Perfection
Jnana Yoga
Verbal definition:
done
Functional definition: @100%, i.e. @1,
@best
Preparation: defragmentation
Analysis:
1 ... For 'verbal' read: relating to, or in the form of a word
2 ... For 'definition' read': from Latin definitivus,
meaning 'set within (local) limits'1
2.1 ... For 'set within limits' read: relativize, i.e. de-quantize,
make un'whole, de-absolutize, i.e. make incomplete by means of local
referencing, hence producing a localized display (i.e. a location)
serving as meaningful address
2.1.2 ... There is a problem here. The Latin word finitivus is
derived from finire, and which is derived from finis,
meaning: end. Hence de-finitivus means: un-ended. In practice,
defining means: elaborating (i.e. by associating attributes with) a
singularity 1,2
into a non-logic (albeit locally meaningful) multiplicity (or complex)3
2.1.2.1 ... For 'singularity' read: self-same, i.e. a system @ rest
1 (or @ maximum (internal) entropy,
elsewhere called nirvana ),
an initial (because inertial) state
2.1.2.1.1 ... For '@rest' read: in samadhi
2.1.2.2 ... For 'singularity' read: a non relativized, hence
fundamentally meaningless, because lacking position or location ( hence
graspable form) (logic) point
2.1.2.3 ... Which means that a (i.e. any 1 of n) definition
1 presents as fundamentally non-logic,
i.e. as 'pointless' (meaning: fundamentally meaningless)
2.1.2.3.1 ... A definition (i.e. the localization (via relativization)
of a (logic) point1
, elsewhere called secondary (to n) knowledge) happens as necessary (in providing location or address) but insufficient (as means to producing
absolute realness (hence primary knowledge)
2.1.2.3.1.1 ... A (logic1
) point, presenting as random (because not relativized) bit, happens
as sufficient (Kant; hinreichend) (means
to realness) but meaningless (i.e.
without (local) reference
2.1.2.3.1.1.1 ... For 'logic' read: from Greek; logos, meaning
'reason'. A logic point emerges when the process of (secondary to n)
reasoning (i.e. of the condensation or sublation of a multiplicity or
multiple relativity) comes to a halt, end or stop. Alone the (random)
point is ultimately 'logic' because it can collide 1 >< 1 (hence
c >< c) to produce a moment (or quantum) of (absolutely
sufficient) realness (Sanskrit: tattva ,
interpreted wrongly as sattva or
satya)
3 ... For 'perfect' read: from Latin per- 'through, completely'
+ facere 'do' 1
3.1 ... Therefore, for 'perfect' read: 'through or completely done
1'
3.1.1 ... For 'done' read: finished, ended, ceased, stopped,
terminated, shut down, extinguished and so on1
3.1.1.1 ... That which is finished, ended, ceased, stopped, shut
down, terminated, extinguished, completed, closed, and so on is
function (or process), i.e. serial action (or interaction), i.e.
