Jnana Yoga
Suggested meaning: realization of the oneness of all living systems
Detailed definition: visual representation of the fundamental sameness of difference
How it works: self-state superimposition
Ontological significance : variable, from nil to 100%
Home Analysis Glossary
Suggested1 meaning: realization 2 of the oneness 3 of all living systems 4
Detailed definition: visual representation 5 of the fundamental 6 sameness of difference 7,8
How it works: self-state 9 superimposition 10
Ontological significance 11 : variable, from nil to 100% 12
Analysis:
1 ... Suggested by a tiny minority group who claim, without providing verifiable evidence, to be mystics, spiritual adepts, yogis, brahmacharis, god-men, god-women and so on
2 ... For 'realization' read: make (self-) real. Such realness is virtual, hence fundamentally non transmittable; for instance (verbally) ineffable
3 ... For 'oneness' read: 100%@ or (@1) sameness; Sanskrit: sama 1 or samma
3.1 ... The Sakyan muni (Sanskrit: sage, i.e. wise guy), Siddartha, alias Gautama, who called himself the Buddha, claimed (and his claim was never verified or falsified) that he had achieved samma-sam-bodhi . Unfortunately (i.e. for Western devotees of the Buddhist religious sect) the term samma-sam-bodhi was translated by early Christian would-be linguists as 'the fully enlightened one' or 'the perfect one.' The term actually means: same-same-knowledge, i.e. unchanging knowledge of the unchanging, whereby bodhi can be understood either as primary knowledge, i.e. as direct experience or as secondary knowledge, i.e. as representation of relationship
4 ... For 'living system' read: active (i.e. activated by a self-active observer) string or sequence or file 1 (Sanskrit: sutra) of random (hence virtual) realness quanta (or bits) (Sanskrit: tat 's); in other words, an ongoing appearance (or address) (Sanskrit: sat )
4.1 ... For 'string, sequence or file' read: a linear progression 1 (or propagation) of quanta (Sanskrit: cit, or chit ) grasped wholly (i.e. as a mass) that traces out, hence creates, a relativity, i.e. a relationship
4.1.1 ... For the collision affect (on a random, hence non self-progressing quantum or bit) of progression (or propagation) read: energy. 1 The amount of energy transmitted at contact between quanta is 1c
4.1.1.1 ... Therefore, e = mc2 can be re-written in ancient Indian verbal symbols as
1chit = 1tatc2 , or chit (of n) = sat c2 , whereby chit is defined as a sequence of tat moments, sat is defined as (quantized, by a quantized observer) mass of tat 's and c2 (i.e. c squared, i.e. multiplied by itself) describes the collision, hence realness affect (in a vacuum) of two tat quanta. Wow!
5 ... For 'visual representation' read: differentiation via the visual channel. 1 . Only difference can affect 2 and thereby trigger a re-presentation. Sameness cannot be represented. Hence the notion of visual representation of unity, i.e. of oneness, meaning , samenessis a non starter
5.1 ... Representation can happen via any of the brain generated sense channels and via intellection and intuition. In most instances, the self-affect of the universal unity (i.e. oneness) of all living systems is self-represented as as a low to strong intuition, and which sometimes intensifies as a whole system, i.e. body and mind experience
5.2 ... Only random events (i.e. points, bits or quanta) carry instruction. Sameness, i.e. (common) order, compresses out prior to contact
6 ... For 'fundamental' read: ground or basic. Often 'ground' or 'basic' are generalized as 'universal' or 'universally supported'
7 ... For 'difference' read: from Latin differre , from dis- 'from away' + ferre 'bring carry.' In everyday terms, for 'difference' read: 'other', 'not this', i.e. a bit of sameness at a difference location (or site), or approaching for contact at a difference angle
8 ... Reread 'sameness in difference' as: sameness 1,2 grounding or underlying difference. In short, difference emerges from sameness and returns to it. How that happens is still a mystery. It could be argued that difference happens a dislocated or turbulated (i.e. @ less than maximum entropy) sameness
8.1 ... For 'same' read: from Sanskrit: sama, i.e. @ 1, @100%, whole, complete, united , 1 perfect, logic status, i.e. without, i.e. released from (hence having achieved moksha) disturbance, turbulence, i.e. in nirvana
8.1.1 ... It should be clear by now that unitive vision, i.e. the visual representation of the united, hence of same2 (here read: same squared, i.e. multiplied with itself) is impossible to achieve,1 a fact not lost on Badarayana in his Brahma Sutras, but denied by the fool Shankara (et al), lately reinvented by the confidence trickster Blavatsky and from whom Sri Krishna Prem and Sri Madhava Ashish of Mirtola Ashram borrowed it
8.1.1.1 ... Individuals who claim to have had the unitive vision 1,2 (or any other representation, physical, emotional or mental) are seriously confused or lying. When united, no vision remains since vision (i.e. representation) derives from difference (i.e. from non-unity, or non-@1'ness), hence from relativity. Either a system is united, i.e. @1, therefore a virtual entity which, being disconnect (i.e. without relative location), 'waits', unaffected (i.e. in nirvana). Or a system interacts, hence operates as dis-united, i.e. with its initial state capacity fragmented, thereby generating a position (i.e. a referential system capable of self-representation via sequential contact). As a fragmented system it cannot know, i.e. experience unity
8.1.1.1.1 ... For 'unitive vision' read: a vision (hence a representational mode) that sees united, i.e. that unites. The unitive mode happens when a system, is self-united, i.e. @ 1, i.e. @ absolute rest. In the rest (i.e. maximum entropy) state it projects, i.e. superimposes, its state (quality), namely wholeness, oneness, initial (or end) state perfection 1 and so on upon that with which it interacts (i.e. collides). The unitive vision (or experience) becomes possible when a system reaches (i.e. reduces or reverts to or advances to) the capacity (i.e. the processing speed) of perfection, i.e. of maximum absorption (hence condensation or compression)
