2.1 ... For 'condition' read: affect 1 potentialOneness
Jnana Yoga
Definition: state 1,2 of (a 3 ) 1 4
Function: impose 5 1'ness 6
Function result: realness 8
Analysis:
1 ... For 'state' read: from Latin stare 'to stand' 1,2
1.1 ... as in Latin: stasis, meaning to stand still, i.e. to be @ rest 1
1.1.1 ... For '@ rest' read: (self-) same 1, i.e. @ maximum entropy 2
1.1.1.1 ... For '(self-) same' read: (self-) consistent, homogenous, undifferentiated
1.1.1.2 ... For '@ maximum entropy' read: non active, i.e. non-communicative
1.2 ... For 'understand' read: processing a series of 'stands' 1
1.2.1 ... For 'series of 'stands'' read: Sanskrit: cit or chit ; or jnana
2 ... For 'state' read: fixed (i.e. @rest) condition 1
2.1.1 ... For 'affect' read: strike (i.e. instruct); 'touch', act1
2.1.1.1 ... For 'strike, touch or act' read: Sanskrit: karma(n)
3 ... For 'a' read: any 1 of n1
3.1 ... For 'n' read: an unlimited number13.1.1 ... For 'all' read: a limited1 number of 1's2
3.1.1.1 ... For 'limited' read: closed, ended, finished, done and so on, therefore perfect
3.1.1.2 ... 'All' happens as the (wholly steady, hence quantized) result of the superimposition of an observer's state of closure (or steadiness or fixation, read: psych'osis)
4 ... For '1' read: a virtual singularity, 1,2 i.e. a virtual unit, quantum or (unified 3 ) whole 4,5
4.1 ... Virtual1 singularity happens when difference, i.e. differential 2 processing 3 is eliminated 4
4.1.1 ... For 'virtual' read: not actual, therefore not real 1
4.1.1.1 ... Realness (Sanskrit: tattva) happens when 2 virtual entities (i.e. ens'es, two sameness slices) collide. Since both virtual entities (i.e. bits or quanta) present for collision @ random, hence without relativity, therefore in a relativity vacuum, each collides (or connects or touches) @c thereby producing (i.e. being affected as) a c 2 (read: c squared, i.e. c multiplied by c) moment or quantum
4.1.2 ... For 'differential' read: not same, indeed random
4.1.3 ... For 'processing' read: contacting, touching; affecting; instructing. Processing, as whole function, generates uncertainty, instability, i.e. because it ends @ rest status.
4.1.4 ... Yoga seeks to end (i.e. restrict to total elimination) uncertainty (and the suffering (i.e. heat) that results from uncertainty) by eliminating processing (of differentials). Yoga returns a system to (processing) sameness, thereby reverting to 'waiting' or 'readiness ', therefore initial state status
4.2 ... When virtual singularity (i.e. undifferentiated sameness 1) is cut, sliced or split (i.e. disturbed), 2 virtual1 singularities (or simplicities) happen 2
4.2.1 ... Whether or not sameness 'waits' as singularity or n-multiplicity is a mute question. Sameness can be cut 1 (i.e. 'cided' 2) once (to produce 2 virtual singularities) or it can be cut n times to produce n virtual singularities
4.2.1.1 ... For 'cut' read: here taken from Latin caedere 'cut'. It is from caedere that cision (as in incision (i.e. incut) and de'cision (i.e. de-cut, i.e. eliminate cut )) is derived
4.2.1.2 ... De'cision removes the cut, i.e. returns to sameness. Yoga , therefore, functions as decision making (hence turbulence elimination) process that produces a virtual (hence unreal, because random) logic point solution (i.e. a bit of karma). If the bit of karma is applied to (i.e. collided with) an alternate bit of karma, it (i.e. the Saguna Brahman as initial application) produces a quantum of absolute realness. If contact is avoided (i.e. eliminated), then no realness (i.e. tattva) or sequence of realness moments (sattva), i.e. being'ness, happen and the virtual karma bit 'waits' as Nirguna Brahman (i.e. as potential application, i.e. as Basic Operating System compressed to a moment free of location)
4.2.2 ... In short, 1 (i.e. one) means: first or initial cut or slice1
4.2.2.1 ... From which follows that a 1, i.e. a unit of oneness, therefore a virtual unit of difference (i.e. of split or cut (off) sameness) happens as secondary mode. The primary (non-) mode 'waits' as undifferentiated (i.e. uncut, unturbulated, i.e. @ max. entropy) sameness, 1 hence prior to both virtual and actual (singularity) affect (i.e. instruction)
4.2.2.1.1 ... Sameness cannot be described, hence cannot be referenced (or relativized) as 1 (i.e. One).1 Only the first cut (or disturbance) of sameness, and which produces to alternate same'nesses, namely that and that, can be described
4.2.2.1.1.1 ... From which follows that returning or reverting 1 or advancing to or stopping at sameness (and which is the ultimata goal of (classic) yoga) does not return to 1, i.e. does not produce the 1'ness affect. It produces the non-affect of nothingness (i.e. of no cut or split, hence 'waiting' without difference, i.e. relativity). The 1'ness affect happens as/at the last or first cut (of absolute sameness). The 1'ness affect is superimposed by an observer standing on at least one quantum of difference