stringing together (Sanskrit: chit )1
3.1.1.1.1 ... A function (or process) is ended (hence done, completed,
closed) by means of slicing or cutting 1
3.1.1.1.1.1 ... Slicing or cutting1
limits (absolutely) an ongoing (hence relativizing) function (or
process). In other words, slicing or cutting quantizes. Only quanta
2 (and all quanta present as random bits)
can be accessed (i.e. connected with @1, i.e. as a whole and become
real), since only a (random) quantum can instruct3
3.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... Slicing (or cutting), hence quantization, happens as
accessee (i.e. observer or in-putter) act (i.e. as sliced function). In
other words, a self sliced (or self-stopped,1
hence self-quantized) observer superimposes 2
his state (i.e. his stopped, hence inertial state) upon an ongoing
function (or process)
3.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... For 'self-stopped' read: (an) enstatic
1 (system, i.e. an ens)
3.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... For 'enstatic' read: @ maximum internal entropy,
therefore presenting for contact as an order of 1,
1 i.e. as an initial (because inertial)
state
3.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... For 'an order of 1' read: 1 or one (i.e. a
whole (because @ internal rest) quantum. The number 2 symbolizes the
relationship between two (random) quanta, i.e. 1's
3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2 ... Therefore the assertion (as suggestion) that ' All is 1' derives from
observer superimposition , that is to say, All
(i.e. an ongoing process or observed pattern) appears as 1 when an
observer superimposes his @rest (hence quantum or logic point) state
upon
the observed, thereby slicing and stopping it
1
3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1 ... From which follows that the assertion that ' God is 1' merely indicates the (@ rest,
hence full capacity condensed or concentrated) state of the observer
but says nothing whatever about God. From which follows that the above
statement should be altered to read: ' 1 is God',
i.e. a (any 1
of n) quantum (i.e. any whole unit) has the capacity to make make or
provide location (elsewhere interpreted as consciousness)
3.1.1.1.1.1.2 ... For 'quantum' read: Sanskrit: tattva , i.e.
a bit of 'that'
3.1.1.1.1.1.3 ... From which follows that only quanta (i.e. done, i.e.
stopped, i.e. sliced functions or processes) are perfect
1 (i.e. because they can make real, hence
true, certain and so on)
3.1.1.1.1.1.3.1 ... For which insight at least one ancient wise guy
invented the aphorism: '(Mind) stopped is God', i.e. only the stopped
(i.e. a (i.e. any 1 of n) quanta) can instruct and make real, or can
transmit (i.e. instruct serially) and generate a location or position
4 ... For 'functional' read: from Latin functio(n-),
from fungi 'perform'1
4.1 ... For 'perform' read: from Old French par 'through to
completion' + fournir 'furnish, provide'; in other words, carry
out, accomplish, or fulfill (an action, task or operation)
5 ... For '@100%' read: at full (i.e. maximum) capacity, i.e. leaving
no spare capacity,1
therefore totally, absolutely, i.e. pure
5.1 ... If and when 100% capacity is applied, no capacity remains for
alternate (i.e. relative) processing1,2
5.1.1 ... When relative (hence fragmented capacity) processing is
eliminated 1
(or excluded or restricted), absolute, therefore perfect contact happens
5.1.1.1 ... In other words, by creating a relativity vacuum a set (i.e.
a fixed, i.e. @ maximum entropy string or system) presents as a (logic)
point, i.e. as a done (thing), hence as perfect
1
5.1.1.1.1 ... Therefore, any function performed
@100% is (self-referentially) perfect
5.2 ...Capacity remainder (or surplus) prevents a system from acting
(i.e. contacting) as a whole (or 1), therefore preventing perfect (i.e.
in a vacuum, hence absolutely real) contact1
5.2.1 ... Therefore a capacity fragmented (i.e. not @ 100%) system acts
- and self-represents (i.e. experiences itself) - as imperfect
1,2 or impure
5.2.1.1 ... The function of yoga is to
eliminate (or restrict) capacity fragmentation (therefore fluctuation
between contacts) and return a system to @100% (therefore initial
state) application capacity. Practicing (and achieving) intent
singleness (or one-pointedness) serves as means of achieving 100%
application capacity, hence perfection