8.1.1.1.1.1 ... A system's initial state capacity is relative to it. 1 However, upon achievement the system experiences (i.e. self-represents) its own initial state as absolute (thereby forfeiting its initial state capacity), since it then 'wait's @rest, hence without any turbulence caused by differential action (read: difference)
8.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... From which follows that any system that succeeds in returning to its own (hence relative) initial state capacity 1 achieves the (potential) experience (or knowledge, i.e. chit ) of the absolute (i.e. of the 'one without a second') initial state
8.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... The return to initial state capacity (hence to a difference , ivacuum.e. to 'waiting mode') actually happens millions of times per second. However, the 'waiting mode' affect (i.e. the nirvana non-affect) is so small (i.e. subsubtled quick, i.e. timeless) that it is almost impossible to observe with ordinary, everyday attention. Individuals adept at the Buddhist absorption techniques, the Jhanas, or highly skilled Yogis can register the affect at will. The affect can also be faked, then made real by means of Ganser (syndrome) training
8.1.1.2 ... Sri Yashoda Mai, founder of the Mirtola Ashram, whose most illustrious guru was Sri Krishna Prem, claimed to have had the unitive vision. Unfortunately for us, she never told anyone what she saw and how it affected her. The claim that the unitive vision, i.e. the self-representation of fundamental sameness, is ineffable is spurious
8.2 ... For 'sameness' mis'read read: having the quality of the same, hence no quality (i.e. differential affect) at all
9 ... For self-state read: turbulence1 rate (therefore relative connectivity, hence communication spread 2) of an observer
9.1 ... For turbulence read: (random) movement
9.2 ... For 'communication spread' read: entropy
9.3 ... For 'observer' read: reflection location or site (i.e. Sanskrit: darshan; Latin: templum)
10 ... For 'superimposition' read: projection 1
10.1 ... In other words, the unitive vision (or experience) appears to happen when a system (i.e. a self-reflecting observer) projects its self-state capacity 1
10.1.1 ... @ maximum (i.e. @100%, hence zero stress) capacity, that is to say when a (virtual) state 'waits' at non-interaction, hence absolutely stress 1 free, it projects its absolute unity upon the next bit of contact. In other words, the unitive vision (or experience) happens when an observer projects her self-state of (internal) unity, i.e. her state of absolute rest. That means that she does not see (or experience) unity, but sees (or experiences) anything she observes (i.e. interacts with) as wholly unified (i.e. same) because she is @100% 2 unified. If she (i.e. her self-processing state) is fragmented (i.e. in turbulence) she will project her state on whatever she 'sees.' In other words, seeing the (ground or basic) unity (i.e. sameness) of all appearances happens as function of the observers state of unity
10.1.1.1 ... For 'stress' read: pressure, tension, strain and so on. The latter emerge when a system emerges from calm 1 , i.e. from rest, i.e. from quantum status, i.e. from maximum entropy
10.1.1.1.1 ... The self-affect of stress is loss (i.e. as displacement or spread, thus of agitation or turbulence) of (contact) capacity. reduction of stress returns capacity to a system. Reversion to quantum status, 1 i.e. to maximum entropy, returns (or reverts a system to) initial state capacity
10.1.1.1.1.1 ... Reversion to initial state capacity by eliminating capacity displacement (into agitation or turbulence) is called YOGA
10.2 ... For '100%' read: @1, therefore whole, complete, perfect, done, closed, ended, certain and so on, therefore absolutely calm, without turbulence, unmoving, still
11 ... For 'ontological significance' read: 'being' affect; or affect on a system's 'being'-as-state1
11.1 ... In this regard, see 'The Light at the Centre' by Agehananda Bharati. Bharati was one of most intelligent and perceptive observers and fearless commentators of the Indian darshan scene. Sadly his rather gross experience of fundamental non-difference, i.e. of 'numerical oneness' as he calls it, came too early in life, and when he did not have the the discretion to give it its finest definition. Paraphrasing that most wonderful of Irish mystics, Oscar Wilde, 'the Great Realization, like (the wonder and ecstasy of) youth is wasted on the young'
12 ... Whether or not the unitive (i.e. fundamental sameness) vision (or experience) affects an observer depends on the self-state 1 of the observer, in much the same way as the realization that winter, death, taxes and the eventual death of this earth complete will all life forms on it will inevitably come
12.1 ... In other words, it depends on the state of self-unity (i.e. of self concentration or condensation, hence of stillness) of the observer, i.e. on her degree of non-fragmentation of initial state capacity. In other words, the more intense her concentration, the more real the observed will appear to her and the more it will affect her1
12.1.1 . Professional mystics, i.e. those who claim that the unitive vision (or experience, i.e. merging with sameness, i.e. as in samma-sam-bodhi) is the ultimate aim and highest achievement that human can aspire to, will claim absolute meaning and ontological status for their goal (and its achievement). Well, they would say that, wouldn't they?! In fact, since every living system experiences the state of self-unity (and of absolute rest; read: nirvana) prior to each individual (and hence whole) interaction, it's no big deal