4.2.2.1.1.1.1 ... Reversion to 1 is achieved by eliminating slices 1 (of sameness). 1 (i.e. Oneness) is eliminated when the final (i.e. 1st) slice is eliminated, thereby restoring original sameness (Sanskrit: sama or samya)
4.2.2.1.1.1.1.1 ... Eliminating sameness slices (i.e. differentials, hence relativities) is the essence of Jnana Yoga. The first goal of Jnana Yoga is to return (or revert) the Yogi to @1'ness, i.e. to an initial (hence @self-rest) state. The Yogi can then decide whether or not to apply the 1st sameness split, i.e. virtual unit status, 1 >< 1 to produce a moment of absolute realness (i.e. a real tat ); or 1 >< (1,1,1,1 ... to n) to generate a real string or pattern (i.e. a real chit, or jnana) and which he self-represents as location or address, locally experienced as consciousness. This is the basic mode of the bodhisattva. Or he can decide (sic, remove 'cision, i.e. the cut) to eliminate the final (or 1st) cut (i.e. the ultimate goal of Jnana 1 Yoga) to revert back to original (undifferentiated, hence nirguna) sameness, thereby sacrificing realness and consciousness (i.e. relative realness rebirth) and the (relative) sense of freedom (i.e. of whole potential which emerges with the 1st split)
4.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 ... In this case, Jnana: knowledge, is taken to mean: primary experience, i.e. the sense of absolute (i.e. non-relativized) realness
4.3 ... For 'unified' read: made into a unit (or quantum), i.e. made self-same, that is to say, all turbulence, i.e. active connectivity (therefore difference) eliminated
4.4 ... Unit (or quantum or (unified) whole, hence 1'ness) status is achieved when a system (i.e. a limited set (i.e. as locked series, hence as order or byte) of interactive quanta, therefore as arrested or frozen process) comes to absolute rest or stillness, i.e. when all internal (i.e. within the limit, therefore self-) turbulence ceases 2
4.4.1 ... A system (i.e. as series or pattern of random quanta) @rest, hence a (i.e. any) unit (i.e. quantum or unified whole), has perfected YOGA because its capacity application has become pointed 1,2 (i.e. singular), i.e. its capacity is not dissipated into a series (i.e. as a line (or sequence) or as a field (or pattern of lines or sequences))
4.4.1.1 ... A system becomes (one-) pointed (i.e. hence @ 1) when its capacity fragmentation (hence dissipation) has been fully ended, stopped. At pointedness, i.e. when a system returns to initial state capacity, a system achieves nirvana ,1 i.e. to extinction, i.e. to 'all capacity dissipation (i.e. into multiple connections) extinguished'
4.4.1.1.1 ... For ' nirvana ' (Sanskrit: nibbana) read: blown out, extinguished. Any set (or system) or sub-set (or sub-system, i.e. as local application) that has been blown out, i.e. whose internal activity (i.e. connectivity) has ceased (i.e. achieved maximum entropy) has reached nirvana 1
4.4.1.1.1 ... Parinirvana is attained when all systems, i.e. all applications as well as the basic operating system (or platform) have been shut down. At that instant a (life) system is virtually (i.e. in 'waiting') dead
4.4.1.2 ... At pointedness, a system (operating as a tat , i.e. as a virtual bit) interacts as a point and with a point, i.e. as 1 >< 1. In other words it interacts (or projects (or superimposes)) its state (of perfect concentration; read: sam'adhi ) on its connection (or contact)
4.4.2 ... Expressed in modern terms that means that when all internal turbulence (i.e. as active connectivity) ceases, stills (i.e. becomes fixed or frozen) absolutely, a system attains maximum entropy; in other words, that all (internal) ordering (hence order) has been eliminated 1 (i.e. compressed out)
4.4.2.1 ... Elimination (to extinction) happens either when a row or series is shortened (to 1), thereby speeding up closure (i.e. solution finding); or when a row is repeated, i.e. when order is produced and then compressed out via repetition so that a system (i.e. a process) quantized to stasis as a set) achieves quantum (hence mere point (or shell, i.e. a self-less affect) or angular momentum) status 1 ; or when a point (as whole quantum) collides 1 >< 1
4.4.2.1.1 ... For 'quantum status' read: perfect (i.e. done. i.e. reduced to a logic point) solution 1
4.4.2.1.1.1 ... For 'perfect solution', i.e. virtual quantum status read: Sanskrit: karma
4.5 ... For 'whole' read: @100% or @1, hence complete, ended, ceased, capacity dissipation extinguished, perfect, total, certain, absolute (self-)logic and so on
5 ... For 'impose' read: project onto, 1 superimpose
5.1 ... For 'project onto' read: affect as, instruct
6 ... For '1'ness' read: quantum 1 state
6.1 ... For 'quantum' read: (logic) point, 1 bit, i.e. singularity
