Support for the M. Sc. in IT in Education at Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland |
info@dPortfolios.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAVIGATION |
Thesis
Proposal: October 2001
|
Rory O'Toole M. Sc in IT in Ed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PRELIMINARY
FINDINGS THESIS
PROPOSAL SECTIONS Presentation
on
|
Please describe the research
area/topic on which you propose to work under the following headings: Project Title (Include both the deeper question of your research
and the specific focus of your work. If your work is part of a larger/funded
project please also include the name of the project: Proposed Supervisor: Dr. B. Tangney Project Summary: The research project will
investigate the use of an ICT artefact (the Digital Portfolio Aid) that
is designed to assist practicing teachers in the related activities
of reflective practice and self-evaluation. The DPA will support the
preparation of a reflective portfolio. The research focus
of the project is to explore the degree to which the artefact can support
reflective practice. It is anticipated that participants in the study
will use the artefact for a period of 8 weeks. During this period they
will be expected to: 1.
Record, develop and review a personal
philosophy of education that is centred on their teaching practice. 2.
Use the DPA to plan and evaluate a series
of lessons. 3.
Identify areas of their practice that
are deemed to be in need of remedial action. 4.
Use the DPA to record changes in teaching
practice arising out of their participation in a programme of supported
reflective practice. 5.
Incorporate the data arising from using
the DPA, as well as external data such as graphics, text documents and
web pages, into a professional reflective portfolio. Your own expertise and
how well you will be positioned to carry out the work: I am competent is basic ICT
use and am capable of designing an ICT artefact that will be based on
a Microsoft Access 2000 relational database. I have previous experience
of undertaking research at postgraduate level. Potential benefits of
the Study: The main area of educational
research to which the current study will contribute is that of the use
of the portfolio in reflective practice. The rational for the study
comprises a number of inter-related strands: Meaningful changes in educational
practice can only be brought about where practitioners incorporate changes
into their day-to-day practices. Research suggests that mandated curriculum
changes via exclusively top down models of educational change
have limited impact on classroom practices. ·
Critical-reflective
practice is one model of curriculum development that sees the teacher
as a key researcher of his or her own practice. Reflective practice
is regarded as having the potential to support action research. ·
The use of the professional
portfolio has the potential to support reflective practice. The portfolio
can take many different forms, with the use of ICT-based portfolios
considered a potentially useful way to develop and maintain a professional
portfolio. ·
Based on a relational database, it is
feasible to develop, deploy and evaluate an artefact that can assist
teachers in the development and maintenance of a digital portfolio.
This portfolio can serve as a key aid to professional reflective practice.
Research Aims: ·
To undertake a literature review on the
use of the professional portfolio to promote reflective practice in
education. ·
To develop a model detailing the key
elements of a professional portfolio used to underpin reflective practice.
·
To use this model as the basis for the
development of a relational database, the database to act as the central
element of a digital portfolio aid. ·
To assess the use of the digital portfolio
aid in a practical school setting. Methodology: ·
Develop a theoretical context via a review
of research literature on the topics of reflective practice, teacher
self-evaluation and the use of the reflective portfolio in education. ·
Arising from the study of relevant research,
construct an ICT artefact that will support the related activities of
portfolio preparation and reflective practice. ·
Identify potential participants in the
study, supply participants with the relevant hardware support where
necessary and instruct the participants in the use of the DPA. ·
Participants will use the artefact for
a period of approximately 12 week, with structured interviews and questionnaires
used as data gathering tools at the end of weeks 4 and 8 and 12. ·
The preparation of the formal research
report. How might this research
go forward? What organizations should be informed of your
work? We wish to be
convinced that this dissertation will not simply gather dust on a shelf. If your work is not presently funded identify
potential sources of funding. To expand the
work, or present work at a conference for example. Organisations that may express an interest in the
research include: ·
The Educational
Studies Association of Ireland ·
Educational
Departments at Universities offering the Higher Diploma in Education.
(The DPA may prove a useful tool for student teachers.) Time scale Project Stage
Completed work Dissertation Proposal Submission of final
dissertation proposal 20 October 2001 Participants Identification of
study participants 26 October 2001 ICT artefact Completion of work
on ICT artefact (DPA) and training participants in use of it. 9 November 2001 Stage 1 of DPA use. Participants will
use the DPA for an initial period of 4 weeks. Structure interviews
will be conducted at the end of Stage 1. Stage 1 will run
from 9 November to 7 December 2001. Stage 2 of DPA use. Participants will
use the DPA for an additional period of 4 weeks. Structure interviews
will be conducted at the end of Stage 2 and questionnaire will
be used to gather data. Stage 2: 10 December 2001
to 14 December 2001. 7 January 2002 to
24 January . Stage 3 of DPA use Participants will
use the DPA for an additional period of 4 weeks. Structure interviews
will be conducted at the end of Stage 3 and questionnaire will
be used to gather data. Stage 3: 28 January 2002 to
8 February 2002. 18 February to 1
March 2001. Literature Review Developing a theoretical
context: Literature review on reflective practice, self-evaluation
and portfolio development. 1 October 2001 to
January 30 2002 Research findings Final data gathering
and writing-up of research findings 1 March 2002 to 29
March 2002 Dissertation preparation First draft of dissertation. 1 May 2002 Final dissertation Submission of final
dissertation, support artefact and web site. 31 May 2002 Problem Areas 1 Selection of participants:
Can participants be non-random? Will this influence the manner of reporting
findings? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||