Yoga
as defragmentation process

Definition:   yoke ; fix to 1
Meaning: make steady
Goal: achieve @1 capacity
Means:  eliminate capacity fragmentation
 
Home           Analysis         Solution       Glossary


Definition:   yoke ; fix¹ to 1 ²
Meaning: make steady³
Goal: achieve⁴ @1⁵ capacity ⁶
Means:  eliminate capacity fragmentation ^7,8,9

Analysis:

1 ... For 'fix' read: get or put together (Sanskrit: adhi)
2 ... By fixing to 1, i.e. 1 >< 1¹ , a system becomes as 1,² hence @1³
2.1 ... For '1' read (or write: (0), i.e. a (virtual) quantum of dead weight
2.2 ... For 'as 1' read: same 
2.3 ... For '@1' read: @ 100%. If and when @100% (contact) capacity is applied, a system operates in a relativity vacuum, ¹ therefore presents as a virtual reality (Sanskrit: tat )²
2.3.1 ... For 'relativity vacuum' read: empty of difference ^1,2
2.3.1.1 ... For 'difference' read: relativity, i.e. that which offers relationship, hence 'other' status
2.3.1.2 ... Re'read 'empty of difference' to mean: same (Sanskrit: sama ^1,2)
2.3.1.2.1 ... The function of yoga (i.e. as problem solving activity) is to eliminate difference, and the turbulence (hence friction, and whose affect is interpreted as suffering) processing difference causes, thereby returning a system to initial state (hence 100% or @1) sameness, elsewhere called 'the unchanging'. The ultimate goal of yoga is to eliminate all turbulence (i.e. activity ¹) by eliminating all difference (i.e. relativity) thereby terminating life (i.e. continuity (i.e. rebirth ²))
2.3.1.2.1.1 ... Therefore continuity, i.e. birth as rebirth
2.3.1.2.1.2 ... Only difference (i.e. otherness) is born¹ (i.e. has a real affect or makes an actual appearance or ). Sameness cannot be born. During contact (i.e. actual connection that produces a quantum of realness) sameness (i.e. common order) is compressed out. Hence the original ground² (and which is sameness; Sanskrit: nirguna brahman) never appears
2.3.1.2.1.2.1 ... Only difference (i.e. fragmented sameness, or wholeness) decays, thereby causing pain. Sameness cannot decay
2.3.1.2.1.2.2 ... Named by Chan Buddhists 'the face before your father's ¹ birth' and by Meister Eckhart 'the ground'
2.3.1.2.1.2.2.1 ... For 'father' read: that which activates or moves, to wit: the chela
2.3.1.1.2 ... When a system gets itself together (i.e. defragments) as same, i.e. when it eliminates difference (and thereby continuity) and becomes fixed (or fixated (hence in psych'osis ) @ or as (capacity) 1), it achieves sam'adhi
2.3.2 ... Therefore presents without an identifiable self (i.e. without a distinguishing mark). A tat (i.e. a quantum of dead weight, i.e. a guru) happens as potential random impact that makes real @ (1 >< 1) contact. The random impact cannot be compressed since it lacks relativity (and all internal movement)
3 ... For 'make steady' read: achieve steady^1,2 state status
3.1 ... For 'steady' read: @ maximum entropy ¹
3.1.1 ... For '@ maximum entropy' read: non-self-communicative because absolutely self-still,^1,2 i.e. without self-differential order³ (i.e. as differential ordering or instructing) capacity
3.1.1.1 ... A self-still (i.e. internal communication, hence turbulence ceased, stopped, shut down, dead) system presents for contact as an order of 1
3.1.1.1.1 ... For 'order of 1' read: guru , i.e. a quantum of dead weight
3.1.1.2 ... For 'self-still' read: enstatic. An enstatic system is nominalized as 'ens'. A non-self-still, i.e. a turbulated (or fluctuating, hence self-communicating) system (i.e. a real form) is nominalized as an 'ecs' (derived from ec'static, i.e. as 'standing (or connecting) beyond' ens status)
3.1.1.3 ... For 'differential order (-ing)' read: (Sanskrit) chit or jnana , meaning string¹ or sequence (hence relative) contacting (or touching)
3.1.1.3.1 ... Imagine a 'string' as: (1,1,1,1 .... to n) ¹, whereby each 1 (more correctly written as (0)) of the series or row (and which becomes an order (or byte) via termination (i.e. slicing or cutting, therefore quantization) and repetition) happens as an order of 1, i.e. as a random bit (of dead-weight), i.e. as a self-static ens (i.e. guru). ²
3.1.1.3.1.1 ... Read '(1,1,1,1 .... to n)' to mean: byte ¹
3.1.1.3.1.1.1 ... For 'byte' read: chela or shishia, i.e. devotee
3.1.1.3.1.2 ... The function of a string¹ (i.e. of a devotee or chela) is to provide (i.e. serve or support as) relative position (or location, hence address) and/or continuity (if open) to the non-relative (i.e. absolute, because random, hence virtual) bit (as non-continuous quantum of dead weight, i.e. guru)
3.1.1.3.1.2.1 ... The (relative) weight (i.e. as instruction, hence real-making capacity) of a string decreases with its length. Its length determines its closure speed. Closure speed (delay) is referenced locally as time
3.2 ... For 'steady' read: @ 100%, therefore certain ^1,2