6.1.1 ... For 'logic point' read: perfect (i.e. absolutely certain) solution 1
6.1.1.1 ... For 'solution' read: (absolute) residue. It's the residue (i.e. as non relative point) that transmits, not its producer, that is to say, not the (open, hence active) process (of elimination) that produces it. In short, residue (i.e. a perfectly (i.e. wholly stable or in stasis) logic solution)) is made real (i.e. via 1 >< 1 contact) and/or reborn (i.e. via >< (1,1,1,1... to n interaction), not its producer1
6.1.1.1.1 ... For 'producer' read: location (i.e. as locating action), i.e. form (Sanskrit: rupa). Form (i.e. series (Sanskrit: chit or jnana )) does not transmit because it is empty of realness making capacity
7 ... For 'realness' read: hardware affect 1,2,3
7.1 ... For 'hardware affect' read: Sanskrit: tat 1,2
7.1.1 ... The conventional translation (into English) of the Sanskrit term tat is 'that' or 'such', both of which are highly imprecise, therefore uncertain 1
7.1.1.1 ... Consequently, the most celebrated of ancient Indian statements: tattvam asi is highly uncertain because the term tat remains undefined. Moreover, the term 'tvam' can mean either 'you or thou' or serves to render (thereby reifying ) the term tat as an absolute (and the absolute too remains undefined), hence being read as 'ness'. Moreover, what the term: 'art' (i.e. you are) actually means (in discrete, i.e. nano terms) is not disclosed by the ancient Indians. Therefore tattvam asi can mean either: 'that thou art' or 'thatness art.'1
7.1.1.1.1 ... However, since all three terms of the statement remain fundamentally undefined, the statement remains fundamentally meaningless, though highly suggestive. In short, tattvam asi functions as a rhetorical device, i.e. as a means of persuasion, rather than as a statement of verifiable (or falsifiable) fact. That the great Shankara should have used tattvam asi as a proven (by scripture, and he claimed scripture as such was true) and wholly meaningful fact indicates the extent of his deception
7.1.2 ... Tat (i.e. a real moment or realness quantized to absoluteness) happens when 2 virtual tats collide 1 >< 1. At that instant, each virtual tat (presenting @ c, i.e. at the capacity of randomness, hence non-relativity) is multiplied @ 100% by itself. In other words, its entire (i.e. 100%) (contact in a vacuum) potential is activated self-referentially and, since no capacity remains with which to relativize (i.e. via alternate contact) the whole affect, that affect is self-referenced (i.e. self-displayed or self-experienced) as absolutely real, i.e. as perfectly (self-) consistent. Sat happens as analogue of a series (i.e. as chit or sutra, i.e. as thread or string) of tat's
7.2 ... The hardware affect happens only when two @oneness states (i.e. quanta, units or unified wholes, i.e. logic points) collide 1 to 1 1
7.2.1 ... Since a (i.e. any 1 of n) 1'ness (or quantum) state presents for contact at the capacity of c 1 and since contact happens in a (relativity) vacuum, the collision affect, self-displayed (or experienced) as absolute realness, is symbolized as c 2 , i.e. as c multiplied by itself
7.2.1.1 ... Collision happens @c because a quantum propagates (indeed waits (in readiness ), i.e. as in nirvana ) as a random (potential) event
7.2.1.1.1 ... For 'nirvana' read: blown out, extinguished, therefore ended, closed, finished, shut down. 'Nirvana' can also be mis'read as: bliss
7.3 ... Again, the realness affect 1 (i.e. tat) happens (only) when two whole (hence in stasis, i.e. frozen, i.e. self-arrested) systems, i.e. two perfect (i.e. all connectivity, hence turbulence eliminated) units, collide
7.3.1 ... The realness (or 'is') affect, resulting from random - and only random - collision, is momentary, hence quantized. 'Being' (Sanskrit: sat), i.e. apparent continuity of the 'realness or hardware' affect, happens as analogue (i.e. as sequence affect) of such momentary tat affects (or strikes)
7.3.2 ... Only units (i.e. wholes at rest, hence perfect singularities) collide directly, i.e. 1 >< 1, hence in a (relativity) vacuum, hence absolutely. 1 In that (relativity) vacuum, time, space and form, and which all happen as after-affects of sequential, therefore relative interaction, have been eliminated
7.3.2.1 ... The unitive vision or experience happens as projection (or superimposition) of an observer's state of self-union (i.e. of self-rest). When an observer achieves the @1 state, i.e. initial state capacity status, the next quantum contacted is experienced (i.e. fully realized or made real) as a 1. Therefore @1'ness indicates the (momentary, therefore cut or sliced, therefore frozen) state of the observer and not the state of the observed 1
7.3.2.1.1 ... From which follows that all experience (i.e. tactile application display) happens as self-experience, and all vision (i.e. visual application display) as self-vision