5.2.1.1.1 ... For 'imperfect' (or impure) read: Greek: hamartia
, meaning 'missing the mark or point', i.e. one-pointedness, elsewhere
interpreted (into a moral context) as 'sin'
6 ... For '@1' read: as a 1, i.e. as a complete, whole
1
6.1 ... Therefore as a quantum1
or unit, i.e. operating as a complete whole
6.1.1 ... For 'quantum' read: bit 1
6.1.1.1 ... For 'bit' read: a whole (i.e. self-complete,
1 i.e. @100%) unit or quantity capable of
producing an act2
6.1.1.1.1 ... For 'self-complete' read: @ maximum internal entropy,
i.e. all internal order(-ing) ceased, i.e. @ rest, i.e. in nirvana
6.1.1.1.2 ... For 'act' read: from Latin actus 'event, thing
done', 1
act- 'done' 2
from the verb agere
6.1.1.1.2.1... For 'event, thing done' read: Sanskrit: karma(n)
1, i.e. a quantum (or unit or bit) of
act(-ing), i.e. a moment (i.e. of arrested, cut or sliced momentum) of
touch, connection, contact (i.e. that makes real by means of 1 ><
1 or c >< c collision)
6.1.1.1.2.1.1 ... Reread 'karma(n)' to mean: a quantum (or bit) of tat
(meaning a discrete bit (hence once-off random connection
1) of 'that', i.e. as ubiquitous 'is')
6.1.1.1.2.1.1.1 ... For 'sequence of once-off random connections',
self-displayed by an observer as a specific contact momentum read:
Sanskrit: sat
, i.e. being
6.1.1.1.2.2 ... For 'done' read: completed, ended, finished, terminated
or ceased (function) 1,2
6.1.1.1.2.2.1 ... The basic (or primary) function that has ceased is
that of the 1 >< 1 collision, the connection or touch of 2 random
quanta (or bits). Such a collision produces a moment (or quantum) of
absolute (because in a relativity vacuum) realness (i.e. hardware
affect)
6.1.1.1.2.2.2 ... A (i.e. any 1 of n) complex (or secondary) function
that has ceased is that of the collision of 1 > < (1,1,1,1 to n),
i.e. of a sequence, therefore of an operation or function, and which
produces, if sliced or stopped by an observer, a real location (or
address,
or form), alternately interpreted as a location of realness
7 ...For 'defragmentation' read: elimination (or restriction, in fact
shut down1 ,
i.e. un-do) of (multiple, i.e. string) application
2 of initial state
3 capacity, i.e. of capacity spread
4
7.1 ... For 'shut-down' read: closure. Defragmentation closes (or ends
or stops (to a logic point)) an open (i.e. interactive,
ongoing, hence fragmented) system1
7.1.1 ... A closed system, presenting as a (random) point/singularity,
is perfect,1,2
i.e. because 'done'
7.1.1.1 ... Its perfection is self-referential, hence virtual. Whether
or not a system's state of perfection (i.e. as state of done'ness or
completion) becomes (i.e. qualifies as) real (i.e. via 1 >< 1
contact) depends on
the (perfection) state of the system with which it collides
7.1.2 ... A closed, therefore perfect system, presents for collision
(or action) as perfect, therefore superimposes its state (of
perfection) upon its (potential) contact
7.2 ... If and when initial state (hence @ 100% or @1) capacity is
applied, therefore spread and dissipated, its potential (for @1
contact) is diminished. 1
Defragmentation returns (or reverts) a system (i.e. a complex of
interactions) to initial state capacity, i.e. to (self-) absolute
capacity (i.e. of wholeness)
7.2.1 ... Dissipation of capacity reduces the capacity to make real.
1 In other words, since only an initial
(read: inertial, i.e. @ maximum entropy) state can make 1 >< 1
contact, thereby producing a realness quantum, systems have to shut
down (read: slice or cut) access of fragments (i.e. multiple
interaction) if they are to make contact (i.e. as means of becoming
real and as means of transmission)
7.2.1.1 ... For 'real' read: true, pure, certain and so on
7.3 ... For 'initial state' read: inertial, i.e. @ rest,
1 hence quantum (or bit) state
2
7.3.1 ... For '@rest' read: without (relative) action , therefore
without turbulence (i.e. heat) and so on
7.3.2 ... For 'quantum (or bit) state' read: having the contact
capacity of a point, i.e. of a singularity, hence of
(self-referential) absoluteness
7.4 ... Elimination of capacity spread (i.e. as dissipation, hence as
loss) returns (or increases) capacity towards (or to) its initial
state. The back-flow (i.e. as surge or rush) of capacity, resulting
from cutting off fragments, is interpreted as
enlightenment (i.e. as elimination (or relaxation) of weight or
drag-as-hindrance 1).
