i.e. the symbolic)
absolutely
Victoria na Gig
Buddhist meditation
Jnana Yoga