3.2.1 ... For 'certain' read: perfect, pure, true, good, absolute and so on
3.2.1 ... The goal of yoga is to return (i.e. as in reduce) a system to (absolute, i.e. @ 1 = @100%) certainty, ¹ hence to perfection, purity, truth, goodness, absoluteness (i.e. to @1'ness) and so on
3.2.1.1 ... The goal is achieved when a string (or byte, i.e. a chit (or chela)) is reduced (or compressed) to a single point, i.e. to a singularity
4 ... For 'achieve' read: reach, attain¹ , in other words, stop, cease, end, shut down a process; die
4.1 ... For 'achieve, as reach or attain' read: return to stop, ¹ advance to stop, ² connect with and stop ³
4.1.1 ... For 'return to' read:  return to GO, therefore to initial state status, by shutting down, i.e. be eliminating - as withdrawing from - (capacity) fragmentation
4.1.2 ... For 'advance to' read: complete or close a process by ending, therefore shutting it down
4.1.3 ... For 'connect with' read: stop by colliding directly
5 ... For '@1' read: @100%¹
5.1 ... For @100% read: completed, finished, ended, ceased, shut down, closed, in stasis, hence enstasis, therefore perfect, good, true, certain, self-absolute and so on
6 ... For '@1 capacity' read: the capacity of wholeness or completeness, i.e. quantum or logic point (Sanskrit: tat) capacity, hence the capacity to strike as a non compressible random point capable of making real
7 ... For 'fragmentation' read: split, divide, cut (Latin: cidere , i.e. as in cision), slice, break down into fragments, ¹ thereby making un'steady, hence un-whole, incomplete, in'sane, hence untrue, uncertain, imperfect, insufficient (as realness) and so on
7.1 ... Capacity fragmentation happens when a system splits (and diverts) its @100% (contact) capacity to more than 1 connection, thereby connecting (to each connection) @ less than 100%. By connecting @ less than 100% it loses its ability to make each connection absolutely real. The more it splits ^1,2 its capacity, the more it loses its realness generating capacity
7.1.1 ... The more it splits (i.e. fragments) its whole (hence steady (i.e. fixed) state, hence death state) capacity, the more it comes alive, i.e. moves, becomes turbulated, agitated¹ and so on
7.1.1.1 ... According to Patanjali , restriction (i.e. to the point of elimination) of agitation is the goal of yoga
7.1.2 ... For 'the more its capacity is split' read: the more connections it invests its capacity in, i.e. the more connections it makes. By investing its capacity in more than 1 contact, a system relativizes, i.e. develops relationship and continuity (i.e. apparent life). The relationship generated provides it with a relative (and on-going) form (i.e. as location as position, i.e. an address), locally interpreted as meaning
7.1.2.1 ... The more connections it makes the more complex (hence alive, i.e. turbulated, active) its form becomes, albeit at the price of loss of realness (and therefore certainty). In short, form (i.e. relative (or differential) appearance) is purchased at the price of loss of realness. Increase of realness is purchased at the price of loss of form, hence of de-fragmentation ¹ (of capacity)
7.1.2.1.1 ... For de-fragmentation read: de'cision ¹, i.. the removal of cut, split or slice
7.1.2.1.1.1 ... For 'de'cision' read: reduction (of a string) to a logic outcome (or point), i.e. to a singularity, hence to quantum (thus steady (hence death) state) status
8 ... For YOGA read: elimination of capacity fragmentation, hence of capacity loss (hence of uncertainty) resulting from its dissipation into multiple connections
8.1 ... For 'elimination of capacity fragmentation', i.e. for de'fragmentation read: reduction of connections ¹ to zero
8.1.1 ... The self-affect of reduction of connections is loss of (self-) form Sanskrit: rupa, elsewhere termed: chit) and increase of connection capacity ¹
8.1.1.1 ... For 'increase of connection capacity' read: increase of freedom (Sanskrit: ananta, lit. unlimited). If and when connection capacity reaches (i.e. has been returned to) 100%, that is to say, when all connections have been cut off and all form (and therefore continuity, i.e. life) eliminated, a system achieves absolute (i.e. 100%, hence initial state) freedom, therefore the freedom to connect at random, hence to make (i.e. experience itself as) absolutely real or to initiate any string (i.e. create any form (as location or position)
8.1.1.1.1 ... Therefore the goal of yoga is the death (i.e. as elimination) of form (i.e. as local identity born of turbulence, therefore of pain (Sanskrit: dukkha) and of continuance (read: (re-)birth)
9 ... Understand yoga to mean: defragmentation of fragmented capacity. ^1,2 Defragmentation returns a system to (its) initial state (hence @ rest; Sanskrit: nirvana )) capacity and which may or may not be applied to initiate realness or appearance (i.e. location)
9.1 ... In hinayana (Buddhist) or saguna terms the process of yoga can be written as: 