Locally the (relative) increase in (potential contact) capacity is
interpreted as freedom, which in turn is locally interpreted (by the
Guide & Control System) as joy or bliss (Sanskrit: ananda )
7.4.1 ... For 'elimination (hence relaxation) of drag' read; Yoga ,
meditation and so on. The elimination function is a self spiritualizing
act, i.e. it increase (or grows) self-capacity. However,
self-spiritualization by means of reversion to initial state capacity
of quantum (i.e. whole) function 1
(hence to self-perfection) merely prepares for the true (i.e. real
making) spiritual act of 1 >< 1 contact or the 1 ><
(1,1,1,1 ... to n) contact sequence that gives location to realness
7.4.1.1 ... This is false or fake spirituality.
1 It returns (i.e. releases, as in moksha ) a
system (i.e. a real location) to the initial, therefore virtual state
of inertia (Sanskrit: nirvana )
7.4.1.1.1 ... Using false or fake spirituality (to wit: yoga,
as
elimination or relaxation of relative drag) to achieve freedom (or
joy/bliss)
is akin to masturbation. In other words, it produces the fun without
the
transmission (hence creation) act. Fake spirituality returns a system
to
merely potential creativity. Both the attempt at self-transcendence and
the
attempt to reduce to perfect immanence (i.e. to absolute rest in/as the
self)
are attempts at faking spirituality. Only transmission (via contact) of
self
(in whatever state) operates as true spirituality, i.e. as the
initiation
of life (i.e. as locating realness)
8 ...
Elimination of fragmented capacity, i.e. shutting down capacity
dissipation, closes (and returns to inertness, i.e. to @maximum entropy
1) an open (i.e. active) system.
2 The closed (therefore inert) system
self represents as actually perfect3
(i.e. because all relativity has been eliminated from it). It presents
to alternate (inert) systems as virtually perfect, becoming real (hence
absolutely perfect) upon 1 >< 1 contact
8.1 ... @ maximum entropy a system 'waits' prior to realness (resulting
from 1 >< 1 contact) and location (resulting from serial contact,
i.e.
communication)
8.2 ... An open, because active, i.e. alive (hence in turbulence, hence
with drag, hence with reduced initial state contact capacity) system
operating @ less than maximum entropy generates real (i.e. hard-ware)
space/time (i.e. 'continuing' discretely discontinuous location). From
which follows that true
spirituality (i.e. the initiation of life, i.e. of located realness)
emerges
with loss of initial state capacity, i.e. with imperfection
8.3 ... In fact, a closed1
system does not self-represent at all since it 'waits' (unrelativized)
as a virtual unit. This understanding was not lost on the inventors of
the
Upanishads. Shankara suppressed the understanding since it did not
serve
his purpose, namely the reestablishment of the primacy of Veda (and of
the
Brahmins who enforced Veda and benefited from their enforcer function)
8.3.1 ... For 'closed' read: uniform1
(rather than self-unified), homogenous, meaning all difference
eliminated
8.3.1.1 ... The initial goal of yoga, i.e. of drag relaxation
(hence the increase of capacity; read: closure speed1
) is to revert to sameness (i.e. to uniformity as non-difference).
Thereafter the yoga adept, i.e. the yogi may use his initial state
capacity to achieve 1 >< 1 union and become real, or 1 ><
(1,1,1,1 .... to n) connectivity to generate a location (read:
consciousness), albeit at the price (read: sacrifice)
of total or partial loss of initial state capacity, i.e. as complete or
partial
exit from nirvana
8.3.1.1.1 ... For 'closure speed' (or rate) read: intelligence
(Sanskrit: bodhi or buddhi)