(1,1,1,1 .... to n) > ¹ 1²

9.1.1 ...  For '>' read: reduce or shorten by means of elimination
9.1.2 ... For '1' read: an actual quantum of dead weight, i.e. an actual (i.e. active) guru (i.e. as affective quantum of dead weight) more correctly symbolized as (0)
9.2 ...  In mahayana (Buddhist) or nirguna terms the process of yoga can be written as:

((0),(0),(0),(0) .... to n)  > (0) ^1,2

9.2.1 ... For '(0)' read: a virtual quantum of dead weight, i.e. a virtual (often and wrongly called a sat) guru
9.2.1.1 ... Mahayana Buddhists realized that 1's, i.e. whole quanta, happen devoid of self-identity, therefore are empty and that therefore strings of quanta and which produced form were empty too. Hence: ' Form is empty.' Their primary focusing device therefore became emptiness (i.e. non-difference) itself and which returned the meditator rapidly to stillness, i.e. to initial state capacity and which could then be used to produce a primary contact moment which produced the affect of absolute (i.e. non-relative, albeit meaningless because lacking location (or form)) realness
9.3 ... It can initiate absolute realness (therefore certainty) by using (i.e. applying) its whole (initial state) capacity as a single (random, non-compressible), i.e. 1 >< 1, strike (i.e. contact or connection). Or it can initiate form (i.e. appearance and continuity) by fragmenting its capacity to contact a (compressible) series of connections (i.e. as in 1 >< (1,1,1,1 ... to n) striking) whereby its realness (and certainty) diminishes with the increase in the number (and compressibility) of connections it makes

Return to top